全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

南药牛大力标准汤剂质量差异性分析
Quality Difference Analysis of Standard Decoction of Millettia speciosa Champ

DOI: 10.12677/HJMCe.2023.112012, PP. 93-99

Keywords: 牛大力,标准汤剂,刺桐碱
Millettia speciosa Champ
, Standard Decoction, Hypaphorine

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:建立牛大力标准汤剂质量评价方法,比较不同产地牛大力标准汤剂的差异性。方法:制备12批不同产地牛大力标准汤剂,测定出膏率,建立牛大力标准汤剂HPLC指纹图谱及对指标性成分刺桐碱含量测定,并结合化学计量学方法对12批牛大力标准汤剂差异性进行分析。结果:建立了牛大力标准汤剂指纹图谱,确定了5个共有峰,指认了一个共有峰。主成分分析(PCA)将样品分为4类,正交偏最小二乘法判别分析(OPLS-DA)找出了两个差异性化合物,分别为峰3、峰5 (刺桐碱)。不同产地刺桐碱含量测定平均值分别为:3.175 mg/g、11.572 mg/g、1.586 mg/g、3.873 mg/g。本文所建立的牛大力标准汤剂质量评价方法科学有效,可用于牛大力的质量控制和评价。
Objective: To establish an analysis method of the quality evaluation method and investigate the quality differences of Millettia speciosa Champ (MSC) standard decoctions from different habitats. Methods: Twelve batches of MSC standard decoction were prepared. The extract rates, the yield of Hypaphorine were determined. Chromatographic fingerprints of MSC standard decoctions were generated from HPLC and the quality differences were analyzed using the method of chemometrics and statistics. Conclusion: The fingerprints of the MSC standard decoctions were established a total of 5 common peaks were determined respectively, and one peak was identified. MSC standard decoctions sample was dividedinto four groups by PCA, then two marker compounds were selected and identified by OPLS-DA, including peaks-3, peaks-5 (Hypaphorine). The average content of Hypaphorine from different habitats was 3.175 mg/g, 11.572 mg/g, 1.586 mg/g, 3.873 mg/g. A scientific and effective evaluation method of MSC standard decoction was established, which also provided a reference for the identification and quality control of MSC.

References

[1]  河北省食品药品监管管理局. 河北省中药饮片炮制规范(2003年版) [M]. 河北: 学苑出版社, 2004: 26.
[2]  何克谏. 生草药性备要[M]. 广州: 广东科技出版社, 1717: 26-58.
[3]  广东省食品药品监督管理局. 广东省中药材标准(第一册) [M]. 广州: 广东科技出版社, 2004: 40-41.
[4]  韦玉燕, 巫繁菁, 曾海生, 等. 牛大力研究概况[J]. 广西科学院学报, 2010, 26(3): 380-382.
[5]  孙福仁, 张睿智, 李菲, 等. 柴胡标准汤剂两种成分测定方法研究[J]. 中医药导报, 2020, 26(12): 24-27.
[6]  陈士林. 标准汤剂——提升中药配方颗粒质量的重要桥梁[N]. 中医药导报, 2021-03-09(003).
[7]  侯倩煜, 贾愉波, 王德立, 等. 固相萃取超高效液相色谱测定牛大力中4个黄酮的含量[J]. 药物分析杂志, 2022, 42(11): 1909-1916.
[8]  戴蒙, 潘超美, 彭泽通, 等. 牛大力两种根的生药学研究[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2021, 32(1): 100-102.
[9]  苏志恒, 郑华, 宋慧, 等. 牛大力HPLC指纹图谱的研究[J]. 现代食品, 2020(17): 205-209.
[10]  宋驰, 葛威, 邹佳莉, 等. 北柴胡及醋北柴胡标准汤剂质量差异性分析[J]. 中草药, 2022, 53(8): 2331-2340.
[11]  胡增美, 黄露, 侯佳华, 等. 中药中生物碱类化学成分的毒性作用研究进展[J]. 中南药学, 2022, 20(3): 633-641.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413