Due to the lack of legislation on international sports arbitration
institutions and arbitration rules in China,
international sports arbitration activities usually lack direct legal
support. However, as China successfully hosted the Olympic Games and the Winter
Olympic Games successively, Beijing has become
the only “Double Olympic City” in the history of the Olympic
Games, contributing to the development of international sports arbitration. China has
the experience in handling and resolving international sports disputes, and has
a stronger motivation to promote and establish better international sports
arbitration rules. In 2022, relevant Chinese institutions and organizations
have successively passed the new Sports Law(Sports Law), Organizational Rules of the China
Sports Arbitration Commission (Draft
for Comment)(Organizational Rules) and Rules of Sports
Arbitration (Draft for Comment)(Arbitration Rules), and the Chinese Sports
Arbitration Rules. This is undoubtedly important progress in the
integration of China’s sports arbitration rules with international
rules, but it is still worthy of our in-depth consideration in terms of
the required conditions, specific paths and supporting systems for the
development of international sports arbitration in China.
References
[1]
Bai, X. Y. (2022). The Research of Internationalization of China’s Future Legal Services from the Olympic Dispute Resolution System. China’s Foreign Trade, No. 3, 36-39. (In Chinese)
[2]
Chen, S., Li, Z. B., & Dai, T. X. (2003). A Study on Arbitration Regulations in Sports Laws. Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education, 37, 31-34. (In Chinese)
[3]
General Administration of Sport of China (2023). The Total Scale of the National Sports Industry Will Exceed 3 Trillion RMB in 2021. (In Chinese) https://www.sport.gov.cn/n20001280/n20067608/n20067635/c25065804/content.html
[4]
Guo, S. L. (2004). Consummating Chinese Legal Case Vote System. Journal of Shanghai University of Political Science & Law, 19, 61-66. (In Chinese)
[5]
Jiang, S. B., & Zhu, H. J. (2022). Thoughts on Enhancing China's Discourse Power in International Sports Arbitration. Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education, 56, 20-27, 35. (In Chinese)
[6]
Li, Z. (2022). Establishment of Independent Sports Arbitration in China under the Background of Amendment. Legal Science, 483, 162-175. (In Chinese)
[7]
Shang, B. W., & Chen, Y. R. (2022). Examining the Evolutionary Logic and Realistic Approach of Sports Arbitration from the Perspective of Legal Value Goals. Commercial Arbitration & Mediation, No. 2, 53-68. (In Chinese)
[8]
Su, M. Z. (1996). An Introduction to the International Sports Arbitration System. Peking University Law Journal, No. 6, 36-41. (In Chinese)
[9]
Wang, J. H., & Zhao, Y. (2018). Progress, Difficulties and Prospects of China’s Sports Rule of Law in the 40 Years of Reform and Opening up. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 5, 2. (In Chinese)
[10]
Xi, J. P. (2022). Hold the Great Banner of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics and Work Together to Build a Modern Socialist Country in an All-Round Way. Report at the Twentieth National Congress of the Communist Party of China. (In Chinese) http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-10 /25/content_5721685.htm
[11]
Xiong, Y. Z. (2018). Judicial Review of the Principle of Right of Hearing in Sports Arbitration. Journal of Tianjin University of Sport, 33, 466-471, 484. (In Chinese)
[12]
Zhang, C. L. (2011). Demonstration of the Legitimacy of Compulsory Sports Arbitration Agreements—A Study on the Effectiveness of CAS Arbitration Clauses and Its Enlightenment to China. Sports and Science, 2, 26. (In Chinese)
[13]
Zhang, L. F. (2019). Research on the Construction of Brand Courses in Sports Law Discipline Construction—Taking Hulunbuir University as an Example. Journal of Hulunbuir University, 27, 104-106, 117. (In Chinese)
[14]
Zhao, Y. (2016). Justice in the Sport Governance by Law: Based on the Observation of Adjudicative Documents from Chinese Law Courts. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 40, 30-36. (In Chinese)
