全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Numerical Study on Low-Reynolds Compressible Flows around Mars Helicopter Rotor Blade Airfoil

DOI: 10.4236/jfcmv.2023.112003, PP. 30-48

Keywords: CFD, CLF5605 Rotor Blade Airfoil, Compressibility Effect, Low-Reynolds Number, Mars Helicopter, Separation Bubble, Shock Wave

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

High-speed rotor rotation under the low-density condition creates a special low-Reynolds compressible flow around the rotor blade airfoil where the compressibility effect on the laminar separated shear layer occurs. However, the compressibility effect and shock wave generation associated with the increase in the Mach number (M) and the trend change due to their interference have not been clarified. The purpose is to clear the compressibility effect and its impact of shock wave generation on the flow field and aerodynamics. Therefore, we perform a two-dimensional unsteady calculation by Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis using the CLF5605 airfoil used in the Mars helicopter Ingenuity, which succeeded in its first flight on Mars. The calculation conditions are set to the Reynolds number (Re) at 75% rotor span in hovering (Re = 15,400), and the Mach number was varied from incompressible (M = 0.2) to transonic (M = 1.2). The compressible fluid dynamics solver FaSTAR developed by the Japan aerospace exploration agency (JAXA) is used, and calculations are performed under multiple conditions in which the Mach number and angle of attack (α) are swept. The results show that a flow field is similar to that in the Earth’s atmosphere above M = 1.0, such as bow shock at the leading edge, whereas multiple λ-type shock waves are observed over the separated shear layer above α = 3° at M = 0.80. However, no significant difference is found in the Cp distribution around the airfoil between M = 0.6 and M = 0.8. From the results, it is found that multiple λ-type shock waves have no significant effect on the airfoil surface pressure distribution, the separated shear layer effect is dominant in the surface pressure change and aerodynamic characteristics.

