|
大面积脑梗死单纯减容治疗6例报告
|
Abstract:
目的:探讨更有效治疗大面积脑梗死恶性脑水肿的外科方法。方法:选择超时间窗或取栓失败、保守治疗过程中预期发生恶性脑水肿的病例,使用充分内减压而保全颅骨的方法。结果:6例患者全部存活出院。没有一例发生硬膜下积液等常见的术后并发症。在9个月的随访期内,6例患者5例存活。1例患者能自行走动。结论:大面积脑梗死恶性脑水肿的患者,用单纯内减压方法处理,存活率高,并发症少,值得推荐。
Objective: To explore a more effective surgical method for the treatment of malignant cerebral edema in massive cerebral infarction. Methods: The patients with malignant cerebral edema due to exceeding the time or failure of thrombectomy and conservative treatment were selected to use sufficient internal decompression and preserve their skull. Results: All 6 patients survived and were discharged. There were no common postoperative complications such as subdural effusion. During the 9-month follow-up period, 5 of 6 patients survived. One patient was able to walk around. Conclusion: For patients with malignant cerebral edema caused by massive cerebral infarction, simple internal decompression is recommended with a high survival rate and few complications.
[1] | Arnaout, O.M., Aoun, S.G., Batjer, H.H., et al. (2011) Decompressive Hemicraniectomy after Malignant Middle Cere-bral Artery Infarction: Rationale and Controversies. Neurosurgical Focus, 30, E18.
https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.3.FOCUS1160 |
[2] | 宋光太, 杨力军, 胡居恒, 等. 标准大骨瓣减压术治疗大面积脑梗死的临床研究[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2011, 16(5): 579-581. |
[3] | 何世东, 潘晓峰, 田勇. 标准大骨瓣减压术治疗大面积脑梗塞7例分析[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2012, 17(5): 652-653. |
[4] | Algethamy, H.M., Samman, A., Baeesa, S.S., et al. (2017) Decompressive Hemicraniectomy for Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction. Experience from the Western Province of Saudi Arabia. Neurosciences (Riyadh), 22, 192-197. https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2017.3.20170051 |
[5] | 袁军辉, 石东付, 吕岩松, 等. 标准去大骨瓣减压加内减压术治疗急性大面积脑梗死的临床经验分析[J]. 中国急救医学, 2018, 38(2): 169-173. |
[6] | 董志领, 李花莲, 韩丽丽, 等. 微创碎吸引流术治疗大面积脑梗死60例疗效分析[J]. 脑与神经疾病杂志, 2008, 16(4): 474. |
[7] | Moughal, S., Trippier, S., Al-Mousa, A., et al. (2020) Strokecromy for Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction: Experience and Meta-Analysis of Current Evidence. Journal of Neurology, 269, 149-158.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10358-9 |
[8] | Ong, C.J., Gluckstein, J., Laurido-Soto, O., et al. (2017) En-hanced Detection of Edema in Malignant Anterior Circulation Stroke (EDEMA) Score: A Risk Prediction Tool. Stroke, 48, 1969-1972.
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016733 |
[9] | Bar, M., Mikulik, R., Skolouodik, D., et al. (2010) Na-tionwide Study of Decompressive Surgery for Malignant Supratentorial Infraction in the Czech Republic: Utilization and Outcome Predictors. Journal of Neurosurgery, 113, 897-900.
https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.10.JNS09888 |
[10] | Wagner, S., Schnippering, H., Aschoff, A., et al. (2001) Subop-timum Hemicraniectomy as a Cause of Additional Cerebral Lesions in Patients with Malignant Infarction of the Middle Cerebral Artery. Journal of Neurosurgery, 94, 693-696. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2001.94.5.0693 |
[11] | Robertson, S.C., Lennarson, P., Hasan, D., et al. (2004) Clinical Course and Surgical Management of Massive Cerebral Infarction. Neurosurgery, 55, 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000126875.02630.36 |
[12] | 刘文, 刘佰运. 梗死灶切除治疗重型颅脑外伤合并大面积脑梗死[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2005, 10(12): 538 -540. |
[13] | 赵刚, 孙继程, 刘帅, 等. 大骨瓣减压术加内减压术治疗急性大面积脑梗死30例的临床经验总结[J]. 中国现代医生, 2015, 53(24): 38-41. |
[14] | 李涛. 去骨瓣减压术联合颞肌脑表面贴附术治疗老年大面积脑梗死患者22例[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2012, 32(18): 4023 -4024. |
[15] | 戴永建, 刘岳, 罗俊杰. 标准大骨瓣减压术治疗大面积脑梗死疗效观察[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2015, 24(9): 960 -962. |
[16] | Chang, V., Hartzfeld, P., Langlois, M., et al. (2010) Outcomes of Cranial Repair after Craniectomy. Journal of Neurosurgery, 112, 1120-1124. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.6.JNS09133 |
[17] | Kilincer, C., Simsek, O., Hamamcioglu, M.K., et al. (2005) Contra-lateral Subdural Effusion after Aneurysm Surgery and Decompressive Craniectomy: Case Report and Review of the Lit-erature. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 107, 412-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.09.018 |
[18] | Gupta, R., Connolly, E.S., Mayer, S., et al. (2004) Hemicrani-ectomy for Massive Middle Cerebral Artery Territory Infarction: A Systematic Review. Stroke, 35, 539-543. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000109772.64650.18 |