全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Toward a Holistic Approach: Considerations for Improved Collaboration in Wildfire Management

DOI: 10.4236/ojf.2022.121006, PP. 107-121

Keywords: Collaborative Land Management, Wildfire Policy, Stakeholder Engagement, Place-Based Knowledge, Indigenous Knowledge

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

State and Federal agencies in the United States manage wildland fires to minimize forest loss and reduce fire impacts on communities living near forests. Despite changes to policy that emphasize the importance of collaborative management with Tribes and local communities, stakeholders with place-based knowledge still have limited access to meaningful participation in policy development and management planning. These barriers contribute to the alienation of communities disproportionately burdened with the negative impacts of wildfire. Reduced community-level support and a lack of inclusive practices regarding place-based knowledge result in less robust management plans and poor ecological outcomes. These outcomes highlight the need for improved multi-stakeholder collaborations that holistically address interconnected management areas. In this paper, Federal wildfire policy development and implementation are assessed to identify barriers to collaborative management. An examination of multi-stakeholder fire management organizations showed that coupling of federal policy, practices and norms and the underrepresentation of external stakeholders may hinder progress toward collaborative partnerships. A linguistic examination of federal wildfire policy showed that directive, rather than cooperative language predominated. This may promote unequal power-sharing dynamics that reduce opportunities for federal engagement and collaboration with stakeholders from Tribes and local communities. Tribal barriers to equitable partnership and decision-making were found to be tied to culturally mediated frameworks for environmental management. Based on these findings, this article offers suggestions for changes to policy and institutional culture that will allow for an inclusive, holistic fire management model.

