全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Inclusive Urban Campus Development: A Case for Okahandja, Namibia

DOI: 10.4236/jbcpr.2021.94015, PP. 231-250

Keywords: Inclusive Urban Campus Development, Stakeholder Engagement, Housing, Sustainable Infrastructure

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

As a result of the high rate of urbanization and the attendant growth in housing demand and proliferation of informal settlements in sub-Saharan African countries such as Namibia, the development of cities has become a priority concern of the governments given the obvious socio-economic and environmental challenges that impact sustainable infrastructure/services, quality of life, health and well-being of the citizenry as referenced in the United Nation Sustainable Development Goal (UN SDG) Number 11. Whereas the governments are conscious of these daunting challenges, they remain unable to decipher sustainable solutions to them. The consequence is the perennial proliferation of informal settlements, housing shortages, and urban poverty, pressure on infrastructure and services, and unemployment. Although dubbed a “Garden Town” Okahandja does not have an urban structure plan of development. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of socially inclusive urban infrastructure campus development using Okahandja as a platform. Recent research has revealed such trends as the smart city concept which embodies a sustainable approach to Inclusive Urban Campus (IUC) development towards a holistic community planning in third world countries. Dololo site in the south of Okahandja stands out as an opportune urban campus platform for diverse mixed-use including residential, business-related (entrepreneurial), educational, recreational, and others. The research employed a novel multi-focused workshop methodology for data collection with community engagement and stakeholders’ interactive participation as a key strategy to enhance the bottom-up development approach. The objectives were to identify the town planning and integrated development dynamics of Okahandja, the policy bottlenecks, expose sustainable forms of socio-cultural integration and formal housing delivery. Ultimately, the feasibility of Dololo as a platform for the inclusive urban campus initiative was not in doubt. Infrastructural development and community need to accommodate education, Small and Medium Enterprise (SME), Vocational Training Center (VTC), informal trade, housing, health, youth centers, cooperatives, roads, and transport are identified as key to the IUC development.

References

[1]  World Population Review (2021) Population of Cities in Namibia.
https://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/cities/namibia
[2]  Magdaniel, F. (2013) The University Campus and Its Urban Development in the Context of the Knowledge Economy. EURA Conference Cities as Seedbeds for Innovation, Enschede, 3-6 July 2013, 17 p.
[3]  Charles, D. (2011) The Role of Universities in Building Knowledge Cities in Australia. Built Environment, 37, 281-298. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.37.3.281
[4]  Den Heijer, A., De Vries, J. and De Jonge, H. (2012) Developing Knowledge Cities: Towards Aligning Urban and Campus Strategies. In: Van Geenhuizen, M. and Nijkamp, P., Eds., Creative Knowledge Cities: Myths, Visions and Realities, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 104-131.
https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857932853.00011
[5]  Nallathiga, R. (2013) Inclusive Urban Planning and Development through the Earmarking of Land and Housing for the Urban Poor. Proceedings (Technical Papers: Part II) of the 61st National Town and Country Planners Congress, Ahmedabad, 8-10 February 2013, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2255843
[6]  Tvedten, I. and Mupotola, M. (1995) Urbanisation and Urban Policies in Namibia. SSD Discussion Paper 10, Multi-Disciplinary Research Centre, University of Namibia, Windhoek.
[7]  Friedman, F. (2000) Deconstructing Windhoek: The Urban Morphology of A Post-Apartheid City. University College London, Development Planning Unit, London.
[8]  Indongo, N. (2015) The Effect of Urbanisation on Housing Conditions in Namibia. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 2, 1-8.
[9]  GRN (1999) The Constitution of the Republic of Namibia. Government of the Republic of Namibia, Windhoek.
[10]  NSA (2019) Namibia Labour Force Survey 2018 Report. Namibia Statistics Agency, Windhoek.
[11]  Ministry of Regional and Local Government, Housing and Rural Development (2009) Namibia National Housing Policy. MRLGHRD, Windhoek.
[12]  Remmert, D. and Ndhlovu, P. (2018) Housing in Namibia: Rights, Challenges And Opportunities. Research Report: Right to Housing Project. Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), Windhoek.
[13]  Pouw, N. and Gupta, J. (2016) Inclusive Development: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 24, 104-108.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.013
[14]  Gupta, J., Pouw, N. and Ros-Tonen, M. (2015) Towards an Elaborated Theory of Inclusive Development. European Journal of Development Research, 27, 541-559.
https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2015.30
[15]  World Bank (2017) Does Fiscal Policy Benefit the Poor and Reduce Inequality in Namibia? World Bank, Washington DC.
[16]  Den Heijer, A. (2012) Managing the University Campus: Exploring Models for the Future and Supporting Today’s Decisions. Centre for Effective Learning Environments, No. 2012/02, 6 p. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9b950gh2xx-en
[17]  Poph, C. (2008) From Science to Policy through Transdisciplinary Research. Environmental Science & Policy, 11, 46-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.06.001
[18]  Polk, M. (2015) Transdisciplinary Co-Production: Designing and Testing a Transdisciplinary Research Framework for Societal Problem Solving. Futures, 65, 110-122.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.001
[19]  Cash, D.W., Clark, W.C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N.M., Eckley, N. Guston, D.H., Jäger, J. and Mitchell, R.B. (2003) Knowledge Systems for Sustainable Development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 8086-8091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100
[20]  Richardson, T. and Connelly, S. (2005) Reinventing Public Participation: Planning In the Age of Consensus. In: Jones, P., Petrescu, D. and Till, J., Eds., Architecture and Participation, Routledge, Abingdon, 28 p.
[21]  Rezazadeh, M.H., Zehi, F.H. and Rad, R.E. (2016) The Study of Moderating Role of Social Capital in the Relationship between Development of Urban Tourism and Sustainable Urban Development (Case Study: Zahedan). Current Urban Studies, 4, 461-475. https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2016.44030
[22]  Dodig, M.B. and Groat, L.N. (2020) The Routledge Companion to Games in Architecture and Urban Planning: Tools for Design, Teaching, and Research. 1st Edition, Routledge, New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429441325
[23]  Warburton, D. (1998) Community and Sustainable Development: Participation in the Future. 1st Edition, Routledge, Abingdon.
[24]  Jones, P., Petrescu, D. and Till, J. (2005) Architecture and Participation. 1st Edition, Routledge, Abingdon.
[25]  Diallo, A., Yin, Z.H. and Beckline, M. (2017) Assessing the Socio-Economic Impacts of the Informal Sector in Guinea, West Africa. Open Access Library Journal, 4, e3290.
[26]  Groat, L.N. and Wang, D. (2013) Architectural Research Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413