全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

直流接地极土壤电阻率建模方法研究
Research on Soil Resistivity Modeling Method of DC Grounding Electrode

DOI: 10.12677/TDET.2020.93004, PP. 27-38

Keywords: 直流接地极,土壤电阻率,四极法,大地电磁法
DC Ground Electrode
, Soil Resistivity, Four-Pole Method, Magnetotelluric Method

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

直流接地极是直流输电工程的重要组成部分,其周围土壤电阻率的分布情况,直接影响到接地极的参数设计以及运行维护。为保证接地极的正常工作,避免对接地极附近人身安全及设备性能造成影响,有必要对接地极周边的土壤电阻率进行测试及建模。本文利用四极法和大地电磁法对接地极周边的土壤电阻率进行测试,将这两种测试方法得到的结果进行对比,综合分析了这两种方法在土壤电阻率测试方面各自的优缺点,并通过本团队自主研发的反演软件对土壤电阻率进行建模,最后根据该土壤模型计算得到的接地电阻值与参考值吻合度较高,验证了本文提出方法的可靠性和准确性。
The DC ground electrode is an important part of the DC transmission project. The distribution of the soil resistivity around it directly affects the parameter design and operation and maintenance of the ground electrode. In order to ensure the normal operation of the ground electrode and avoid af-fecting the personal safety and equipment performance near the ground electrode, it is necessary to test and model the soil resistivity around the ground electrode. In this paper, the four-pole method and the magnetotelluric method are used to test the soil resistivity around the ground electrode. The results obtained by these two test methods are compared, and the respective advantages and disadvantages of these two methods in soil resistivity testing are comprehensively analyzed. The soil resistivity is modeled by the inversion software independently developed by our team. Finally, the grounding resistance value calculated according to the soil model is in good agreement with the reference value, which verifies the reliability and accuracy of the method.

References

[1]  刘连光, 崔明德, 孙中明, 等. ±800 kV直流接地极对交流电网的影响范围[J]. 高电压技术, 2009, 35(6): 1243-1247.
[2]  胡毅. 直流接地极电流对输电线路接地构件的腐蚀影响研究[J]. 中国电力, 2000, 3(1): 59-61.
[3]  曾连生. 直流输电接地极电流对电力变压器的影响[J]. 高电压技术, 2005, 31(4): 57-58.
[4]  马成廉, 孙黎, 尚教会. 抗灾型电网安全风险评估方法研究[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2014, 30(9): 12-18.
[5]  赵婉君. 高压直流输电工程技术[M]. 第2版. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2011.
[6]  李景丽, 冯鹏, 栗超超. 深井型直流接地极散流机理研究[J]. 电瓷避雷器, 2020(4): 87-94.
[7]  陈坤汉, 杨道武, 朱志平, 杨海军. 接地网在土壤中的腐蚀特性研究[J]. 电瓷避雷器, 2008(4): 39-42 + 46.
[8]  Nayel, M., Lu, B., Tian, Y., et al. (2012) Study of Soil Resistivity Measurements in Vertical Two-Layer Soil Model.
[9]  颜喜平, 许根养, 敬亮兵, 张杰, 江龙才, 李志娟, 马福, 李景禄. 现场杆塔接地电阻和土壤电阻率测量存在问题及误差分析[J]. 电瓷避雷器, 2008(3): 38-41.
[10]  苏杰, 吴广宁, 曹晓斌, 等. 应用可控源音频大地电磁法的土壤电阻率测量[J]. 电网技术, 2011, 35(1): 141-145.
[11]  朱德朋. 磁法与大地电磁法数据二维联合反演研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2015.
[12]  马成廉, 刘利则, 徐冰, 等. 特高压直流输电接地极大地电阻率测量方法研究[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2015, 31(3): 6-10, 17.
[13]  解广润. 电力系统接地技术[M]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 1996.
[14]  杨生. 大地电磁测深法环境噪声抑制研究及其应用[D]: [博士学位论文]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2004.
[15]  杨磊, 张志勇, 李曼, 等. 直流电阻率法与大地电磁法的二维联合反演[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2016, 31(2): 851-855.
[16]  丁文伟. 直流电阻率法与音频大地电磁法二维联合反演研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 抚州: 东华理工大学, 2019.
[17]  袁志军, 王峥. ±500 kV龙泉换流站接地极运行分析[J]. 华北电力技术, 2006(10): 52-54.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413