全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Comparison and Adaptation of Two Strategies for Anomaly Detection in Load Profiles Based on Methods from the Fields of Machine Learning and Statistics

DOI: 10.4236/ojee.2020.102003, PP. 37-49

Keywords: Energy Efficiency, Anomaly Detection, Load Profiles, LSTM, PEWMA

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The Federal Office for Economic Affairs and Export Control (BAFA) of Germany promotes digital concepts for increasing energy efficiency as part of the “Pilotprogramm Einsparzähler”. Within this program, Limón GmbH is developing software solutions in cooperation with the University of Kassel to identify efficiency potentials in load profiles by means of automated anomaly detection. Therefore, in this study two strategies for anomaly detection in load profiles are evaluated. To estimate the monthly load profile, strategy 1 uses the artificial neural network LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory), with a data period of one month (1 M) or three months (3 M), and strategy 2 uses the smoothing method PEWMA (Probalistic Exponential Weighted Moving Average). By comparing with original load profile data, residuals or summed residuals of the sequence lengths of two, four, six and eight hours are identified as an anomaly by exceeding a predefined threshold. The thresholds are defined by the Z-Score test, i.e., residuals greater than 2, 2.5 or 3 standard deviations are considered anomalous. Furthermore, the ESD (Extreme Studentized Deviate) test is used to set thresholds by means of three significance level values of 0.05, 0.10 and 0.15, with a maximum of k = 40 iterations. Five load profiles are examined, which were obtained by the cluster method k-Means as a representative sample from all available data sets of the Limón GmbH. The evaluation shows that for strategy 1 a maximum F1

References

[1]  European Commission (2014) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions a Policy Framework for Climate and Energy in the Period from 2020 to 2030. Document 52014DC0015.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52014DC0015&qid=1611915593867
[2]  European Commission (2019) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions the European Green Deal. Document 52014DC0015.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2019:640:FIN
[3]  Krewitt, W., Nienhaus, K., Kleßmann, C., Capone, C., Stricker, E., Graus, W., Hoogwijk, M., Supersberger, N., Winterfeld, U. and Samadi, S. (2009) Role and Potential of Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency for Global Energy Supply.
https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/role-potential-of-renewable-energy-energy
[4]  Federal Office of Economics and Export Control (2021) Federal Funding for Pilot Program on Energy-Saving Meters.
https://www.bafa.de/DE/Energie/Energieeffizienz/Einsparzaehler/einsparzaehler_node.html
[5]  Chandola, V., Banerjee, A. and Kumar, V. (2009) Anomaly Detection: A Survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41, 1-58.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1541880.1541882
[6]  Aggarwal, C.C. (2017) Outlier Analysis. 5th Edition, Springer International Publishing, Cham.
[7]  Blázquez-García, A., Conde, A., Mori, U. and Lozano J.A. (2020) A Review on outlier/Anomaly Detection in Time Series Data. arXiv preprint, arXiv: 2002.04236v1, 1-32.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.04236
[8]  Gupta, M., Gao, J., Aggarwal, C.C. and Han, J. (2014) Outlier Detection for Temporal Data: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 26, 2250-2267.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2013.184
[9]  Wang, X., Lin, J., Patel, N. and Braun, M. (2018) Exact Variable-Length Anomaly Detection Algorithm for Univariate and Multivariate Time Series. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 32, 1806-1844.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-018-0569-7
[10]  Makridakis, S., Spiliotis, E. and Assimakopoulos, V. (2018) Statistical and Machine Learning Forecasting Methods: Concerns and Ways Forward. PLoS ONE, 13, e0194889.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194889
[11]  Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J. (1997) Long Short-Term Memory. Neural computation, 9, 1735-1780.
https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
[12]  Siami-Namini, S., Tavakoli, N. and Namin, A.S. (2018) A Comparison of ARIMA and LSTM in Forecasting Time Series. 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, Orlando, 17-20 December 2018, 1394-1401.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2018.00227
[13]  Hundman, K., Constantinou, V., Laporte, C., Colwell, I. and Soderstrom, T. (2018) Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholding. Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, 19-23 August 2018, 387-395.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3219819.3219845
[14]  Carter, K.M. and Streilein, W.W. (2012) Probabilistic Reasoning for Streaming Anomaly Detection. 2012 IEEE Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP), Ann Arbor, 5-8 August 2012, 377-380.
https://doi.org/10.1109/SSP.2012.6319708
[15]  Patel, K., Hoeber, O. and Hamilton, H.J. (2015) Real-Time Sentiment-Based Anomaly Detection in Twitter Data Streams. In: Barbosa, D. and Milios E., Eds., Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, Cham, 196-203.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18356-5_17
[16]  Novacic, J. (2019) Implementation of Anomaly Detection on a Time-Series Temperature Data Set. Thesis, Malmö Universitet, Malmö.
[17]  Renshaw, J. (2016) Anomaly Detection Using AWS IoT and AWS Lambda.
https://aws.amazon.com/de/blogs/iot/anomaly-detection-using-aws-iot-and-aws-lambda
[18]  Rosner, B. (1983) Percentage Points for a Generalized ESD Many-Outlier Procedure. Technometrics, 25, 165-172.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1983.10487848

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413