This article is the culmination of the research and
practical work of the network of academics and industries which has been set up
worldwide since 2013 to help banks and the credit risk counterparty business
sectors through action research and appropriate publications in Corporate
Accounting FinTech to cross the threshold of OPE25 effective January 1, 2023.
The OPE 25 standard—Calculation of RWA for operational risk indeed underpins
the accounting and financial management strategy of Banks and Counterparties
Credit Risk or CCR (insurance companies, industries, and services, including
local authorities). The forward management paradigm serving as the basis for
insuring bank credit and raising funds on the stock market has changed.
Forecasting future sales based on past sales data is no longer enough: To be
realistic, the mathematical or quantitative approach (statistics and
probabilities) for estimating the forecast turnover and future cash flows, in
particular the calculation of the growth rate, must now be linked to the use of
historical data (at least 5 years) and the future financial performance plan
(over at least 3 years), to the corporate accounting process taking into
account the total paid workforce, due to the predominant effect of HR, to
mitigate losses generating economic capital accounts and the SOX ratio
impacting both the cost price of products and services sold and the
competitiveness of the entity and securing investments. This is the requirement
of the “General criteria on loss data identification, collection and
treatment”, (BCBS, 2017a) which is
now incorporated into the Consolidated Basel III Framework, for OPE25, https://www.bis.org/basel_framework/).
References
[1]
BCBS (2010). Basel III: A Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking Systems. https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs189_dec2010.htm
[2]
BCBS (2017a). The Basel Framework. https://www.bis.org/basel_framework
BCBS (2020). Guide for Supervisors Integrating Climate-Related and Environmental Risks into Prudential Supervision. https://www.ngfs.net/sites/default/files/medias/documents/ngfs_guide_for_supervisors.pdf
[5]
BCBS (2021a). Progress Report on Adoption of the Basel Regulatory Framework. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d525.htm
BCBS, (2019). Overview of Pillar 2 Supervisory Review Practices and Approaches. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d465.htm
[9]
EUR-LEX. (2017). European Directive (EU) 2017/828 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 Amending Directive 2007/36/EC as Regards the Encouragement of Long-Term Shareholder Engagement (“Shareholder Rights II”). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017L0828
[10]
European Directive Article 9a, of the May 17, 2017. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017L0828&rid=5
[11]
Financial Stability Board (2017). Financial Stability Implications from FinTech. https://www.fsb.org/2017/06/financial-stability-implications-from-fintech
[12]
Grima, S., Klein, R. W., Zhao, R., Bezzina, F., & Lélé, P. (2016). Strengthening Valueand Risk Culture Using a Real-Time Logical Tool. ISACA Journal, 3. https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-3/strengthening-value-and-risk-culture-using-a-real-time-logical-tool#14
[13]
Koeplin, J. P., & Lélé, P. (2023). Loss Control Case Reports to OPE25 on FinTech for SOX Ratio to Consider for Solvency and Insurance Underwriting. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcaf.22617
[14]
SEC (2018). Non-GAAP Financial Measures of April 4, 2018. https://www.sec.gov/corpfin/non-gaap-financial-measures