Biochar offers several benefits as a soil amendment, including increased soil fertility, carbon sequestration, and water-holding capacity in nutrient-poor soils. Here, we performed a series of enzyme assays on pine biochar-amended soils, comparing multiple enzyme activities (EAs) simultaneously determined in the same soil sample vs. the sum of individual EAs involved in the C, N, S, and P cycles to provide information of the impacts of biochar on biogeochemical cycling. The combination of these four EAs has been considered an indicator of soil health due to their role in the reactions that release bioavailable nutrients in the cycling of C (β-glucosidase), N and C (β-glucosaminidase), P (acid phosphomonoesterase), and S (aryl-sulfatase) in soils. Comparisons of the theoretical EAs and the CNPS activity assay approaches in the biochar-modified soil revealed similar activity trends with the different concentrations of added biochar. Two years after adding biochar, study results showed the amended soils did not retain more pNP substrate than the un-amended control soils in three different pH buffers (5.5, 5.8, and 6.5) commonly used in EA reactions. Finally, we performed a third experiment to determine if the biochar previously added to the EAs interfered with the reactions’ enzyme or substrate. The results indicated that greater activity was measured using the combined assay, which suggests the CNPS activity method was less affected by biochar than the individual EAs. Our findings indicate that the potential soil biochemical-health index, CNPS activity (combination of four enzymes) assay is more robust than the individual EAs and can be used as an alternative tool to monitor soil functioning.
References
[1]
Buol, S.W., Southard, R.J., Graham, R.C. and McDaniel, P.A. (2011) Soil Genesis and Classification. 6th Edition, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470960622
[2]
Gregorich, E.G., Carter, M.R., Angers, D.A., Monreal, C. and Ellert, B. (1994) Towards a Minimum Data Set to Assess Soil Organic Matter Quality in Agricultural Soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 74, 367-385. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss94-051
[3]
Karlen, D.L., Veum, S.K., Sudduth, K., Obrycki, J.F. and Nunes, M.R. (2019) Soil Health Assessment: Past Accomplishments, Current Activities, and Future Opportunities. Soil and Tillage Research, 195, Article ID: 104365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104365
[4]
Ketcheson, J.W. (1980) Long-Range Effects of Intensive Cultivation and Monoculture on the Quality of Southern Ontario Soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 60, 403-410. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss80-045
[5]
Patzel, N., Sticher, H. and Karlen, D.L. (2000) Soil Fertility—Phenomenon and Concept. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 163, 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2624(200004)163:2<129::AID-JPLN129>3.0.CO;2-D
[6]
Kittredge, H.A., Cannone, T., Funk, J. and Chapman, S. (2018) Soil Respiration and Extracellular Enzyme Production Respond Differently across Seasons to Elevated Temperatures. Plant and Soil, 425, 351-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3591-z
[7]
Sinsabaugh, R.L. (2010) Phenol Oxidase, Peroxidase and Organic Matter Dynamics of Soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 42, 391-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.014
[8]
Bowker, M.A., Mau, R.L., Maestre, F.T., Escolar, C. and Catillo-Monroy A.P. (2011) Functional Properties Reveal Unique Ecological Roles of Various Biological Soil Crust Organisms. Functional Ecology, 25, 787-789. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01835.x
[9]
Bailey, V.L., Fansler, S.J., Stegen, J.C. and McCue, L.A. (2013) Linking Microbial Community Structure to B-Glucosidic Functions in Soil Aggregates. The ISME Journal, 7, 2044-2053. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.87
[10]
de Gannes, V., Bekele, I., Dipchansingh, D., Wuddivira, M.N., De Cairies, S., Boman, M. and Hickey, W.J. (2016) Microbial Community Structure and Function of Soil Following Ecosystem Conversion from Native Forests to Teak Plantation Forests. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, Article No. 1976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01976
[11]
Bandick, A.K. and Dick, R.P. (1999) Field Management Effects on Soil Enzyme Activities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31, 1471-1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00051-6
[12]
Dick, R.P. and Burns, R.G. (2011) A Brief History of Soil Enzymology Research. In: Methods of Soil Enzymology, Vol. 9, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser9.c1
[13]
Acosta-Martínez, V., Cano, A. and Johnson, J.M.F. (2018) Simultaneous Determination of Multiple Soil Enzyme Activities for Soil Health-Biogeochemical Indices. Applied Soil Ecology, 126, 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.11.024
[14]