References

[1]  Ananda, J., & Herath, G. (2003). The use of Analytic Hierarchy Process to Incorporate Stakeholder Preferences into Regional Forest Planning. Forest Policy and Economics, 5, 13-26.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00043-6
[2]  Bayham, J., & Yoder, J. K., (2020). Resource Allocation under Fire. Land Economics, 96, 92-110.
https://doi.org/10.3368/le.96.1.92
[3]  Berkes, F. (2009). Indigenous Ways of Knowing and the Study of Environmental Change. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 39, 151-156.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03014220909510568
[4]  Berkes, F., & Berkes, M. K. (2009). Ecological Complexity, Fuzzy Logic, and Holism in Indigenous Knowledge. Futures, 41, 6-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2008.07.003
[5]  Busenberg, G. (2004). Wildfire Management in the United States: The Evolution of a Policy Failure. Review of Policy Research, 21, 145-156.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00066.x
[6]  Cochran, P. A., Marshall, C. A., Garcia-Downing, C., Kendall, E., Cook, D., McCubbin, L., & Gover, R. M. S. (2008). Indigenous Ways of Knowing: Implications for Participatory Research and Community. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 22-27.
https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.093641
[7]  Corburn, J. (2003). Bringing Local Knowledge into Environmental Decision Making: Improving Urban Planning for Communities at Risk. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22, 420-433.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X03022004008
[8]  DeLuca, T. H., MacKenzie, M. D., Gundale, M. J., & Holben, W. E. (2006). Wild-fire-Produced Charcoal Directly Influences Nitrogen Cycling in Ponderosa Pine Forests. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70, 448-453.
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0096
[9]  Franklin, J. F., & Johnson, K. N. (2014). Lessons in Policy Implementation from Experiences with the Northwest Forest Plan, USA. Biodiversity and Conservation, 23, 3607-3613.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0789-0
[10]  Goldstein, B. E., & Butler, W. H. (2010). Expanding the Scope and Impact of Collaborative Planning: Combining Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration and Communities of Practice in a Learning Network. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 238-249.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003646463
[11]  Gray, S., Chan, A., Clark, D., & Jordan, R. (2012). Modeling the Integration of Stake-holder knowledge in Social-Ecological Decision-Making: Benefits and Limitations to Knowledge Diversity. Ecological Modelling, 229, 88-96.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.09.011
[12]  Hagmann, R. K., Hessburg, P. F., Prichard, S. J., Povak, N. A., Brown, P. M., Fulé, P. Z. et al. (2021). Evidence for Widespread Changes in the Structure, Composition, and Fire Regimes of Western North American forests. Ecological Applications, 31, e02431.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2431
[13]  Hessburg, P. F., Prichard, S. J., Hagmann, R. K., Povak, N. A., & Lake, F. K. (2021). Wildfire and Climate Change Adaptation of Western North American Forests: A Case for Intentional Management. Ecological applications, 31, e02432.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2432
[14]  Holling, C. S. & Meffe, G. K. (1996). Command and Control and the Pathology of Natural Resource Management. Conservation Biology, 10, 328-337.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020328.x
[15]  Kimmerer, R. W. (2002). Weaving Traditional Ecological Knowledge into Biological Education: A Call to Action. BioScience, 52, 432-438.
https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0432:WTEKIB]2.0.CO;2
[16]  Knauf, A. (2015, October 27). When Firefighting Resources Are Thin, Reservations Are Left to Burn. The Seattle Globalist.
https://www.seattleglobalist.com/2015/10/27/firefighting-resources-washington-wildfires-yakama-colville-reservations-burn/43241
[17]  Lake, F. K., Wright, V., Morgan, P., McFadzen, M., McWethy, D., & Stevens-Rumann, C. (2017). Returning Fire to the Land: Celebrating Traditional Knowledge and Fire. Journal of Forestry, 115, 343-353.
https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.2016-043R2
[18]  Long, J. W., & Lake, F. K. (2018). Escaping Social-Ecological Traps through Tribal Stewardship on National Forest Lands in the Pacific Northwest, United States of America. Ecology and Society, 23, Article No. 10.
https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10041-230210
[19]  Marchand, M. E., Vogt, K. A., Cawston, R., Tovey, J. D., McCoy, J., Maryboy, N. et al. (2020). The Medicine Wheel: Environmental Decision-Making Process of Indigenous Peoples. Michigan State University Press.
https://doi.org/10.14321/j.ctvs89d9n
[20]  Mason, L., White, G., Morishima, G., Alvarado, E., Andrew, L., Clark, F. et al. (2012). Listening and Learning from Traditional Knowledge and Western Science: A Dialogue on Contemporary Challenges of Forest Health and Wildfire. Journal of Forestry, 110, 187-193.
https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.11-006
[21]  Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
[22]  NWCG.gov (National Wildfire Coordinating Group).
https://www.nwcg.gov/
[23]  Pyne, S. (1982). Fire in America: “A cultural History of Wildland and Rural Fire”. Princeton University Press.
[24]  Schultz, C. A., Thompson, M. P., & McCaffrey, S. M. (2019). Forest Service Fire Management and the Elusiveness of Change. Fire Ecology, 15, Article No. 13.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-019-0028-x
[25]  Steelman, T., & Nowell, B. (2019). Evidence of Effectiveness in the Cohesive Strategy: Measuring and Improving Wildfire Response. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28, 267-274.
https://doi.org/10.1071/WF18136
[26]  Tardivo, M. L., Caymes-Scutari, P., Bianchini, G., Méndez-Garabetti, M., Cencerrado, A., & Cortés, A. (2017). A Comparative Study of Evolutionary Statistical Methods for Uncertainty Reduction in Forest Fire Propagation Prediction. Procedia Computer Science, 108, 2018-2027.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.252
[27]  USDA (US Department of Agriculture) (2001). Fire Management Today: Fire Policy Update (Vol. 61). US Department of Agriculture.
[28]  USDA (US Department of Agriculture)/DOI (US Department of the Interior) (2009). Guidance for Implementation of Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy. US Department of Agriculture and US Department of the Interior.
[29]  USDA (US Department of Agriculture)/DOI (US Department of the Interior) (2014). National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy.
https://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/strategy/thestrategy.shtml
[30]  USDA/DOI Forests and Rangelands. Wildland Fire Leadership Council.
https://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/leadership/index.shtml
[31]  USDOI (US Department of the Interior) (1995). Federal Wildland Fire Management: Policy and Program Review. US Department of the Interior, US Department of Agriculture.
[32]  USFS (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service) (2011). National Forest System Land Management. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
[33]  Zackrisson, O., Nilsson, M. C., & Wardle, D. A. (1996). Key Ecological Function of Charcoal from Wildfire in the Boreal Forest. Oikos, 77, 10-19.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3545580

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413