全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2018 

Accuracy of ultrasound

DOI: 10.1177/1742271X18789711

Keywords: Ultrasound,accuracy,injection,carpometacarpal joint,ultrasound guided injections

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

To determine the accuracy of ultrasound guidance compared to palpation in performing carpometacarpal joint injections in cadavers. In all, 36 carpometacarpal joints were randomized to either ultrasound-guided or palpation-based injections, with 1?cc of blue latex solution injected into each joint. The specimens were then dissected and the distribution of the latex was assessed by two independent, blinded raters. Injection accuracy was evaluated on a four-point quartile rating scale of 1–4, corresponding to the amount of the latex solution within the joint (1?=?0–25%, 2?=?26–50%, 3?=?51–75%, 4?=?76–100%). Inter-rater reliability was a secondary measure. The mean rating of accuracy was 2.1 for both palpation-based and ultrasound-guided injections. There was no statistically significant difference in accuracy between the two injectors. Chi-square analysis testing differences in accuracy for the two conditions was not statistically significant. The Cronbach’s alpha for rater 2 was 0.74, which represents an acceptable level of reliability. A Friedman’s Chi-square for the two raters was 2.3 (p?=?0.13), indicating no significant difference between raters. Ultrasound guidance did not improve the accuracy of carpometacarpal joint injections in cadavers. However, the high inter-rater reliability attests to the value of the novel assessment scale

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133