全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

“三变”赋能绿色减贫的实践理性、价值逻辑及战略前瞻
The Practical Rationality, Value Logic and Strategic Prospects of the “Three Changes” Reform Empowering Green Poverty Reduction

DOI: 10.12677/JLCE.2021.102005, PP. 36-43

Keywords: 绿色减贫,实践理性;价值逻辑;“三变”改革
Green Poverty Reduction
, Practical Rationality, Value Logic, “Three Changes” Reform

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

“三变”改革是在政府主导、社会资本与贫困群体参与,经济规律遵循基础上,综合运用政府与市场、宏观与微观等手段、方法以及政策实现绿色减贫能力体系的逻辑生成。从实践理性看,“三变”拓宽农业提质增效路径、农村发展市场半径,农民增收致富途径;“坚持以人民为中心”的价值取向,共同富裕的奋斗目标,中国梦的人文关怀实现“绿水青山就是金山银山”。从价值逻辑看,坚持党的领导,贫困主体参与,强化制度与哲学思辨,催生内源性向外源性、政策性向制度性、逻辑性向规律性减贫转变。绿色减贫既为中国当下绝对贫困消除,未来相对贫困消解提供实践借鉴,又为世界乃至人类减贫事业发展提供方法论思考。
The “Three Changes” reform is based on the government's leadership, social capital and the partic-ipation of poor groups, and compliance with economic laws, comprehensively using government and market, macro and micro methods, methods, and policies to achieve the logical generation of a green poverty reduction capability system. From a practical rational point of view, the “three changes” reform has broadened the path to improve agricultural quality and efficiency, the market radius of rural development, and the way for farmers to increase their income. Humanistic care has realized that “green water and green mountains are golden and silver mountains”. From the value logic point of view, adhere to the leadership of the party, the participation of poor subjects, strengthen the system and philosophical speculation, and promote the transformation of endoge-nous and exogenous, policy to institutional, and logical to regular poverty reduction. Green poverty reduction not only provides practical reference for the elimination of absolute poverty in China now and the elimination of relative poverty in the future, but also provides methodological thinking for the development of poverty reduction in the world and even mankind.

References

[1]  张琦, 胡田田. 中国绿色减贫指数绿色减贫理论综述[J]. 经济研究参考, 2015(10): 25-32.
[2]  World Bank (2010) World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty. World Bank, Washington DC, 88-90.
[3]  Oppenheim, C. (1993) Poverty: The Facts. Child Poverty Action Group, London, 33-41.
[4]  高景柱. 超越平等的资源主义与福利主义分析路径——基于阿玛蒂亚森的可行能力平等的分析[J]. 人文杂志, 2013(1): 29-36.
[5]  Foster, J., Greer, J. and Thorbecke, E. (1984) A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures. Econometrica, 52, 761-766.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1913475
[6]  Sen, A. (1981) Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Depriva-tion. Oxford University Press, New York.
[7]  Creedy, J. and Kalb, G. (1998) The Dynamics of Inequality and Poverty. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
[8]  王晓云, 张小鹿, 吴婷. 贫困治理视角下的中国绿色减贫问题[J]. 未来与发展, 2019, 43(5): 30-34.
[9]  万君, 张琦. 绿色减贫: 贫困治理的路径与模式[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 34(5): 79-86.
[10]  祁新华, 林荣平, 程煜, 等. 贫困与生态环境相互关系研究述评[J]. 地理科学, 2013(12): 1498-1505.
[11]  王晓毅. 绿色减贫: 理论、政策与实践[J]. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 46(4): 28-35
[12]  秦国伟, 董玮. 绿色减贫的理论内涵与路径创新[J]. 东岳论坛, 2019(2): 94-101.
[13]  王曙光. 中国扶贫——制度创新与理论演变(1949-2020) [M]. 上海: 商务印书馆, 2020.
[14]  雷明. 2020后扶贫战略思考: 构建反贫困命运共同体[N]. 社会科学报, 2019-03-16 (第1647期第1版).

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413