全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Research on International Carbon Emission Responsibility Based on Tapio Decoupling Model

DOI: 10.4236/lce.2022.134009, PP. 163-180

Keywords: Embodied Carbon, Production-Based Carbon Emissions, Consumption-Based Carbon Emissions, MRIO, Tapio Decoupling, Carbon Emission Responsibility

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Based on the WIOD database, the article uses the MRIO model to analyze the production-based and consumption-based carbon emissions and transfer issues in international trade, measures the carbon emissions generated by the EU, China, India, Japan, Russia, and the US in 2014, uses the Tapio decoupling model to clarify the relationship between economic growth and carbon emissions, and determines the responsibility of carbon emissions in each country (region) using 2013 as the base period. The study found that: China and India are based on the production of carbon emissions. It is found that: production-based carbon emissions are higher than consumption-based emissions in China and India, and the opposite is true for EU, US, Japan, and Russia; developing countries are net exporters of trade-embodied carbon and developed countries are net importers of trade-embodied carbon; and a consumption-based accounting approach is used for EU and China, and a production-based accounting approach is used for India, Russia, Japan, and US.

References

[1]  Adedoyin, F. F., Ozturk, I., Bekun, F. V., Agboola, P. O., & Agboola, M. O. (2021). Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Policy Simulations for Abating Emissions in a Complex Economy: Evidence from the Novel Dynamic ARDL. Renewable Energy, 177, 1408-1420.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.018
[2]  Chang, K. L. et al. (2021). Decomposition and Decoupling Research of Chinese Power Sector Carbon Emissions through the Consumption Accounting Principle. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29, 9080-9096.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14278-7
[3]  Chen, N., Liu, X. M., & Hasebe, I. (2016). A Study on the Responsibility of Carbon emission between China and Japan from the Perspective of Equity. International Trade Issues, No. 7, 84-96.
https://doi.org/10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2016.07.008
[4]  Dong, Y. F. (2021). A Pilot Analysis of the EU Green New Deal. 41-48.
[5]  Eder, P., & Narodoslawsky, M. (1999). What Environmental Pressures Are a Region’s Industries Responsible for? A Method of Analysis with Descriptive Indices and Input-Output Models. Ecological Economics, 29, 359-374.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00092-5
[6]  Ferng, J. J. (2003). Allocating the Responsibility of CO2 Over-Emissions from the Perspectives of Benefit Principle and Ecological Deficit. Ecological Economics, 46, 121-141.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.018
[7]  Han, Z., Chen, Y. H., & Shi, Y. (2018). Measurement and Decomposition of Consumption Carbon Emissions in the Perspective of International Final Demand. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 35, 16.
[8]  Huang, Y. M., & Chen, X. F. (2018). A Study of Trade Implied Pollution Transfer in China. Chinese Journal Population-Resources and Environment, 28, 112-120. (In Chinese)
[9]  Liu, F. Q., Kang, Y. X., & Guo, K. (2022). Is Electricity Consumption of Chinese Counties Decoupled from Carbon Emissions? A Study Based on Tapio Decoupling Index. Energy, 251, Article ID: 123879.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123879
[10]  Liu, Q. N., & Wang, Q. (2017). Sources and Flows of China’s Virtual SO2 Emission Transfers Embodied in Interprovincial Trade: A Multiregional Input-Output Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 735-747.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123879
[11]  Ma, J. M., & Wang, X. Y. (2015). Whether Developed Countries Transfer Carbon Emissions to Developing Countries—Based on the Perspective of Carbon Emission Responsibility Sharing. Economist, No. 6, 95-102.
[12]  Pan, J. H., Phillips, J., & Chen, Y. (2008). China’s Balance of Emissions Embodied in Trade: Approaches to Measurement and Allocating International Responsibility. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24, 354-376.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grn016
[13]  Pang, J., & Zhang, J. Z. (2014). Carbon Emissions Embodied in Sino-EU Trade and the Influence Factors: An Analysis Based on MRIO Model and LMDI Method. International Economics and Trade Research, 30, 51-65.
[14]  Peng, S. J., Zhang, W. C., & Song, C. W. (2015). China’s Production-Based and Consumption-Based Carbon Emissions and Their Determinants. Economic Research Journal, 1, 168-182.
[15]  Peng, S. J., Zhang, W. C., & Wen, R. (2016). National Responsibility Accounting Scheme for Carbon Emissions. Economic Research Journal, 51, 137-150.
[16]  Peters, G. P. (2008). From Production-Based to Consumption-Based National Emission Inventories. Ecological Economics, 65, 13-23.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.014
[17]  Safonov, G., Potashnikov, V., Lugovoy, O., Safonov, M., Dorina, A., & Bolotov, A. (2020). The Low Carbon Development Options for Russia. Climatic Change, 162, 1929-1945.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02780-9
[18]  Sun, C., Ding, D., & Yang, M. (2017). Estimating the Complete CO2 Emissions and the Carbon Intensity in India: From the Carbon Transfer Perspective. Energy Policy, 109, 418-427.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.022
[19]  Tapio, Petri. (2005). Towards a Theory of Decoupling: Degrees of Decoupling in the EU and the Case of Road Traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transport Policy, 12, 137-151.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.001
[20]  Wang, J., Li, Z. G., & Gu, J. J. (2021). Carbon Emission and Economic Growth Decoupling Elasticity and Drivers in BRICS Countries—An Analysis Based on Tapio Decoupling and LMDI Models. World Regional Studies, 30, 501-508. (In Chinese)
[21]  Wang, W., & Hu, Y. (2020). The Measurement and Influencing Factors of Carbon Transfers Embodied in Inter-Provincial Trade in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270, Article ID: 122460.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.001
[22]  Wang, Z. H., & Yang, L. (2015). Delinking Indicators on Regional Industry Development and Carbon Emissions: Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Economic Band Case. Ecological Indicators, 48, 41-48.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.035
[23]  Xue, J., Zhu, D., & Zhao, L. J. (2020). A Study on the Implicit Costs of Environmental Governance Based on Interprovincial Trade Perspective. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 28, 210-219. (In Chinese)
https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.10.021
[24]  Yan, Y. F., Zhao, Z. X., & Wang, R. (2013). A Study on China’s Implicit Carbon and Emission Responsibility in Foreign Trade Based on MRIO Model. World Economy Studies, No. 6, 54-58, 86, 88-89. (In Chinese)
https://doi.org/10.13516/j.cnki.wes.2013.06.001
[25]  Yu, Z. H., Li, W. Q., Xie, F. J., & Liu, H. B. (2014). Analysis of the Decoupling of Economic Growth and Atmospheric Environmental Pollution in Nanjing. Science Technology and Engineering, 14, 320-323. (In Chinese)

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413