Pérez-Guzmán, L., Lower, B.H. and Dick, R.P. (2020) Corn and Hardwood Biochars Affected Soil Microbial Community and Enzyme Activities. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, 3, Article ID: e20082. https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20082
[15]
Acosta-Martínez, V., Pérez-Guzmán, L. and Johnson, J.M.F. (2019) Simultaneous Determination of β-Glucosidase, β-Glucosaminidase, Acid Phosphomonoesterase, and Arylsulfatase Activities in a Soil Sample for a Biogeochemical Cycling Index. Applied Soil Ecology, 142, 72-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.05.001
[16]
García-Jaramillo, M., Meyer, K.M., Phillips, C.L., et al. (2021) Biochar Addition to Vineyard Soils: Effects on Soil Functions, Grape Yield and Wine Quality. Biochar, 3, 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-021-00118-x
[17]
Ahmed, H.P. and Schoenau, J.J. (2015) Effects of Biochar on Yield, Nutrient Recovery, and Soil Properties in a Canola (Brassica Napus L.)-Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) Rotation Grown Under Controlled Environmental Conditions. BioEnergy Research, 8, 1183-1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9574-x
[18]
Lehmann, J., Rillig, M.C., Thies, J., Masiello, C.A., Hockaday, W.C. and Crowley, D. (2011) Biochar Effects on Soil Biota—A Review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43, 1812-1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022
[19]
Gao, S., DeLuca, T.H., Cleveland, C.C. (2019) Biochar Additions Alter Phosphorus and Nitrogen Availability in Agricultural Ecosystems: A Meta-Analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 654, 463-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.124
[20]
Yu, H., Zou, W., Chen, J., Chen, H., Yu, Z., Huang, J., Tang, H., Wei, X. and Gao, B. (2019) Biochar Amendment Improves Crop Production in Problem Soils: A Review. Journal of Environmental Management, 232, 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.117
[21]
Lopes, J.I., Arrobas, M., Raimundo, S., Goncalves, A., Brito, C., Martins, S., Pinto, L., Moutinho-Pereira, J., Correia, C.M. and Rodrigues, M.A. (2022) Photosynthesis, Yield, Nutrient Availability and Soil Properties after Biochar, Zeolites or Mycorrhizal Inoculum Application to a Mature Rainfed Olive Orchard. Agriculture, 12, Article No. 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12020171
[22]
Jeffery, S., Verheijen, F.G.A., van der Velde, M., Bastos, A.C. (2011) A Quantitative Review of the Effects of Biochar Application to Soils on Crop Productivity Using Meta-Analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 144, 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015
[23]
Wang, Y., Ma, Z., Wang, X., Sun, Q., Dong, H., Wang, G., Chen, X., Yin, C., Han, Z. and Mao, Z. (2019) Effects of Biochar on the Growth of Apple Seedlings, Soil Enzyme Activities and Fungal Communities in Replant Disease Soil. Scientia Horticulturae, 256, Article ID: 108641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108641
[24]
Li, Y., Li, Y., Chang, S.X., Yang, Y., Fu, S., Jiang, P., Luo, Y., Yang, M., Chen, Z. and Hu, S. (2018) Biochar Reduces Soil Heterotrophic Respiration in a Subtropical Plantation through Increasing Soil Organic Carbon Recalcitrancy and Decreasing Carbon-Degrading Microbial Activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 122, 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.04.019
[25]
Foster, E.J., Hansen, N., Wallenstein, M. and Cotrufo, M.F. (2016) Biochar and Manure Amendments Impact Soil Nutrients and Microbial Enzymatic Activities in a Semi-Arid Irrigated Maize Cropping System. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 233, 404-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.09.029
[26]
Lu, H., Lashari, M.S., Liu, X., Ji, H., Li, L., Zheng, J., Kibue, G.W., Joseph, S. and Pan, G. (2015) Changes in Soil Microbial Community Structure and Enzyme Activity With Amendment of Biochar-Manure Compost and Pyroligneous Solution in a Saline Soil from Central China. European Journal of Soil Biology, 70, 67-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2015.07.005
[27]
Lammirato, G., Miltner, A. and Kaestner, M. (2011) Effects of Wood Char and Activated Carbon on the Hydrolysis of Cellobiose by β-Glucosidase from Aspergillus Niger. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43, 1936-1942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.05.021
[28]
Czimczik, C.I. and Masiello CA. (2007) Controls on Black Carbon Storage in Soils. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 21, Article No. GB3005. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002798
[29]
Song, D., Xi, X., Huang, S., Liang, G., Sun, J., Zhou, W. and Wang, X. (2016). Short-Term Responses of Soil Respiration and C-Cycle Enzyme Activities to Additions of Biochar and Urea in a Calcareous Soil. PLOS ONE, 11, Article ID: e0161694. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161694
[30]
Foster, E.J., Fogle, E. and Co-trufo, M.F. (2018) Sorption to Biochar Impacts β-Glucosidase and Phosphatase Enzyme Activities. Agriculture, 8, Article No. 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture8100158
[31]
