Recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) is a complex and heterogeneous disorder with multiple etiologies. Genetic factors are thought to play an important role in the etiology of RSA. With recent advances in genetic testing technologies, there has been an increasing interest in using these tools to diagnose the etiology of RSA. This review discusses the different types of genetic testing methods, such as karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis, next-generation sequencing, and their applications in the diagnosis of the etiology RSA. The use of genetic testing in the diagnosis of RSA has the potential to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and the understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the disorder, which could lead to better management and treatment of affected individuals.
References
[1]
Hooker, A., Lemmers, M., Thurkow, A., et al. (2014) Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Intrauterine Adhesions after Miscarriage: Prevalence, Risk Factors and Long-Term Reproductive Outcome. Human Reproduction Update, 20, 262-278. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt045
[2]
The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2012) Evaluation and Treatment of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Committee Opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 98, 1103-1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.048
[3]
Bender, A.R., Christiansen, O., Elson, J., et al. (2018) ESHRE Guideline: Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Human Reproduction Open, 2018, hoy004. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoy004
[4]
Youssef, A., Vermeulen, N., Lashley, E., Goddijn, M. and van der Hoorn, M.L.P. (2019) Comparison and Appraisal of (inter)national Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Guidelines. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 39, 497-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.04.008
[5]
Van Dijk, M., Kolte, A., Limpens, J., Kirk, E., Quenby, S., van Wely, M. and Goddijn, M. (2020) Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Diagnostic Workup after Two or Three Pregnancy Losses? A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis. