全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Susceptibility-Weighted MRI in the Evaluation of Gynecologic Diseases

DOI: 10.4236/ojmi.2021.111002, PP. 6-17

Keywords: Endometriosis, Susceptibility Weighted Imaging (SWI), Adenomyosis, Signal Void, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Hemorrhagic Gynecological Disease

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Introduction: Owing to the advanced development of MRI science, it causes obvious great changes of many diseases that affect the female genital system and affect their fertility. Hemorrhagic gynecological diseases especially endometriosis affect young females and cause cyclic pain, in addition to infertility. So early detection is essential for proper treatment. Susceptibility-weighted (SWI) as one of the most recent newly created MRI sequences is highly sensitive to detect products of hemorrhage within different gynecologic disorders with 94.7% sensitivity being more meticulous than conventional MRI sequences as T1 and T2. Aim of the Work: A comparison between T1 and T2 as conventional MRI sequences with susceptibility-weighted images (SWI) in many gynecologic disorders by the detection of the presence of internal products of hemorrhage at any stage. Subjects and Methods: 48 consecutive patients from Benha University clinics (age range, 17 - 60 years; mean age, 35.67 years). The patients included in the study were presenting with pelvic pain, irregular menses, Dyspareunia, and swelling. All with suspicious diagnosis of ovarian and extra-ovarian lesions. 38 patients out of the 48 patients were known to contain hemorrhagic disorder; all the patients underwent MRI routine pelvis protocol adding SWI sequence. Results: There was a greatly significant difference between SWI and conventional MRI sequences T1and T2 with sensitivity 94.7%, 57.9% and 33.3% respectively. Conclusion: SWI is a promising tool in the evaluation of hemorrhagic foci within different gynecological disorders. The great ability of detecting hemosiderin foci increases the value of SWI over conventional MRI or US.

References

[1]  Takeuchi, M., Matsuzaki, K. and Nishitani, H. (2008) Susceptibility-Weighted MRI of Endometrioma: Preliminary Results. American Journal of Roentgenology, 191, 1366-1370.
https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3974
[2]  Deistung, A. (2008) Susceptibility Weighted Imaging at Ultra High Magnetic Field Strengths: Theoretical Considerations and Experimental Results. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 60, 1155-1168.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21754
[3]  Krishnan, A.S., Lansley, J.A., Jäger, H.R. and Mankad, K. (2015) New Vistas in Clinical Practice: Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 5, 448-452.
[4]  Takeuchi, M., Matsuzaki, K. and Harada, M. (2015) Susceptibility-Weighted MRI of Extra-Ovarian Endometriosis: Preliminary Results. Abdomn Imaging, 40, 2512-2416.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0378-z
[5]  Wu, Z., Mittal, S. and Kish, K. (2009) Identification of Calcification with MRI Using Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging: A Case Study. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 29, 177-182.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21617
[6]  Sehgal, V., Delproposto, Z., Haddar, D., et al. (2006) Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging to Visualize Blood Products and Improve Tumor Contrast in the Study of Brain Masses. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 24, 41-51.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20598
[7]  Sakshi, K.H., Prativa, S., Mukta, K., et al. (2016) Susceptibility Weighed with Quantitative Phase Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differentiation of Different Stages of Hemorrhage and Calcification in Female Pelvic Pathologies. A Preliminary Study. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 41, 586-591.
https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000551
[8]  Dogheim, O.Y., Abdel Hamid, A.M., Barakat, M.S., Eid, M. and El-Sayed, S.M. (2014) Role of Novel Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences in Characterization of Ovarian Masses. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 45, 237-251.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2013.11.008

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133