Swaine, M., Obrike, R., Clark, J.M. and Shaw, L.J. (2013) Biochar Altera-tion of the Sorption of Substrates and Products in Soil Enzyme Assays. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2013, Article ID: 968682, 5 p. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/968682
[32]
Bailey, V.L., Fansler, S.J., Smith, J.L. and Bolton, H. (2011) Reconciling Apparent Variability in Effects of Biochar Amendment on Soil Enzyme Activities by Assay Optimization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43, 296-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.10.014
[33]
Trigo, C., Cox, L. and Spokas, K. (2016) Influence of Pyrolysis Temperature and Hardwood Species on Resulting Biochar Properties and Their Effect on Azimsulfuron Sorption as Compared to Other Sorbents. Science of the Total Environment, 566-567, 1454-1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.027
[34]
Jindo, K. and Sonoki, T. (2019) Comparative Assessment of Biochar Stability Using Multiple Indicators. Agronomy, 9, Article No. 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9050254
[35]
Zhang, L., Jing, Y., Xiang, Y., Zhang, R. and Lu, H. (2018) Responses of Soil Microbial Community Structure Changes and Activities to Biochar Addition: A Meta-Analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 643, 926-935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.231
[36]
Alster, C., Koyama, A., Johnson, N.G., Wallenstein, M.D. and Von Fischer, J.C. (2016) Temperature Sensitivity of Soil Microbial Communities: An Application of Macromolecular Rate Theory to Microbial Respiration. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 121, 1420-1433. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003343
[37]
Sinsabaugh, R.L., Lauber, C.L., Weintraub, M.N., Ahmed, B., Allison, S.D., Crenshaw, C., Contosta, A.R., Cusack, D., Frey, S., Gallo, M.E., et al. (2008) Stoichiometry of Soil Enzyme Activity at Global Scale. Ecology Letters, 11, 1252-1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01245.x
[38]
Paz-Ferreiro, J., Trasar-Cepeda, C., Leirós, M.C., Seoane, S. and Gil-Sotres, F. (2009) Biochemical Properties in Managed Grassland Soils in a Temperate Humid Zone: Modifications of Soil Quality as a Consequence of Intensive Grassland Use. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 45, 711-722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-009-0382-y
[39]
Frene, J.P., Frazier, M., Liu, S., Clark, B., Parker, M. and Gardner, T. (2021) Early Effect of Pine Biochar on Peach-Tree Planting on Microbial Community Composition and Enzymatic Activity. Applied Sciences, 11, Article No. 1473. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041473
[40]
Luo, L. and Gu, J.L. (2016) Alteration of Extracellular Enzyme Activity and Microbial Abundance by Biochar Addition: Implication for Carbon Sequestration in Subtropical Mangrove Sediment. Journal of Environmental Management, 182, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.040
[41]
Tabatabai, M.A. (1994) Soil Enzymes. In: Weaver, R.W., Angle, J.S. and Bottomley, P.S., Eds., Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2. Microbiological and Biochemical Properties, Vol. 5, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, 775-833. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.2.c37
[42]
Parham, J.A. and Deng, S.P. (2000) Detection, Quantification and Characterization of β-Glucosaminidase Activity in Soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32, 1183-1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00034-1
[43]
Gardner, T., Acosta-Martinez, V., Senwo, Z. and Dowd, S.E. (2011) Soil Rhizosphere Microbial Communities and Enzyme Activities under Organic Farming in Alabama. Diversity, 3, 308-328. https://doi.org/10.3390/d3030308
[44]
Hayano, K. (1973) A Method for Determination of β-Glucosidase Activity in Soil. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 19, 130-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.1973.10432524
[45]
Di Rienzo, J.A., Casanoves, F., Balzarini, M.G., Gonzalez, L., Tablada, M. and Robledo, C.W. (2013) InfoStat Versión. Grupo InfoStat, Córdoba.
[46]
Luo, Y., Hui, D. and Zhang, D. (2006) Elevated CO2 Stimulates Net Accumulations of Carbon and Nitrogen in Land Ecosystems: A Meta-Analysis. Ecology, 87, 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1724
[47]
Tian, J., Wang, J., Dippold, M., Gao, Y., Blagodatskaya, E. and Kuzyakov, Y. (2016) Biochar Affects Soil Organic Matter Cycling and Microbial Functions But Does Not Alter Microbial Community Structure in a Paddy Soil. Science of the Total Environment, 556, 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.010
[48]
Frene, J.P., Frazier, M., Liu, S., Clark, B., Parker, M. and Gardner, T.G. (2020) Early Response of Organic Matter Dynamics to Pine-Biochar in Sandy Soil under Peach Trees. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, 3, Article ID: e200094. https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20094
[49]
Demisie, W., Lio, Z. and Zhang, M. (2014) Effect of Biochar on Carbon Fractions and Enzyme Activity of Red Soil. CATENA, 121, 214-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.05.020
