全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Auto-Segmentation on Liver with U-Net and Pixel De-Convolutional Network

DOI: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2021.102008, PP. 81-93

Keywords: Liver Auto-Segmentation, Deep-Learning, U-Net, Pixel-Deconvolutional Network

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Purpose:?To improve the liver auto-segmentation performance of three-dimensional (3D) U-net by replacing the conventional up-sampling convolution layers with the Pixel De-convolutional Network (PDN) that considers spatial features. Methods: The U-net was originally developed to segment neuronal structure with outstanding performance but suffered serious artifacts from indirectly unrelated adjacent pixels in its up-sampling layers. The hypothesis of this study was that the segmentation quality of the liver could be improved with PDN in which the up-sampling layer was replaced by a pixel de-convolution layer (PDL). Seventy-eight plans of abdominal cancer patients were anonymized and exported. Sixty-two were chosen for training two networks: 1) 3D U-Net, and 2) 3D PDN, by minimizing the Dice loss function. The other sixteen plans were used to test the performance. The similarity Dice and Average Hausdorff Distance (AHD) were calculated and compared between these two networks. Results: The computation time for 62 training cases and 200 training epochs was about 30 minutes for both networks. The segmentation performance was evaluated using the remaining 16 cases. For the Dice score, the mean ± standard deviation were 0.857 ± 0.011 and 0.858 ± 0.015 for the PDN and U-Net, respectively. For the AHD, the mean ± standard deviation were 1.575 ± 0.373 and 1.675 ± 0.769, respectively, corresponding to an improvement of 6.0% and 51.5% of mean and standard deviation for the PDN. Conclusion: The PDN has outperformed the U-Net on liver auto-segmentation. The predicted contours of PDN are more conformal and smoother when compared with the U-Net.

References

[1]  Bray, F., et al. (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68, 394-424.
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30207593.
[2]  Renehan, A.G., Zwahlen, M. and Egger, M. (2015) Adiposity and Cancer Risk: New Mechanistic Insights from Epidemiology. Nature Reviews Cancer, 15, 484-498.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3967
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26205341.
[3]  Hermoye, L., et al. (2005) Liver Segmentation in Living Liver Transplant Donors: Comparison of Semiautomatic and Manual Methods. Radiology, 234, 171-178.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2341031801
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15564393.
[4]  Heimann, T., et al. (2009) Comparison and Evaluation of Methods for Liver Segmentation from CT Datasets. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 28, 1251-1265.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2009.2013851
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19211338.
[5]  Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. and Brox, T. (2015) U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. arXiv E-Prints: 1505.04597.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015arXiv150504597R
[6]  Pinaya, W.H. L., et al. (2020) Convolutional Neural Networks. In: Mechelli, A. and Vieira, S., Machine Learning, Academic Press, Cambridge MA, USA, 173-191.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815739-8.00010-9
[7]  Vedaldi, A. and Lenc, K. (2014) MatConvNet: Convolutional Neural Networks for MATLAB. arXiv E-Prints: 1412.4564.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2733373.2807412
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014arXiv1412.4564V
[8]  Odena, A., Dumoulin, V., and Olah, C. (2016) Deconvolution and Checkerboard Artifacts. Distill, 1.
https://doi.org/10.23915/distill.00003
http://distill.pub/2016/deconv-checkerboard
[9]  Gao, H., et al. (2017) Pixel Deconvolutional Networks. arXiv E-Prints:1705.06820.
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv170506820G
[10]  Ioffe, S. and Szegedy, C. (2015) Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift. arXiv E-Prints: 1502.03167.
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015arXiv150203167I
[11]  Glorot, X., Bordes, A., and Bengio, Y. (2011) Deep Sparse Rectifier Neural Networks. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 15, 315-323.
[12]  (2012) Varian Eclipse Treatment Planning System. Biomedical Safety & Standards, 42, 94 p.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BMSAS.0000415578.78534.e8
https://journals.lww.com/biomedicalsafetystandards/Fulltext/2012/07010/Varian_Eclipse_Treatment_Planning_System.10.aspx.
[13]  Yaniv, Z., et al. (2018) SimpleITK Image-Analysis Notebooks: A Collaborative Environment for Education and Reproducible Research. Journal of Digital Imaging, 31, 290-303.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-017-0037-8
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29181613.
[14]  Shackleford, J.A., et al. (2012) Plastimatch 1.6—Current Capabilities and Future Directions. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Image-Guidance and Multimodal Dose Planning in Radiation Therapy, Octorber 2012, Nice, France.
[15]  Abadi, M., et al. (2016) TensorFlow: A System for Large-Scale Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, Savannah, GA, USA, 2-4 November 2016, 265-283.
[16]  Kiefer, J. and Wolfowitz, J. (1952) Stochastic Estimation of the Maximum of a Regression Function. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23, 462-466.
https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729392
https://projecteuclid.org:443/euclid.aoms/1177729392.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133