全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Pregnancy Rate after Embryo Transfer on Day 5 and Day 6 in IVF. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

DOI: 10.4236/arsci.2021.91010, PP. 97-105

Keywords: Day 5, Day 6, IVF, Blastocyst, Clinical Pregnancy Rate

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Study Question: The question: is there any difference in pregnancy rate between embryo transfer day 5 and day 6 in IVF? What Is Known Already? Blastocyst transfer is increasingly popular in assisted reproductive technology (ART) centers today. Very few articles concentrate on comparing Day 5 and Day 6 embryo transfer with conflict results. Objective, Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of published controlled studies. Searches conducted from 2001-2020 on PubMed. Medline, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Science Electronic database is used to collect data, using the following search terms: blastocyst, Day 5, Day 6, embryo transfer (E.T.) and pregnancy rate. Materials, Setting, Methods: A total of 6 full-text articles preselected from 211 references, based on title and abstract. Two independent reviewers performed data selection and extraction according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement (PRISMA). This systematic review was conducted according to (PICO) standard. Random-effect meta-analysis performed on all data (overall analysis). Results and the Role of Chance: Data from 6 relevant articles were extracted and integrated into the meta-analysis that reported clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) as an outcome in 5640 cycles, 2274 cycle had embryo transfer at day 6 and the control was 3366 cycle had embryo transfer day 5 showed a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate following Day 5 embryo transfer compared with Day 6 embryo transfer with odd ratio and 95% confidence limit 0.73 (0.66 - 0.82) p value < 0.000. Sensitivity analysis led to similar results and conclusions. Limitations, Reasons for Caution: The validity of meta-analysis results depends mainly on the quality and the number of published studies available. Indeed, this meta-analysis included no randomized controlled trial (RCT). Wider Implications of the Findings: In regards to the results of this original meta-analysis, ART practitioners should preferably transfer D5 rather than D6 blastocysts. Further RCTs are needed to address the question of whether D6 embryos should be transported.

References

[1]  Bansal, K. (2011) Steps of IVF and ICSI. In: Bansal, K., Ed., Manual of Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) in Vitro Fertilization (IVF) and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI), Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 68-68.
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/11209_15
[2]  Yu, S., et al. (2018) New Application of Dydrogesterone as a Part of a Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol for IVF: A Randomized Controlled Trial Including 516 First IVF/ICSI Cycles. Human Reproduction, 33, 229-237.
[3]  D’Angelo, A., et al. (2019) Recommendations for Good Practice in Ultrasound: Oocyte Pick Up. Human Reproduction Open, 2019, hoz025.
https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz025
[4]  Wang, C. and Swerdloff, R.S. (2014) Limitations of Semen Analysis as a Test of Male Fertility and Anticipated Needs from Newer Tests. Fertility and Sterility, 102, 1502-1507.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.021
[5]  Mullen, M.A. (2019) In Vitro Fertilization and Male-Factor Infertility. In: Burfoot, A., Ed., Encyclopedia of Reproductive Technologies, Routledge, London, 247-250.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429037399-47
[6]  Palermo, G.D., et al. (2017) Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: State of the Art in Humans. Reproduction, 154, F93-F110.
https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-17-0374
[7]  Bortoletto, P., Bakkensen, J. and Anchan, R.M. (2018) Embryo Transfer: Timing and Techniques. Minerva Endocrinologica, 43, 57-68.
[8]  Shapiro, B.S., et al. (2001) A Comparison of Day 5 and Day 6 Blastocyst Transfers. Fertility and Sterility, 75, 1126-1130.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01771-X
[9]  Moher, D., et al. (2009) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. BMJ, 339, b2535.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
[10]  Siahaan, S. (2017) Pregnancy Rate on Blastocyst versus Cleavage Stage Embryo Transfer. The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Infertility, Vienna, Austria, 30 November-2 December, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.26226/morressier.59f838b6d462b8028d897311
[11]  Haas, J., Meriano, J., Laskin, C., Bentov, Y., Barzilay, E., Casper, R.F., et al. (2016) Clinical Pregnancy Rate Following Frozen Embryo Transfer Is Higher with Blastocysts Vitrified on Day 5 than on Day 6. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 33, 1553-1557.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0818-x
[12]  Poulsen, V., et al. (2017) Elective Embryo Transfers on Day 6 Reduce Implantation Compared with Transfers on Day 5. Human Reproduction, 32, 1238-1243.
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex059
[13]  Tannus, S., Cohen, Y. and Henderson, S. (2018) Fresh Transfer of Day 5 Slow-Growing Embryos versus Deferred Transfer of Vitrified, Fully Expanded Day 6 Blastocysts: Which Is the Optimal Approach? Human Reproduction, 34, 44-51.
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey351
[14]  Ferreux, L., Bourdon, M., Sallem, A., Santulli, P., Barraud-Lange, V., Foll, N.L., et al. (2018) Live Birth Rate Following Frozen-Thawed Blastocyst Transfer Is Higher with Blastocysts Expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6. Human Reproduction, 33, 390-398.
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey004
[15]  Sciorio, R., Thong, K. and Pickering, S.J. (2019) Increased Pregnancy Outcome after Day 5 versus Day 6 Transfers of Human Vitrified-Warmed Blastocysts. Zygote, 27, 279-284.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199419000273
[16]  Hatirnaz, S. and KanatPektas, M. (2017) Day 3 Embryo Transfer versus Day 5 Blastocyst Transfers: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14, 82-88.
https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.99076
[17]  Maxwell, S.M., et al. (2015) A Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes between Day 3 and Day 5/6 Embryo Transfers: Does Day of Embryo Transfer Really Make a Difference? Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 32, 249-254.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0404-z
[18]  Li, Y.X., Wang, J., Sun, T.Z., Lv, M.Q., Ge, P., Li, H.N., et al. (2020) Pregnancy Outcomes after Day 5 versus Day 6 Blastocyst-Stage Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 46, 595-605.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14188
[19]  Bourdon, M., Pocate-Cheriet, K., Bantel, A.F.D., Grzegorczyk-Martin, V., Hoffet, A.A., Arbo, E., et al. (2019) Day 5 versus Day 6 Blastocyst Transfers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes. Human Reproduction, 34, 1948-1964.
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez163
[20]  Glujovsky, D., Farquhar, C., Retamar, A.M.Q., Sedo, C.R.A. and Blake, D. (2016) Cleavage Stage versus Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfer in Assisted Reproductive Technology. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 7, CD002118.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub5

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413