全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

多种纤维协议和纺织品贸易
Multi-Fibre Arrangement and Textile Trade

DOI: 10.12677/BGlo.2021.93008, PP. 53-63

Keywords: 多种纤维协议,自愿性出口限制,防卫措施,纺织品和成衣协议
Multi-Fibre Arrangement
, Voluntary Export Restraints, Safeguard Measures, The Agreement on Textiles and Clothing

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

1974年在GATT主持下,签订多种纤维协议(MFA),订立初衷拟建构一项临时性措施,后历经四次展期,计有54个纺织品进出口国家和地区参与,对国际纺织品贸易产生重大影响。乌拉圭回合达成协议要求成员国将其数量限制和VERs转换为课征标准关税,尽管各国废止MFA进展过程缓慢,最后同意在10年内废止MFA。自1995年创建世界贸易组织(WTO)起,纺织品和成衣协议(ATC)取代了MFA。乌拉圭回合的「防卫措施」旨在禁止大多数VERs安排。本文详述欧美国家在那十年间必须分阶段逐步取消MFA配额,以及发展中国家与发达国家政策分歧。MFA从出现在世界贸易舞台到落幕,尽管它曾经掀起各国贸易政治纷争,但在MFA展期中,确实带给纺织品出口国生产面质量升级效果;在MFA废止之后,也带给纺织品进口国消费面质量降级效果,这是本文的重要研究发现,也都是我们要铭记这段经济史的智慧遗产。
Under the auspices of GATT, the Multi-Fibre Arrangement (MFA) was signatory in 1974. The original intention was to establish a temporary measure. After four exhibitions, 54 textile import and export countries participated, which had a significant impact on international textile trade. A major agreement reached in the Uruguay Round is to require member states to convert their quantitative restrictions and VERs into standard tariffs. Although the progress of the abolition of MFA has been slow, they finally agreed to abolish MFA within 10 years. Since the World Trade Organization was established in 1995, the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (ATC) has replaced MFA. The “safe-guard measures” of the Uruguay Round aimed to prohibit most VERs arrangements. This article details the need for European and American countries to phase out MFA quotas during that decade, as well as policy divergences between developing countries and developed countries. From its appearance on the world trade stage to its ending, MFA has caused political disputes in the trade of various countries, but during the MFA exhibition, it has indeed brought the quality upgrading effect in production of textile exporting countries. After the abolition of MFA, it also brought the quality downgrading effect in consumption of textile importing countries. This is an important research finding of this article, and it is also the intellectual heritage of this economic history that we must remember.

References

[1]  林炳文, 林佳蓉. 国际贸易原理与政策[M]. 第3版. 台北: 指南书局, 2020: 302-306.
[2]  Urata, S. (2019) Japan-US Trade Frictions: The Past, the Present, and Implications for China-US Trade War. Asian Economic Policy Review, 15, 141-159.
https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12279
[3]  Jackson, J.H. (1997) The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations. 2nd Edition, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 53.
[4]  Hindley, B. (1987) GATT Safeguards and Voluntary Export Restraints: What Are the Interests of Developing Countries? The World Bank Economic Review, 1, 689-705.
https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/1.4.689
[5]  Brenton, P., Scott, H. and Sinclair, P. (1997) International Trade: A European Text. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 348.
[6]  Krugman, P.R., Obstfeld, M. and Melitz, M. (2017) International Economics: Theory and Policy. 10th Edition, Pearson Education Inc., Boston, 263.
[7]  Hoekman, B.M. and Kostecki, M.M. (2001) The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond. Oxford University Press, New York, 229-230.
https://doi.org/10.1093/019829431X.001.0001
[8]  李善同, 何建武. 后配额时期中国、美国及欧盟纺织品贸易政策的影响分析[J]. 世界经济, 2007, 30(1): 3-11.
[9]  香港贸易发展局. 后配额时期纺服对美欧市场出口趋势统计[EB/OL].
http://www.texnet.com.cn, 2008-09-14.
[10]  汪威錞, 后配额时代的中美纺织品贸易与障碍[EB/OL]. 中华经济研究院WTO电子报, 第143-4期.
https://web.wtocenter.org.tw/file/newsletter/OrderNewsletter/wtoepaper/article143.htm, 2008-12-19.
[11]  纺拓会市场开发处. 2015年台湾纺织业情况暨纺织品国际经贸情势分析[EB/OL].
http://monitor.textiles.org.tw/doc/, 2016-03.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133