全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Biochar’s Electrochemical Properties Impact on Methanogenesis: Ruminal vs. Soil Processes

DOI: 10.4236/jacen.2023.121003, PP. 28-43

Keywords: Biochar, Ruminants, Methanogenesis, Soil

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The chemical composition of biochar and the pyrolysis temperature, under which biochar was produced, determine its electrochemical properties. Electrical conductivity, pseudo-capacitance, and double layer capacitance are the three main electrochemical properties of biochar. Due to the electrical conductivity biochar is able to interfere with the electrons flow and play a dual role of an electron donor or an electron acceptor. The average conductivity of biochar is 229.20 S/m. Pseudocapacitance of biochar lets it serve as a hydrogen sink, taking up the hydrogen produced by protozoa and preventing it from participating in methane-producing reactions in the rumen environment. The average value of biochar’s pseudocapacitance is 228 F·g-1. Positive and negative charges get stored due to the absorption of ions onto the carbon surface, which happens because of the existence of double layer capacitance as one of biochar’s electrochemical properties. Biochar’s double layer capacitance values can reach the point of 110.8 F·g-1. The electrochemical properties of biochar are directly co-dependent with its redox potential and pH. Electrical conductivity, pseudocapacitance, and double layer capacitance can significantly influence biochemical processes in the rumen and, thus, need to be studied practically.

