全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

工业废水处理方案的绿色度模糊综合评价模型及应用
Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model and Application of the Green Degree of Industrial Wastewater Treatment Scheme

DOI: 10.12677/WPT.2023.112004, PP. 23-30

Keywords: 工业废水,处理方案,绿色度,模糊综合评价,Industrial Wastewater, Treatment Scheme, Green Degree, Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为适应工业废水处理绿色、低碳和循环的发展趋势,本文从工艺绿色先进水平、资源能源节约水平、环境影响水平和处理效果四个方面,构建了工业废水处理方案的绿色度评价指标体系和包括四个等级的模糊综合评价模型,提出了定量和定性指标的赋值和隶属度确定方法,采用层次分析法确定指标权重,利用权重作用明显、综合程度强的模糊算子进行合成运算。利用水质、水量和工艺相近的三个印染废水方案进行了应用研究,结果表明,三个方案的绿色度评价值分别为0.782、0.763和0.720,均属于中等,反映了该评价方法具有一定的可操作性、科学性和适用性,能够体现出各方案绿色度的差异化程度,并为企业提升改造废水处理的方案选用提供了依据。
In order to adapt to the development trend of green, low carbon and circulation of industrial wastewater treatment, an evaluation index system of the green degree of industrial wastewater treatment scheme and a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model including four levels have been constructed considering the green and advanced level of process, resource and energy conservation level, environmental impact level and treatment effect in this paper. The model proposes the method of assignment and membership degree determination of the indicators. The hierarchical analysis method is used to determine the index weight and the fuzzy arithmetic reflecting obvious weight effect and strong synthesis degree is used. Using three printing and dyeing wastewater schemes with similar water quality, water quantity and process, the results showed that the green evaluation values of the three schemes were 0.782, 0.763 and 0.720, respectively, all at the medium level. Case application reflects that the evaluation method has certain operability, scientificity and applicability, which can reflect the green differentiation degree of each scheme, and provides a basis for enterprises to improve the selection of the transformation of the wastewater treatment scheme.

References

[1]  赵春容, 赵万民. 模糊综合评价法在城市生态安全评价中的应用[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2010, 33(3): 179-183.
[2]  潘和平, 王翔宇. 基于绿色度的绿色建筑关键主体博弈研究[J]. 安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(1): 12-18.
[3]  陶妍艳, 徐刚, 陈雁, 等. 建筑绿色度评价与预测优化[J]. 土木工程与管理学报, 2021, 38(1): 120-126.
[4]  王乾坤, 年春光, 邓勤犁. 基于云物元理论的装配式建筑施工绿色度评价方法研究[J]. 建筑经济, 2020, 41(11): 84-90.
[5]  鲍学英, 李雨浓. 艰险山区铁路机制砂混凝土绿色度评价研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2021, 38(9): 81-86+105.
[6]  张凯峰, 尚建丽, 吴雄. 建筑材料绿色度评价方法的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2012, 26(20): 354-356.
[7]  罗福周, 王文心. 考虑产品绿色度的闭环供应链政府补贴策略研究[J]. 工业工程, 2020, 23(6): 18-27.
[8]  吴俐滢, 杨涛远, 翁顺, 等. 基于综合层次分析法的赣江特大桥安全评估[J]. 土木工程与管理学报, 2009, 39(2): 133-140.
[9]  洪锋, 王东, 万云华. 基于模糊综合评判的桩基础绿色施工指标体系研究[J]. 昆明理工大学学报(理工版), 2009, 34(4): 47-52.
[10]  邓利辉. 基于层次分析法和模糊综合评判的绿色施工评价体系研究[J]. 建筑技术开发, 2009, 36(10): 52-55.
[11]  冯峰, 许士国. 灌区水资源综合效益的改进多级模糊优选评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(7): 56-62.
[12]  郭卫, 张弘. 模糊综合评判法在绿色工艺方案决策中的应用研究[J]. 制造业自动化, 2002, 24(6): 40-43.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133