References

[1]  Datta, A., et al. (2003) Design of a Martian Autonomous Rotary-Wing Vehicle. Journal of Aircraft, 40, 461-472.
https://doi.org/10.2514/2.3141
[2]  Sugiura, M., et al. (2020) Aerodynamic Optimal Design of Mars Helicopter Rotor Blade Planform. Proceedings of the FDC/ANSS, city, 28-30 September 2020, 157-164.
[3]  Sato, M., et al. (2021) Mach Number Effects on Rotor Performance of Martian Helicopter “HAMILTON”. Proceedings of the FDC/ANSS, 30 June - 2 July 2021.
[4]  Northon, K. (2021) NASA’s Ingenuity Mars Helicopter Succeeds in Historic First Flight.
https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-s-ingenuity-mars-helicopter-succeeds-in-historic-first-flight
[5]  Koning, W.J.F., Johnson, W. and Allan, B.G. (2018) Generation of Mars Helicopter Rotor Model for Comprehensive Analyses. Proceedings of the AHS International Technical Meeting on Aeromechanics Design for Transformative Vertical Flight, San Francisco, 16-18 January 2018.
[6]  Koning, W.J.F., Johnson, W. and Grip, H.F. (2019) Improved Mars Helicopter Aerodynamic Rotor Model for Comprehensive Analyses. AIAA Journal, 57, 3969-3979.
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J058045
[7]  Canuto, D. and Taira, K. (2015) Two-Dimensional Compressible Viscous Flow around a Circular Cylinder. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 785, 349-371.
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.635
[8]  Takaki, R. (2006) Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA4402 in Low Reynolds Number Flows. Journal of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 54, 367-373.
https://doi.org/10.2322/jjsass.54.367
[9]  Suwa, T., Nose, K., Numata, D., Nagai, H. and Asai, K. (2012) Compressibility Effects on Airfoil Aerodynamics at Low Reynolds Number. 30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2012, New Orleans, 25-28 June 2012, 1571-1583.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-3029
[10]  Munday, P. M., Taira, K., Suwa, T., Numata, D. and Asai, K. (2015) Nonlinear Lift on a Triangular Airfoil in Low-Reynolds-Number Compressible Flow. Journal of Aircraft, 52, 924-931.
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C032983
[11]  Anyoji, M., Numata, D., Nagai, H. and Asai, K. (2015) Effects of Mach Number and Specific Heat Ratio on Low-Reynolds-Number Airfoil Flows. AIAA Journal, 53, 1640-1654.
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053468
[12]  Mukohara, H. and Anyoji, M. (2022) Computational Analysis of Compressibility Effect on Flow Field and Aerodynamics at Low Reynolds Numbers. Physics of Fluids, 34, Article ID: 056109.
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0079186
[13]  Drela, M. (1992) Transonic Low-Reynolds Number Airfoils. Journal of Aircraft, 29, 1106-1113.
https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46292
[14]  McMasters, J.H. and Henderson, M.L. (1979) Low-Speed Single-Element Airfoil Synthesis. Technical Soaring, 6, 1-31.
[15]  Anyoji, M., et al. (2011) Development of a Low-Density Wind Tunnel for Simulating Martian Atmospheric Flight. Transactions of the JSASS Aerospace Technology Japan, 9, 21-27.
https://doi.org/10.2322/tastj.9.21
[16]  Hashimoto, A., et al. (2015) Development of Fast Unstructured-Grid Flow Solver FaSTAR. Journal of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 63, 96-105.
https://doi.org/10.2322/jjsass.63.96
[17]  Kitamura, K. and Shima, E. (2010) Improvements of Simple Low-Dissipation AUSM against Shock Instabilities in Consideration of Interfacial Speed of Sound. Proceedings of the ECCOMAS CFD 2010, Lisbon, 14-17 June 2010, Paper No. 1283.
[18]  Winslow, J., Otsuka, H., Govindarajan, B. and Chopra, I. (2017) Basic Understanding of Airfoil Characteristics at Low Reynolds Numbers (104-105). Journal of Aircraft, 55, 1050-1061.
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034415
[19]  Radespiel, R.E., Windte, J. and Scholz, U. (2007) Numerical and Experimental Flow Analysis of Moving Airfoils with Laminar Separation Bubbles. AIAA Journal, 45, 1346-1356.
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.25913
[20]  Coder, J.G. and Maughmer, M.D. (2014) Computational Fluid Dynamics Compatible Transition Modeling Using an Amplification Factor Transport Equation. AIAA Journal, 52, 2506-2512.
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052905
[21]  Menter, F.R. (1992) Improved Two-Equation k-omega Turbulence Models for Aerodynamic Flows. NASA TM 103975.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1993-2906
[22]  Langtry, R.B. and Menter, F.R. (2009) Correlation-Based Transition Modeling for Unstructured Parallelized Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes. AIAA Journal, 47, 2894-2906.
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.42362
[23]  Menshov, O.S. and Nakamura, Y. (1995) Implementation of the LU-SGS Method for an Arbitrary Finite Volume Discretization. Proceedings of the 9th Japan Conference on CFD, Tokyo, 20-22 December 1995, 123-124.
[24]  Shima, E., Kitamura, K. and Haga, T. (2013) Green-Gauss/Weighted-Least-Squares Hybrid Gradient Reconstruction for Arbitrary Polyhedra Unstructured Grids. AIAA Journal, 51, 2740-2747.
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052095
[25]  Roe, P.L. (1986) Characteristic-Based Schemes for the Euler Equations. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 18, 337-365.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.18.010186.002005
[26]  Taniguchi, S., et al. (2020) Experimental and RANS Analysis of Full Mars Airplane Configurations. AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, Orlando, 6-10 January 2020, 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-2224
[27]  Jacobs, E.N. (1936) Methods Employed in America for the Experimental Investigation of Aerodynamic Phenomena at High Speeds. Volta Meeting Paper, 42.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133