The role of compressibility in computing noise generated at a cavitating orifice

The computational fluid dynamics calculation can be accomplished by solving either compressible or incompressible Navier–Stokes equations to determine the flow-field variables of the noise source. The proper assumption depends on both the physical situation and the Mach number. Although in cavitating devices usually we are dealing with low Mach number flow, cavitation is an acoustic phenomenon that can be affected by compressibility. Cavitation behaves acoustically as a monopole and it is mentioned by some researchers that incompressible solution is sufficient to study the dipole sources. However, in order to study the monopole (and quadrupole) sources a compressible solution may be required. In this study, the role of compressibility in computing noise generated at a cavitating single-hole orifice was investigated using large eddy simulation and Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings formulation. The fluid zone downstream of the orifice where the cavitation occurs was evaluated as the acoustic source which generates sound. Time-accurate solutions of the flow-field variables on source surfaces were obtained from both compressible and incompressible flow simulations. Three cases of cavitation were studied and the sound pressure signals far downstream of the orifice were computed by the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings formulation. For a developed cavitation regime at low frequencies, there is a big discrepancy between the computed values of sound pressure level from compressible and incompressible simulations, and at higher frequencies greater than 6 kHz, both simulation methods provide almost the same values for sound pressure levels. For a super cavitation regime, both compressible and incompressible simulations provide similar values for sound pressure levels at frequencies greater than 2 kHz. The results of this work demonstrate that the compressibility has a significant role in terms of computing noise generated at a cavitating orifice and cannot be ignored, especially when the noise generated by developed cavitation regimes at low frequencies is investigated