|
基于RWEQ的土壤粉砂和碳酸钙与土壤可蚀性关系研究
|
Abstract:
我国是世界上土壤侵蚀面积最大的国家之一,因此我国学者对于土壤侵蚀进行了大量的研究。本文基于修正风蚀模型(RWEQ)对土壤粉砂含量、土壤碳酸钙含量与土壤可蚀性因子之间的关系进行研究。本文运用赋值法建立了一个由2330组数据构成的数据集,绘制其特征图,并对数据做相关性分析。结果表明:1) 土壤粉砂含量与土壤可蚀性因子呈正相关,说明土壤粉砂含量越大,土壤抗侵蚀能力越差;2) 土壤粉砂含量越高,土壤可蚀性因子增长速度越快,说明土壤粉砂含量越大,土壤抗侵蚀能力下降的就越快;3) 土壤碳酸钙含量与土壤可蚀性因子成反比,说明土壤中碳酸钙含量越大,土壤抗侵蚀能力越强。通过以上结论,本文在日后的风蚀预测上给出相应的启发。
Our country is one of the countries with the largest soil erosion area in the world, so the scholars in our country have done a lot of research on soil erosion. Based on the modified wind erosion model (RWEQ), the relationship between soil silt content, soil calcium carbonate content and soil erodibility factors was studied in this paper. In this paper, a data set composed of 2330 sets of data is established by the method of assignment, and its characteristic map is drawn, and the correlation analysis of the data is made. The results showed that: 1) the content of soil silty sand was positively correlated with soil erodibility factors, indicating that the higher the content of soil silty sand, the worse the soil anti-erodibility. 2) the higher the content of soil silty sand, the faster the growth rate of soil erodibility factors, indicating that the higher the content of soil silty sand, the faster the decline of soil anti-erodibility. 3) the content of soil calcium carbonate was inversely proportional to soil erodibility factors, indicating that the higher the content of soil calcium carbonate, the stronger the soil anti-erodibility. Based on the above conclusions, this paper gives the corresponding enlightenment in the future wind erosion prediction.
[1] | 张忠扬, 吕明侠, 王一博, 等. 基于WaTEM/SEDEM模型的洮河源区土壤侵蚀产沙模拟及其空间驱动力分析[J/OL]. 水土保持研究. https://doi.org/10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.047, 2022-10-18. |
[2] | 郑粉莉, 王占礼, 杨勤科. 我国土壤侵蚀科学研究回顾和展望[J]. 自然杂志, 2008(1): 12-16+63. |
[3] | 邢丽珠, 张方敏, 邢开成, 等. 基于RWEQ模型的内蒙古巴彦淖尔市土壤风蚀变化特征及归因分析[J]. 中国沙漠, 2021, 41(5): 111-119. |
[4] | 张鹏, 尹忠东, 尚河英, 兰瑞君. 新疆卡拉贝利工程区不同地表风蚀特征[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2016, 21(9): 115-122. |
[5] | Chepil, W.S. and Woodruff, N.P. (1963) The Physics of Wind Erosion and Its Control. Advances in Agronomy, 15, 211-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60400-9 |
[6] | Woodruff, N.P. and Siddoway, F.H. (1965) A Wind Erosion Equation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 29, 602-608. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1965.03615995002900050035x |
[7] | Chepil, W.S. and Woodruff, N.P. (1954) Estimations of Wind Erodibility of Field Surfaces. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 9, Article No. 285. |
[8] | Woodruff, N.P. and Armbrust, D.V. (1968) A Monthly Climatic Factor for the Wind Erosion Equation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 23, 103-104. |
[9] | Fryrear, D.W., Bilbro, J.D., Saleh, A., et al. (2000) RWEQ: Improved Wind Erosion Technology. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 55, 183-189. |
[10] | Fryrear, D.W., Sutherland, P.L, Davis, G., Hardee, G. and Dollar, M. (1999) Wind Erosion Estimates with RWEQ and WEQ. Proceedings of Conference Sustaining the Global Farm, 10th International Soil Conservation Organization Meeting, Purdue University, West Lafayette, 24-29 May 1999 ,760-765. |
[11] | Saleh, A. and Fryrear, D.W. (1999) Soil Roughness for the Revised Wind Erosion Equation (RWEQ). Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 54, 473-476. |
[12] | 南岭, 杜灵通, 王锐. 土壤风蚀模型研究进展[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2013, 35(4): 505-509. |
[13] | 邢春燕, 郭中领, 常春平, 等. RWEQ模型在河北坝上地区的适用性[J]. 中国沙漠, 2018, 38(6): 1180-1192. |
[14] | 郭茵, 雷加强, 范敬龙, 等. 近20a蒙古国土壤风蚀变化特征及主要影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(4): 1200-1211. |
[15] | 巩国丽, 黄麟. RWEQ模型中土壤结皮和可蚀性因子的改进和应用[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018, 38(2): 271-274+280. |
[16] | 张寒冰, 高阳, 崔艳智. 基于RWEQ模型的典型沙区风蚀治理成效研究[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 55(2): 342-350. |
[17] | 巩国丽, 刘鑫, 要玲, 等. RWEQ模型中风因子的改进及应用[J]. 中国水土保持科学(中英文), 2021, 19(4): 143-148. |