全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

OPE25’s Sector Case Report—RWA Calculation for Operational Risk: Corporate Accounting FinTech Cash Surplus (Economic Capital Accounts and SOX Ratio)

DOI: 10.4236/jfrm.2023.122008, PP. 137-165

Keywords: Loss Control, SOX Ratio, Incentivized Pay, FinTech SAF, Human Capital, Corporate Accounting, Historical Data, Economic Capital Accounts, Profitability Ratios

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This article is the culmination of the research and practical work of the network of academics and industries which has been set up worldwide since 2013 to help banks and the credit risk counterparty business sectors through action research and appropriate publications in Corporate Accounting FinTech to cross the threshold of OPE25 effective January 1, 2023. The OPE 25 standard—Calculation of RWA for operational risk indeed underpins the accounting and financial management strategy of Banks and Counterparties Credit Risk or CCR (insurance companies, industries, and services, including local authorities). The forward management paradigm serving as the basis for insuring bank credit and raising funds on the stock market has changed. Forecasting future sales based on past sales data is no longer enough: To be realistic, the mathematical or quantitative approach (statistics and probabilities) for estimating the forecast turnover and future cash flows, in particular the calculation of the growth rate, must now be linked to the use of historical data (at least 5 years) and the future financial performance plan (over at least 3 years), to the corporate accounting process taking into account the total paid workforce, due to the predominant effect of HR, to mitigate losses generating economic capital accounts and the SOX ratio impacting both the cost price of products and services sold and the competitiveness of the entity and securing investments. This is the requirement of the “General criteria on loss data identification, collection and treatment”, (BCBS, 2017a) which is now incorporated into the Consolidated Basel III Framework, for OPE25,
https://www.bis.org/basel_framework/).

References

[1]  BCBS (2010). Basel III: A Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking Systems.
https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs189_dec2010.htm
[2]  BCBS (2017a). The Basel Framework.
https://www.bis.org/basel_framework
[3]  BCBS (2017b). Basel III: Finalising Post-Crisis Reforms.
https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d424.htm
[4]  BCBS (2020). Guide for Supervisors Integrating Climate-Related and Environmental Risks into Prudential Supervision.
https://www.ngfs.net/sites/default/files/medias/documents/ngfs_guide_for_supervisors.pdf
[5]  BCBS (2021a). Progress Report on Adoption of the Basel Regulatory Framework.
https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d525.htm
[6]  BCBS (2021b).
https://www.bis.org/press/p211109.htm
[7]  BCBS (2021c).
https://www.hcm-accounting.com
[8]  BCBS, (2019). Overview of Pillar 2 Supervisory Review Practices and Approaches.
https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d465.htm
[9]  EUR-LEX. (2017). European Directive (EU) 2017/828 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 Amending Directive 2007/36/EC as Regards the Encouragement of Long-Term Shareholder Engagement (“Shareholder Rights II”).
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017L0828
[10]  European Directive Article 9a, of the May 17, 2017.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017L0828&rid=5
[11]  Financial Stability Board (2017). Financial Stability Implications from FinTech.
https://www.fsb.org/2017/06/financial-stability-implications-from-fintech
[12]  Grima, S., Klein, R. W., Zhao, R., Bezzina, F., & Lélé, P. (2016). Strengthening Valueand Risk Culture Using a Real-Time Logical Tool. ISACA Journal, 3.
https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-3/strengthening-value-and-risk-culture-using-a-real-time-logical-tool#14
[13]  Koeplin, J. P., & Lélé, P. (2023). Loss Control Case Reports to OPE25 on FinTech for SOX Ratio to Consider for Solvency and Insurance Underwriting. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcaf.22617
[14]  SEC (2018). Non-GAAP Financial Measures of April 4, 2018.
https://www.sec.gov/corpfin/non-gaap-financial-measures

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133