全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

A Novel Approach for Optimum Conjunctive Use Management of Groundwater and Surface Water Resources under Uncertainty

DOI: 10.4236/ojmh.2023.131003, PP. 52-75

Keywords: A Novel Approach, Conjunctive Use Management, Retrospective Optimization Approximation (ROA), Uncertainty

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Uncertainty in determining optimum conjunctive water use lies not only on variability of hydrological cycle and climate but also on lack of adequate data and perfect knowledge about groundwater-surface water system interactions, errors in historic data and inherent variability of system parameters both in space and time. Simulation-optimization models are used for conjunctive water use management under uncertain conditions. However, direct application of such approach whereby all realizations are considered at every-iteration of the optimization process leads to a highly computational time-consuming optimization problem as the number of realizations increases. Hence, this study proposes a novel approach—a Retrospective Optimization Approximation (ROA) approach. In this approach, a simulation model was used to determine aquifer system responses (draw-downs) which were assembled as response matrices and incorporated in the optimization model (procedure) as coefficients in the constraints. The sample optimization sub-problems generated, were solved and analyzed through ROA-Active-Set procedure implemented under MATLAB code. The ROA-Active Set procedure solves and evaluates a sequence of sample path optimization sub-problems in an increasing number of realizations. The methodology was applied to a real-world conjunctive water use management problem found in Great Letaba River basin, South Africa. In the River basin, surface water source contributes 87% of the existing un-optimized total conjunctive water use withdrawal rate (6512.04 m3/day) and the remaining 13% is contributed by groundwater source. Through ROA approach, results indicate that the optimum percentages contribution of the surface and subsurface sources to the total water demand are 58% and 42% respectively. This implies that the existing percentage contribution can be increased or reduced by ±29% that is groundwater source can be increased by 29% while the surface water source contribution can be reduced by 29%. This reveals that the existing conjunctive water use practice is unsustainable wherein surface water system is overstressed while groundwater system is under-utilized. Through k-means sampling technique ROA-Active Set procedure was able to attain a converged maximum expected total optimum conjunctive water use withdrawal rate of 4.35 × 104 m3/day within a relatively few numbers of iterations (6 to 8 iterations) in about 2.30 Hrs. In conclusion, results demonstrated that

