全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

职业董秘与投资者保护的关系研究——信息披露质量的中介作用
Research on the Relationship between Professional Secretaries and Investor Protection—The Intermediary Role of Information Disclosure Quality

DOI: 10.12677/BGlo.2022.104009, PP. 74-83

Keywords: 职业董秘,信息披露质量,投资者保护,中介作用
Professional Board Secretary
, Quality of Information Disclosure, Investor Protection, Intermediate Effect

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

针对我国上市公司信息披露质量不高,投资者利益不断受到侵害的现状,本文通过分析职业董秘与投资者保护的关系以及信息披露质量的中介作用,揭示了职业董秘对投资者保护的影响机制,并利用我国中小板上市公司样本验证了这一机制的存在。结果表明:职业董秘有利于上市公司的投资者保护;不同专业背景职业董秘的投资者保护存在差异;信息披露质量是职业董秘影响投资者保护的部分中介变量。本文结论既可以为上市公司合理选择和聘用董秘提供建议,又可以为监管机构引导和规范董秘行为提供决策依据,还能够为研究投资者保护提供一些可借鉴的思路和经验证据。
In view of the current situation that the quality of information disclosure of listed companies in China is not high and the interests of investors are constantly infringed, by analyzing the relationship between professional board secretaries and investor protection and the mediating role of information disclosure quality, this paper reveals the impact mechanism of professional board secretaries on investor protection and verifies the existence of this mechanism by using a sample of China’s small and medium-sized board listed companies. The results show that: professional board secretaries are beneficial to the investor protection of listed companies; there are differences in investor protection of professional board secretaries with different professional backgrounds; the quality of information disclosure is part of the mediating variable that professional board secretaries affect investor protection. The conclusions of this paper can not only provide suggestions for listed companies to reasonably select and employ board secretaries but also provide a decision-making basis for regulatory agencies to guide and regulate board secretaries’ behavior and can also provide some ideas and empirical evidence for the study of investor protection.

References

[1]  李维安, 张立党, 张苏. 公司治理、投资者异质信念与股票投资风险——基于中国上市公司的实证研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2012(6): 135-146.
[2]  吴育辉, 张秋煌, 魏志华. 职业董秘与企业IPO进度[C]//第七届公司治理国际研讨会论文集. 2013: 6-7.
[3]  陈健. 拟上市公司董事会秘书职业发展趋势研究[J]. 产业与科技论坛, 2013(14): 107-110.
[4]  张宏亮, 崔学刚. 投资者关系、公司价值与投资者保护——基于金牌董秘评比结果的实证研究[J]. 财贸研究, 2009(4): 138-144.
[5]  杜兴强, 冯文滔, 裴红梅. IPO公司“董秘”非正常离职的经济后果: 基于中国资本市场的经验证据 [J]. 投资研究, 2013(8): 47-64.
[6]  高强, 伍利娜. 兼任董秘能提高信息披露质量?——对拟修订《上市规则》关于董秘任职资格新要求的实证检验[J]. 会计研究, 2008(1): 47-54.
[7]  周开国, 李涛, 张燕. 董事会秘书与信息披露质量[J]. 金融研究, 2011(7): 167-181.
[8]  翟光宇, 武力超, 唐大鹏. 中国上市银行董事会秘书持股降低了信息披露质量吗?——基于2007~2012年季度数据的实证分析[J]. 经济评论, 2014(2): 127-138.
[9]  周繁, 张馨艺. 公允价值与稳健性: 理论探讨与经验证据——2009年会计理论专题学术研讨会综述[J]. 会计研究, 2009(7): 89-91.
[10]  李维安, 王倩. 投资者保护微观效应文献综述: 基于影响机制复杂性与结果多样性的新观察[J]. 南开管评论, 2011, 14(6): 4-15.
[11]  Elliot, R.K. and Jacobson, P.D. (1994) Cost and Benefits of Business Information Disclosure. Accounting Horizons, 8, 80-96.
[12]  Keim, D.B. and Madhavan, A. (1995) Anatomy of the Trading Process Empirical Evidence on the Behavior of Institutional Traders. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 371-398.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(94)00799-7
[13]  Heflin, F. and Hsu, C. (2008) The Impact of the SEC’s Regulation of Non-GAAP Disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12, 349-365.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.07.002
[14]  杜兴强, 周泽将. 信息披露质量与代理成本的实证研究——基于深圳证券交易所信息披露考评的经验证据[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2009(12): 76-82.
[15]  Dechow, P.M. and Dichev, I.D. (2002) The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors. Accounting Review, 77, 35-59.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.35
[16]  La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1998) Law and Finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113 -1115.
https://doi.org/10.1086/250042
[17]  沈艺峰, 许年行, 杨熠. 我国中小投资者法律保护历史事件的实证检验[J]. 经济研究, 2004(9): 90-100.
[18]  许年行, 吴世农. 我国中小投资者法律保护影响股权集中度的变化吗?[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2006(2): 893-922.
[19]  王鹏. 投资者保护、代理成本与公司绩效[J]. 经济研究, 2008(2): 68-82.
[20]  王克敏, 陈井勇. 股权结构、投资者保护与公司绩效[J]. 管理世界, 2004(7): 127-133.
[21]  张人骥, 刘春江. 股权结构、股东保护与上市公司现金持有量[J]. 财贸经济, 2005(2): 3-9.
[22]  姜付秀, 支晓强, 张敏. 投资者利益保护与股权融资成本[J]. 管理世界, 2008(2): 117-125.
[23]  曾昭灶, 李善民, 陈玉罡. 我国控制权转移与投资者保护关系的实证研究[J]. 管理学报, 2012(7): 960-967.
[24]  Bhattacharya, U., Daouk, H. and Welker, M. (2003) The World Price of Earnings Opacity. The Accounting Review, 78, 641-678.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.641
[25]  曾颖, 陆正飞. 信息披露质量与股权融资成本[J]. 经济研究, 2006(2): 69-80.
[26]  DeFond, M., Wong, T.J. and Li, S.H. (2000) The Impact of Improved Auditor Independence on Audit Market Concentration in China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28, 269-305.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(00)00005-7
[27]  李增泉, 孙铮, 王志伟. “掏空”与所有权安排来——来自我国上市公司大股东资金占用的经验证据[J]. 会计研究, 2004(12): 3-13.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133