全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

黄土高寒区浅山人工林植物群落生态位特征研究
Niche Characteristics of Plant Communities in Shallow Mountain Plantations in Loess Alpine Region

DOI: 10.12677/OJSWC.2020.84004, PP. 23-37

Keywords: 黄土高寒区,生态位宽度,生态位重叠,立地
Loess Alpine Region
, Niche Width, Niche Overlap, Site

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

生态位理论在研究植物群落物种组成、种间关系、结构功能、生物多样性等方面具有重要意义。本文以黄土高寒区大通县安门滩流域林草植被为研究对象,通过Shannon-Wiener指数和Pianka指数分别计算不同立地类型下典型人工林及林下草本的生态位宽度及生态位重叠。结果表明:乔木层在阴坡条件下,华北落叶松(Larixprincipis-rupprechtii May)生态位宽度最大(44.13、42.69、42.99);阳坡条件下,油松(Pinus tabuliformis Carr)和青杨(Populus cathayana Rehd)生态位宽度最大(39.56、40.22)。草本层中,白莲蒿(Artemisia sacrorum Ledeb)和早熟禾(Poa annua L)在不同立地下,生态位宽度均较高,说明二者适应能力较强,能够利用的资源位多。有建群效果树种的种对在不同立地下生态位重叠值范围在0.17~0.29间,说明混交林中,不同树种利用的资源位不同,种间竞争不强烈。草本层生态位重叠值,在阴坡受坡度影响较高,在阳坡受坡度影响较小。
Niche theory is of great significance in the study of plant community species composition, interspecific relationship, structure and function, biodiversity and so on. In this paper, the niche width and niche overlap of typical plantations and herbs under different site types are calculated by Shannon-Wiener index and Pianka index, respectively, taking the forest and grass vegetation in Datong County of Datong County as the research object. The results show that the niche width of Larixprincipis-rupprechtii May is the largest (44.13, 42.69, 42.99) under the condition of shady slope. Under the condition of sunny slope, the niche breadth of Pinus tabuliformis Carr and Populus cathayanais the largest (39.56, 40.22). In the herbaceous layer, the niche breadth of Artemisia sacrorum Ledeb and Poa annua L is large in different site conditions, which indicate that the two have universal adaptation and more resources could be utilized. All kinds of trees with the effect of building groups overlap in different underground niche. The range of value is 0.17 - 0.29, which indicates that the resource position of different tree species is different and the competition among species is not strong in the mixed forest. The niche overlap value of herbaceous layer is more affected by slope in shady slope and less affected by slope in sunny slope.