References

[1]  Gyamfi, C., Ndambuki, J.M. and Salim, R.W. (2016) Hydrological Responses to Land Use/Cover Changes in the Olifants Basin, South Africa. Water, 8, 588.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w8120588
[2]  Kifanyi, G.E. (2018) Optimizing the Conjunctive Use of Surface Water and Groundwater in Water Stressed River Basins: Case of Olifants River Basin, South Africa. PhD Thesis, Tshwane University of Technology, Tshwane.
[3]  Mahjoub, H., Mohammad, M. and Parsinejad, M. (2011) Conjunctive Use Modeling of Groundwater and Surface Water. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 3, 726-734.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2011.310083
[4]  Kifanyi, G.E., Ndambuki, J.M. and Odai, S.N. (2016) A Quantitative Groundwater Resource Management under Uncertainty Using a Retrospective Optimization Framework. Sustainability, 9, 2.
[5]  Ndambuki, J.M., Kifanyi, G.E., Odai, S.N. and Gyamfi, C. (2018) Conjunctive Management of Surface and Groundwater Resources under Uncertainty: A Retrospective Optimization Approach. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 12.
[6]  Regulwar, D.G. and Pradhan, V. S. (2013) Irrigation Planning with Conjunctive Use of Surface and Groundwater Using Fuzzy Resources. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2013, 816-822.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2013.58082
[7]  Safavi, H.R. and Bahreini, G.R. (2009) Conjunctive Simulation of Surface Water and Groundwater Resources under Uncertainty. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transaction B: Engineering, 33, 79-94.
[8]  Ndambuki, J.M. (2001) Multi-Objective Groundwater Quantity Management: A Stochastic Approach. DUP Science, Delft University Press, Delft.
[9]  Schoups, G., Addams, C.L., Minjares, J.L. and Gorelick, S.M. (2006) Sustainable Conjunctive Water Management in Irrigated Agriculture: Model Formulation and Application to the Yaqui Valley. Water Resources Research, 42, W10417.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR004922
[10]  Marques, G. F., Lund, J. R. and Howitt, R. E. (2010) Modelling Conjunctive Use Operations and Farm Decisions with Two-Stage Stochastic Quadratic Programming. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 136, 386-394.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000045
[11]  Schoups, G., Addams, C.L., Minjares, J.L. and Gorelick, S.M. (2006) Reliable Conjunctive Use Rules for Sustainable Irrigated Agriculture and Reservoir Spill Control. Water Resources Research, 42, W12406.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005007
[12]  Kentel, E. and Aral, M.M. (2007) Fuzzy Multi-Objective Decision Making Approach for Groundwater Resources Management. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 12, 206-217.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:2(206)
[13]  Young, R.A. and Bredehoeft, J.D. (1972) Digital Computer Simulation for Solving Management Problems of Conjunctive Groundwater and Surface Water Systems. Water Resources Research, 8, 533-556.
https://doi.org/10.1029/WR008i003p00533
[14]  Provencher, B. and Burt, O. (1994) Approximating the Optimal Groundwater Pumping Policy in a Multi-Aquifer Stochastic Conjunctive Use Setting. Water Resources Research, 30, 833-843.
https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR02683
[15]  Gilling, D., McCarl, A. and Boadu, F. (2001) An Economic, Hydrologic and Environmental Assessment of Water Management Alternative Plans for South Central Texas Region. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 33, 59-68.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800020782
[16]  Wang, H., Ciaurri, D.E., Durlofsky, L.J. and Cominelli, A. (2012) Optimal Well Placement under Uncertainty Using a Retrospective Optimization Framework. SPE Journal, 17, 112-121.
https://doi.org/10.2118/141950-PA
[17]  Gorelick, S.M. (1983) A Review of Distributed Parameter Groundwater Management Modelling Methods. Water Resources Research, 19, 305-319.
https://doi.org/10.1029/WR019i002p00305
[18]  Aguado, E. and Remson, I. (1974) Groundwater Hydraulics in Aquifer Management. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 100, 103-118.
https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0003848
[19]  Peralta R.C., Azarmnia H. and Takahashi, S. (1991) Embedding and Response Matrix Techniques for Maximizing Steady-State Groundwater Extraction: Computational Comparison. Groundwater, 29, 357-364.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1991.tb00526.x
[20]  Gorelick, S.M.A. (1982) Model for Managing Sources of Groundwater Pollution. Water Resources Research, 18, 773-781.
https://doi.org/10.1029/WR018i004p00773
[21]  Ndambuki, J.M., Otieno, F.A.O., Stroet, C.B.M. and Veling, E.J.M. (2000) Groundwater Management under Uncertainty: A Multi-Objective Approach. Water SA, 26, 35-42.
[22]  Wang, H.G. and Schmeiser, B.W. (2008) Discrete Stochastic Optimization Using Linear Interpolation. In: Proceedings Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE Press, Piscataway, 502-508.
https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2008.4736106
[23]  Chen, H. and Schmeiser, B.W. (2001) Stochastic Root Finding via Retrospective Approximation. IIE Transactions, 33, 259-275.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170108936827
[24]  Chen, Y., Oliver, D.S. and Zhang, D. (2009) Efficient Ensemble-Based Closed-Loop Production Optimization. SPE Journal, 14, 634-645.
https://doi.org/10.2118/112873-PA
[25]  Wang, C., Li, G. and Reynolds, A.C. (2009) Production Optimization in Closed-Loop Reservoir Management. SPE Journal, 14, 506-523.
https://doi.org/10.2118/109805-PA
[26]  Güyagüler, B. and Horne, R.N. (2004) Uncertainty Assessment of Well Placement Optimization. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 7, 24-32.
https://doi.org/10.2118/87663-PA
[27]  Onwunalu, J.E. and Durlofsky, L.J. (2010) Application of a Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Determining Optimum Well Location and Type. Computers & Geosciences, 14, 183-198.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-009-9142-1
[28]  Özdogan, U. and Horne, R.N. (2006) Optimization of Well Placement under Time-Dependent Uncertainty. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 9, 135-145.
https://doi.org/10.2118/90091-PA
[29]  Yeten, B., Durlofsky, L.J. and Aziz, K. (2003) Optimization of Nonconventional Well Type, Location, and Trajectory. SPE Journal, 8, 200-210.
https://doi.org/10.2118/86880-PA
[30]  Kifanyi, G.E., Ndambuki, J.M., Odai, S.N. and Gyamfi, C. (2019) Quantitative Management of Groundwater Resources in Regional Aquifers under Uncertainty: A Retrospective Optimization Approach. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 8, 530-540.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.02.005
[31]  DWAF (2006) Letaba Catchment Reserve Determination Study: Groundwater Report. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, South Africa. Final Report February 2006, WSM Civil Engineers, Hydrogeologists and Project Managers (Pty) Ltd., Report No. RDM/B800/02/CON/ COMP/0504.
[32]  DWAF (2003) Luvuvhu/Letaba Water Management Area: Water Resources Situation Assessment. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, South Africa. Report No. P02000/00/0301.
[33]  Holland, M. (2011) Hydrological Characterization of Crystalline Basement Aquifers within the Limpopo Province, South Africa. PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
[34]  GRIP-Limpopo (2013) GRIP Database for Borehole Point Data for the Limpopo Province.
http://griplimpopo.co.za
[35]  Harbaugh, A.W., Banta, E.R., Hill, M.C. and McDonald, M.G. (2000) MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model—User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process. OFR, 2000-92.
https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr200092

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413