References

[1]  Kahraman, O., et al. (2015) Strategies to Reduce Methane Production in Ruminants. Scientific Papers: Series D, Animal Science—The International Session of Scientific Communications of the Faculty of Animal Science, 58.
[2]  Sejian, V., Ezeji, T., Lakritz, J. and Lal, R. (2012) Forage and Flax Seed Impact on Enteric Methane Emission in Dairy Cows. Research Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 4, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.3923/rjvs.2011.1.8
[3]  Arslan, C. and Celebi, E. (2017) Studies on Reduction of Ruminal Methane Production in Ruminants. Ataturk Universitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi, 12, 327-337.
https://doi.org/10.17094/ataunivbd.368903
[4]  Sejian, V., Hyder, I., Ezeji, T., et al. (2015) Global Warming: Role of Livestock. In: Sejian, V., et al., Eds., Climate Change Impact on Livestock: Mitigation and Adaptation, Springer, Berlin, 141-162.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2265-1_10
[5]  Somagond, Y.M., et al. (2021) Effect of Dietary Supplementation of Astxanthin, Prill Fat and Their Combination on Antioxidants and Immunity Status of Lactating Buffaloes during Heat Stress. Buffalo Bulletin, 40, 451-463.
[6]  Buccioni, A., et al. (2015) Milk Fatty Acid Composition, Rumen Microbial Population, and Animal Performances in Response to Diets Rich in Linoleic Acid Supplemented with Chestnut or Quebracho Tannins in Dairy Ewes. Journal of Dairy Science, 98, 1145-1156.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8651
[7]  Getabalew, M., Alemneh, T. and Akeberegn, D. (2019) Methane Production in Ruminant Animals: Implication for Their Impact on Climate Change. Concepts of Dairy & Veterinary Sciences, 2, 204-211.
[8]  Thorpe, A. (2009) Enteric Fermentation and Ruminant Eructation: The Role (and Control?) of Methane in the Climate Change Debate. Climatic Change, 93, 407-431.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9506-x
[9]  Li, et al. (2018) Dynamics of Methanogenesis, Ruminal Fermentation and Fiber Digestibility in Ruminants Following Elimination of Protozoa: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 9, 1-9.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0305-6
[10]  Giuburunca, M., et al. (2014) Methane Production in the Rumen and Its Influence on Global Warming. ProEnvironment Promediu, 7, 231-253.
[11]  Nagaraja, T.G. (2016) Microbiology of the Rumen. In: Millen, D.D., et al., Eds., Rumenology, Springer, Cham, 39-61.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30533-2_2
[12]  Dong, D., et al. (2013) Responses of Methane Emissions and Rice Yield to Applications of Biochar and Straw in a Paddy Field. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 13, 1450-1460.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0732-0
[13]  Borchard, N., et al. (2019) Biochar, Soil and Land-Use Interactions That Reduce Nitrate Leaching and N2O Emissions: A Meta-Analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 651, 2354-2364.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.060
[14]  Xu, N., et al. (2016) Effect of Biochar Additions to Soil on Nitrogen Leaching, Microbial Biomass and Bacterial Community Structure. European Journal of Soil Biology, 74, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.02.004
[15]  Lal, R. (2016) Biochar and Soil Carbon Sequestration. In: Guo, M.X., He, Z.Q. and Uchimiya, S.M., Eds., Agricultural and Environmental Applications of Biochar: Advances and Barriers, Vol. 63, Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, 175-197.
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaspecpub63.2014.0042.5
[16]  Chacón, F.J., et al. (2017) Understanding, Measuring and Tuning the Electrochemical Properties of Biochar for Environmental Applications. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 16, 695-715.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-017-9450-1
[17]  Al-Wabel, M.I., et al. (2013) Pyrolysis Temperature Induced Changes in Characteristics and Chemical Composition of biochar Produced from Conocarpus Wastes. Bioresource Technology, 131, 374-379.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.165
[18]  Yang, C.J., et al. (2016) Nitrate and Inhibition of Ruminal Methanogenesis: Microbial Ecology, Obstacles, and Opportunities for Lowering Methane Emissions from Ruminant Livestock. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 132.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00132
[19]  Liao, S., Pan, B., Li, H., et al. (2014) Detecting Free Radicals in Biochars and Determining Their Ability to Inhibit the Germination and Growth of Corn, Wheat and Rice Seedlings. Environmental Science & Technology, 48, 8581-8587.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es404250a
[20]  Joseph, S., et al. (2015) The Electrochemical Properties of Biochars and How They Affect Soil Redox Properties and Processes. Agronomy, 5, 322-340.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy5030322
[21]  Mopton, R.A. (1965) Biochemistry of Quinones.
[22]  Ma, W. and Long, Y.-T. (2014) Quinone/Hydroquinone-Functionalized Biointerfaces for Biological Applications from the Macro-To Nano-Scale. Chemical Society Reviews, 43, 30-41.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CS60174A
[23]  Sousa, E.T., et al. (2012) Evaluation of Thermal Stability of Quinones by Thermal Analysis Techniques. Thermochimica Acta, 529, 1-5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2011.11.012
[24]  Gabhi, R., et al. (2020) Electrical Conductivity of Wood Biochar Monoliths and Its Dependence on Pyrolysis Temperature. Biochar, 2, 369-378.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-020-00056-0
[25]  Dubé, C.D. and Guiot, S.R. (2015) Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer in Anaerobic Digestion: A Review. In: Guebitz, G., Bauer, A., Bochmann, G., Gronauer, A. and Weiss, S., Eds., Biogas Science and Technology, Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, Vol. 151, Springer, Cham, 101-115.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21993-6_4
[26]  Sun, T., Levin, B.D., Guzman, J.J., Enders, A., et al. (2017) Rapid Electron Transfer by the Carbon Matrix in Natural Pyrogenic Carbon. Nature Communications, 8, 14873.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14873
[27]  Gabhi, R.S., Kirk, D.W. and Jia, C.Q. (2017) Preliminary Investigation of Electrical Conductivity of Monolithic Biochar. Carbon, 116, 435-442.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.01.069
