全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Performance Evaluation of Real Time Polymerase Reaction Assay (SCODA) for Detection of SARS-CoV-2

DOI: 10.4236/aid.2023.131003, PP. 21-30

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, RT-qPCR, Sensitivity, Specificity, SCODA, Performance

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

In order to robustly detect and quantify gene expression from small amounts of RNA, amplification of the gene transcript is necessary. Real Time PCR is useful for detection and quantification of genetic constitution of pathogens. This technique amplifies a tiny DNA target million or billion times in such a way that it can be easily studied by scientists. Availability of highly sensitive and specific assay for the detection of SARS-Cov-2 and easy accessibility of such was necessary for early diagnosis and effective management of COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance characteristic of SCODA. Validation of SCODA was performed using synthesized standards and clinical samples previously tested using a commercially approved COVID-19 RT-qPCR detection kit (LifeRiver). The assay showed a linearity of 98.2% on the ORF1ab target and 99.8% on the N-gene target. The sensitivity and specificity were both 100%. Analysis for the LoD95 produced 74.04 (CI: 25 - 1000) cp/μl on ORF1ab gene and 1.119 (CI: 1 - 1) cp/μl on N-gene target with a precision of CV ≤ 3%. SCODA showed high comparable performance in comparison with LifeRiver and other commercial COVID-19 RT-qPCR test kits.

References

[1]  Lok, A.S. and McMahon, B.J. (2007) Chronic Hepatitis B. Hepatology, 45, 507-539.
[2]  Onwuamah, C.K., Okwuraiwe, AP., et al. (2021) Comparative Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time PCR Diagnostic Assays on Samples from Lagos, Nigeria. PLOS ONE, 16, e0246637.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246637
[3]  Hue, E.S., Fortier, C.I., et al. (2016) Development and Validation of a Quantitative PCR Method for Equid Herpesvirus-2 Diagnostics in Respiratory Fluids. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 109, e53672.
https://doi.org/10.3791/53672-v
[4]  Al-Saadi, M.H. (2020) Development of In-House Taqman qPCR Assay to Detect Equine Herpesvirus-2 in Al-Qadisiyah City. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 34, 365-371.
https://doi.org/10.33899/ijvs.2019.126076.1229
[5]  CLSI EP17-A2. (2012) Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
[6]  Altman, D.G. and Bland, J.M. (1994) Diagnostic Tests. 1: Sensitivity and Specificity. BMJ, 308, 1552.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1552
[7]  Corman, V.M., Landt, O., et al. (2020) Detection of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by Real-Time RT-PCR. Eurosurveillance, 25, 2000045.
https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045
[8]  Asai, T. (2021) COVID-19: Accurate Interpretation of Diagnostic Tests—A Statistical Point of View. Journal of Anesthesia, 35, 328-332.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02875-8

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133