References

[1]  宋永昌. 植被生态学[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2001: 20-25.
[2]  Grinnell, J. (1917) The Niche-Relationships of the California Thrasher. Auk, 34, 427-433. https://doi.org/10.2307/4072271
[3]  张光明, 谢寿昌. 生态位概念演变与展望[J]. 生态学杂志, 1997, 16(6): 47-52.
[4]  Leibold, M.A. (1995) The Niche Concept Revisited: Mechanistic Models and Community Context. Ecology, 76, 1371-1382. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938141
[5]  杨晶晶. 青海省黄土丘陵沟壑区土壤侵蚀状况研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 陕西科技大学, 2014: 6-14.
[6]  董冬, 许小天, 周志翔, 等. 安徽九华山风景区古树群落主要种群生态位的动态变化[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(5): 1292-1304.
[7]  刘景, 潘存德, 余戈壁, 等. 火干扰烈度对喀纳斯针叶阔叶林主要植物种生态位的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(11): 1961-1971.
[8]  钱逸凡, 伊力塔, 胡军飞, 等. 普陀山主要植物种生态位特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(3): 561-568.
[9]  俞筱押, 余瑞, 黄娟, 等. 贵州茂兰喀斯特森林四药门花群落优势种群生态位特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(12): 3470-3478.
[10]  袁志忠, 何丙辉. 生态位理论及其在植物种群研究中的应用[J]. 福建林业科技, 2004, 31(2): 123-127.
[11]  王兵, 郑秋红, 郭浩. 基于Shannon-Wiener指数的中国森林物种多样性保育价值评估方法[J]. 林业科学研究, 2008, 21(2): 268-274.
[12]  李德志, 石强, 臧润国, 王绪平, 盛丽娟, 朱志玲, 王长爱. 物种或种群生态位宽度与生态位重叠的计测模型[J]. 林业科学, 2006, 42(7): 95-103.
[13]  郑淑霞, 王占林. 青海省浅山地区综合抗旱造林技术[J]. 山西林业科技, 2008(1): 53-55.
[14]  Samer, A.K. and Yara, B. (2019) The Importance of Accounting for the Uncertainty around the Preference-Based Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measures Value Sets: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Economics, 22, 671-683. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2019.1592178
[15]  Michael, A., Sofie, S., Barry, H.L., et al. (2019) Tree Diversity and Its Ecological Importance Value in Organic and Conventional Cocoa Agroforests in Ghana. PLoS ONE, 14, e0210557. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210557
[16]  高媛, 王继飞, 杨君珑, 等. 贺兰山东坡青海云杉林苔藓群落及环境之间的关系[J]. 水土保持究, 2019, 26(1): 221-226+233.
[17]  Finch, J., Walck, L.J., Hidayati, S.N., et al. (2019) Germination Niche Breadth Varies Inconsistently among Three Asclepias Congeners along a Latitudinal Gradient. Plant Biology, 21, 425-438. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12843
[18]  McFarlane, S.E., Murielle, ?., P?ivi, M.S., et al. (2018) Difference in Plasticity of Resting Metabolic Rate—The Proximate Explanation to Different Niche Breadth in Sympatric Ficedula Flycatchers. Ecology and Evolution, 8, 4575-4586. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3987
[19]  Rebecca, T.B., Kelly, A.C., Michelle, E., et al. (2018) Frederickson. Using Niche Breadth Theory to Explain Generalization in Mutualisms. Ecology, 99, 1039-1050. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2188
[20]  王国庆, 杜广明, 聂莹莹, 等. 草甸草原封育演替过程中主要植物种群生态位动态分析[J]. 中国草地学报, 2017, 39(6): 72-78.
[21]  刘发蓉. 青海云杉移栽及养护技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019(4): 140.
[22]  王辉, 贺康宁, 胡兴波, 等. 高寒区不同树种配置对林下植被物种多样性的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2012, 19(3): 147-150.
[23]  王伟伟, 杨海龙, 贺康宁, 等. 祁连山青海云杉人工林草本层生态位及生态响应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2012, 20(4): 626-630.
[24]  林勇, 艾训儒, 姚兰, 等. 木林子自然保护区不同群落类型主要优势种群的生态位研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(2): 223-234.
[25]  刘志鹏, 李峰, 王晓超. 衡水湖湿地植被的种群生态位研究[J]. 衡水学院学报, 2014, 16(4): 5-8.
[26]  刘屹, 邓竣尹, 谢天资, 等. 生态位研究进展及干旱河谷生态位研究重点[J]. 四川林业科技, 2015, 36(5): 16-20.
[27]  朱学灵, 叶永忠, 吴明作, 等. 宝天曼自然保护区园林观赏植物陕西紫茎及其伴生树种的生态位特征[J]. 河南科学, 2017, 35(10): 1603-1608.
[28]  许诺, 林开敏, 吴培培, 等. 杉木老龄林乔木层主要树种生态位研究[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2017, 37(3): 330-335.
[29]  赵天梁. 山西崦山自然保护区侧柏林植物生态位特征[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(8): 24-30.
[30]  王玉兵, 莫耐波, 汤庚国. 瑶山苣苔群落优势种群生态位研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2015, 54(4): 893-897.
[31]  冯飞, 张钦弟, 毕润成. 云丘山植物群落主要优势种生态位研究[J]. 山西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 27(4): 73-80.
[32]  郭燕. 杨邵. 沈雅飞, 等. 三峡库区消落带现存草本植物组成与生态位[J]. 应用生态报, 2018, 29(11): 3559-3568.
[33]  黄耀, 王乃江, 党鹏, 等. 黄土高原沟壑区油松人工林林下主要种群生态位研究[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 37(4): 46-51.
[34]  柴宗政, 王得祥, 张丽楠, 等. 秦岭山地天然油松群落主要植物种群生态位特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(8): 1917-1923.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413