[28]  Dehkhoda, A.M., Ellis, N. and Gyenge, E. (2014) Electrosorption on Activated Biochar: Effect of Thermo-Chemical Activation Treatment on the Electric Double Layer Capacitance. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 44, 141-157.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-013-0616-4
[29]  Gupta, R.K., et al. (2015) Biochar Activated by Oxygen Plasma for Supercapacitors. Journal of Power Sources, 274, 1300-1305.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.169
[30]  Conrad, R. (2020) Methane Production in Soil Environments—Anaerobic Biogeochemistry and Microbial Life between Flooding and Desiccation. Microorganisms, 8, 881.
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060881
[31]  Palansooriya, K.N., et al. (2019) Response of Microbial Communities to Biochar-Amended Soils: A Critical Review. Biochar, 1, 3-22.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-019-00009-2
[32]  Popova, M., Morgavi, D.P. and Martin, C. (2013) Methanogens and Methanogenesis in the Rumens and Ceca of Lambs Fed Two Different High-Grain-Content Diets. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 79, 1777-1786.
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03115-12
[33]  Man, K.Y., et al. (2021) Use of Biochar as Feed Supplements for Animal Farming. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 51, 187-217.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2020.1721980
[34]  Gul, S., et al. (2015) Physico-Chemical Properties and Microbial Responses in Biochar-Amended Soils: Mechanisms and Future Directions. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 206, 46-59.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.03.015
[35]  Chen, S., Rotaru, A.-E., Shrestha, P.M., et al. (2014) Promoting Interspecies Electron Transfer with Biochar. Scientific Reports, 4, Article No. 5019.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05019
[36]  Minteer, S.D., et al. (2015) Quinone Electrochemistry: From the Electron Transport Chain to Electron Mediators and Orientational Moieites. ECS Meeting Abstracts. No. 45. IOP Publishing, Bristol.
https://doi.org/10.1149/MA2015-01/45/2307
[37]  Saquing, J.M., Yu, Y.-H. and Chiu, P.C. (2016) Wood-Derived Black Carbon (Biochar) as a Microbial Electron Donor and Acceptor. Environmental Science and Technology Letters, 3, 62-66.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.5b00354
[38]  Greening, C., et al. (2019) Diverse Hydrogen Production and Consumption Pathways Influence Methane Production in Ruminants. The ISME Journal, 13, 2617-2632.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0464-2
[39]  Ishaq, A., Yan, L. and Zhu, D.Z. (2009) The Electrical Conductivity of Carbon Nanotube Sheets by Ion Beam Irradiation. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 267, 1779-1782.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2009.02.061
[40]  Glasser, N.R., Saunders, S.H. and Newman, D.K. (2017) The Colorful World of Extracellular Electron Shuttles. Annual Review of Microbiology, 71, 731.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-090816-093913
[41]  Sathishkumar, K., Li, Y. and Sanganyado, E. (2020) Electrochemical Behavior of Biochar and Its Effects on Microbial Nitrate Reduction: Role of Extracellular Polymeric Substances in Extracellular Electron Transfer. Chemical Engineering Journal, 395, Article ID: 125077.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125077
[42]  Zheng, Y., Kahnt, J., Kwon, I.H., Mackie, R.I. and Thauer, R.K. (2014) Hydrogen Formation and Its Regulation in Ruminococcus albus: Involvement of an Electron-Bifurcating [FeFe]-Hydrogenase, of a Non-Electron-Bifurcating [FeFe]-Hydro- genase, and of a Putative Hydrogen-Sensing [FeFe]-Hydrogenase. Journal of Bacteriology, 196, 3840-3852.
https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.02070-14
[43]  Ramos, S., Schuldiner, S. and Kaback, H.R. (1976) The Electrochemical Gradient of Protons and Its Relationship to Active Transport in Escherichia coli Membrane Vesicles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 73, 1892-1896.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.73.6.1892
[44]  Hillman, D., Lloyd, K., Yarlett, N. and Williams, A.G. (1989) Hydrogen Production by Rumen Holotrich Protozoa: Effects of Oxygen and Implications for Metabolic Control by in Situ Conditions. The Journal of Protozoology, 36, 205-213.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1989.tb01075.x
[45]  Kisidayova, S. and Váradyova, Z. (2004) Potential of Galvanotaxis to Separation and Cleaning of Rumen Ciliates. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 57, 65-68.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2003.11.021
[46]  Porada, S., Weinstein, L., Dash, R., et al (2012) Water Desalination Using Capacitive Deionization with Microporous Carbon Electrodes. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 4, 1194-1199.
https://doi.org/10.1021/am201683j
[47]  Zhao, L.P., et al. (2015) Effects of Nitrate Addition on Rumen Fermentation, Bacterial Biodiversity and Abundance. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 28, 1433.
https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0091
[48]  Singh, B., et al. (2017) Biochar pH, Electrical Conductivity and Liming Potential. In: Singh, B., Camps-Arbestain, M. and Lehmann, J., Eds., Biochar: A Guide to Analytical Methods, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 23-38.
https://doi.org/10.1071/9781486305100
[49]  Wani, I., et al. (2020) Effect of pH, Volatile Content, and Pyrolysis Conditions on Surface Area and O/C and H/C Ratios of Biochar: Towards Understanding Performance of Biochar Using Simplified Approach. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, 24, Article ID: 04020048.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000545
[50]  Tomczyk, A., Sokolowska, Z. and Boguta, P. (2020) Biochar Physicochemical Properties: Pyrolysis Temperature and Feedstock Kind Effects. Reviews in Environmental Science and BioTechnology, 19, 191-215.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-020-09523-3
[51]  Prévoteau, A., et al. (2016) The Electron Donating Capacity of Biochar Is Dramatically Underestimated. Scientific Reports, 6, Article No. 32870.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32870

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413