Highly dynamic physiology limits our ability to
understand and compare durations of plant physiological and human physiological
processes in concert. In this study, I used literature data and examined a
reproductive process, fruiting, for deciduous rubber trees from two tropical
rubber plantations grown in different geographical locations. In particular, I
focused on fruiting timings and found that fruiting in rubber trees occurs
within eight to nine months from the time when the rubber tree is dormant. The
duration of this interesting physiological process is analogous to a situation,
where women take about nine months to deliver a baby following fertilization. Based
on the data, I generalize (“extrapolate”) that every deciduous tree fruiting
takes about eight to nine months since it is dormant. I recommend that the
fruiting process be represented in earth system models for deciduous trees. I
also suggest follow-up work that can be done in this field of research.
References
[1]
Kromdijk, J., Głowacka, K., Leonelli, L., et al. (2016) Improving Photosynthesis and Crop Productivity by Accelerating Recovery from Photoprotection. Science, 354, 857-861. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai8878
[2]
Keeling, R.F. and Shertz, S.R. (1992) Seasonal and Interannual Variations in Atmospheric Oxygen and Implications for the Global Carbon Cycle. Nature, 358, 723-727. https://doi.org/10.1038/358723a0
[3]
Le Quéré, C. andrew, R.M., Canadell, J.G., et al. (2016) Global Carbon Budget 2016. Earth System Science Data, 8, 605-649. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-605-2016
[4]
Singh, O.P., Howe, T.A. and Malarvili, M. (2018) Real-Time Human Respiration Carbon Dioxide Measurement Device for Cardiorespiratory Assessment. Journal of Breath Research, 12, Article ID: 026003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/aa8dbd
[5]
Cernusak, L.A., Haverd, V., Brendel, O., et al. (2019) Robust Response of Terrestrial Plants to Rising CO2. Trends in Plant Science, 24, 578-586.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.04.003
[6]
Chapin, F.S. and Eviner, V.T. (2014) 10.6. Biogeochemical Interactions Governing Terrestrial Net Primary Production. In: Holland, H.D. and Turekian, K.K., Eds., Treatise on Geochemistry, 2nd Edition, Elsevier, Oxford, 189-216.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.00806-8
[7]
Dyson, B. and Johnson, G. (2014) Photosynthesis: Ecology. eLS.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0003198.pub2
[8]
McElrone, A.J., Choat, B., Gambetta, G.A. and Brodersen, C.R. (2013) Water Uptake and Transport in Vascular Plants. Nature Education Knowledge, 4, 6.
[9]
IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva.
[10]
Donina, Z.A. (2011) Intersystem Relationship between Respiration and Blood Circulation. Human Physiology, 37, 229-239.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119711020034
[11]
Ivell, R. and Anand-Ivell, R. (2021) The Physiology of Reproduction—Quo vadis? Frontiers in Physiology, 12, Article ID: 650550.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.650550
[12]
Carstensen, A., Herdean, A., Schmidt, S.B., et al. (2018) The Impacts of Phosphorus Deficiency on the Photosynthetic Electron Transport Chain. Plant Physiology, 177, 271-284. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01624
[13]
Farquhar, G.D., von Caemmerer, S. and Berry, J.A. (1980) A Biochemical Model of Photosynthetic CO2 Assimilation in Leaves of C3 Species. Planta, 149, 78-90.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386231
[14]
Blackmon, M.B. (2001) The Community Climate System Model. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 82, 2357-2376.
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<2357:TCCSM>2.3.CO;2
[15]
Tjiputra, J.F., Roelandt, C., Bentsen, M., et al. (2013) Evaluation of the Carbon Cycle Components in the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM). Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 301-325. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-301-2013
[16]
Lawrence, D.M., Fisher, R.A., Koven, C.D., et al. (2019) The Community Land Model Version 5: Description of New Features, Benchmarking, and Impact of Forcing Uncertainty. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11, 4245-4287.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001583
[17]
Ziegler, A.D., Fox, J.M. and Xu, J. (2009) The Rubber Juggernaut. Science, 324, 1024-1025. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1173833
[18]
Yeang, H.-Y. (2007) Synchronous Flowering of the Rubber Tree (Hevea brasiliensis) Induced by High Solar Radiation Intensity. New Phytologist, 175, 283-289.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02089.x
Ali, A.A., Fan, Y., Corre, M.D., et al. (2022) Implementing a New Rubber Plant Functional Type in the Community Land Model (CLM5) Improves Accuracy of Carbon and Water Flux Estimation. Land, 11, 183.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020183
[21]
Kotowska, M.M., Leuschner, C., Triadiati, T. and Hertel, D. (2016) Conversion of Tropical Lowland Forest Reduces Nutrient Return through Litterfall, and Alters Nutrient Use Efficiency and Seasonality of Net Primary Production. Oecologia, 180, 601-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3481-5
[22]
Song, Q.-H., Tan, Z.-H., Zhang, Y.-P., et al. (2013) Do the Rubber Plantations in Tropical China Act as Large Carbon Sinks? iForest—Biogeosciences and Forestry, 7, 42-47. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0891-007
[23]
Mund, M., Herbst, M., Knohl, A., et al. (2020) It Is Not Just a “Trade-Off”: Indications for Sink- and Source-Limitation to Vegetative and Regenerative Growth in an Old-Growth Beech Forest. New Phytologist, 226, 111-125.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16408
