A paired basin study in the upper Santa Fe River watershed following forest thinning and prescribed burns successfully measured water budget components in a treated and an untreated (control) basin. The paired basin study was established to investigate questions that have arisen regarding changes in water yield from forest treatments. Precipitation, stream flow, soil moisture, and chloride concentrations in precipitation and stream flow were measured to quantify the water budget components. The results from eleven years of data collection and analysis have a high degree of confidence with respect to measuring the water budget components based on the mass balance of water and chloride. The differences in the geologic structure and topography between the two paired basins appeared to impact the water budgets more than the forest treatments, except during periods when winter precipitation and snowmelt represented a significant component of inflow. Although this paired basin study was not able to portray a simple relationship between forest thinning and water yield, the chloride concentration methodology used to estimate evapotranspiration (ET) was successful. These detailed observations of chloride deposition and transport characteristics may be relevant for other researchers working in forested basins with substantial ET. ET rates were estimated by examining the cycle of chloride entering and exiting each basin over six integration periods. ET was estimated to be about 90% to 94% of precipitation in the treated basin and 77% to 86% in the control basin. The higher ET in the treated basin both before and after forest treatments may be due to the much greater area of west-facing hillslopes in the treated basin, which receive warm afternoon sun, and the greater area of rock cover in the control basin. Variation in the chloride concentration of collected precipitation samples from different sites indicates that horizontal precipitation of chloride in the tree canopy is an important consideration when using the chloride mass balance approach to calculate water budget components.
References
[1]
Lewis, A.C. (2018) Monitoring Effects of Wildfire Mitigation Treatments on Water Budget Components: A Paired Basin Study in the Santa Fe Watershed, New Mexico. New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Bulletin, 163, 52 p. https://doi.org/10.58799/B-163.
[2]
Lewis, A. (2023) Santa Fe Watershed Paired Basin Data, HydroShare. http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/7a29154c0c724c6d91add3b24a127a09
[3]
Claassen, H.C. and Halm, D.R. (1996) Estimates of Evapotranspiration or Effective Moisture in Rocky Mountain Watersheds from Chloride Ion Concentrations in Stream Baseflow. Water Resources Research, 32, 363-372. https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR03111
[4]
Bauer, P.W., Ralser, S., Daniel, C. and Ilg, B. (1996) Preliminary Geologic Map of the McClure Reservoir Quadrangle, Santa Fe County, New Mexico. New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Open-file Digital Geologic Map OF-GM 7.
[5]
Mullaney, J.R., Lorenz, D.L. and Arntson, A.D. (2009) Chloride in Groundwater and Surface Water in Areas Underlain by the Glacial Aquifer System, Northern United States: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5086, 41 p. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20095086
[6]
NADP (2015) National Atmospheric Deposition Program. http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/maplib/pdf/2013/Cl_conc_2013.pdf
[7]
Chen, J., Wheater, H.S. and Lees, M.J. (2002) Identification of Processes Affecting Stream Chloride Response in the Hafren Catchment, Mid-Wales. Journal of Hydrology, 264, 12-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00049-5
[8]
Kauffman, S.J., Royer, D.L., Chang, S. and Berner, R.A. (2003) Export of Chloride after Clear-Cutting in the Hubbard Brook Sandbox Experiment. Biogeochemistry, 63, 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023335002926
[9]
Probst, A., Viville, D., Fritz, B., Ambroise, B. and Dambrine, E. (1992) Hydrochemical Budgets of a Small Forested Granitic Catchment Exposed to Acid Deposition: The Strengbach Catchment Case Study (Vosges massif, France). Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 62, 337-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00480265
[10]
Kirchner, J.E., Tetzlaff, D. and Soulsby, C. (2010) Comparing Chloride and Water Isotopes as Hydrological Tracers in Two Scottish Catchments. Hydrological Processes, 24, 1631-1645. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7676
[11]
Page, T., Beven, K.J., Freer, J. and Neal, C. (2006) Modelling the Chloride Signal at Plynlimon, Wales, Using a Modified Dynamic TOPMODEL Incorporating Conservative Chemical Mixing (with Uncertainty). Hydrological Processes, 21, 292-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6186
[12]
Herckes, P., Mirabel, P. and Wortham, H. (2002) Cloud Water Deposition at High-Elevation Sites in the Vosges Mountains (France). The Science of the Total Environment, 296, 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00037-2
[13]
Kalina, M.F., Stopper, S., Zambo, E., et al. (2002) Altitude-Dependent Wet, Dry and Occult Nitrogen Deposition in an Alpine Region. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 9, 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987473
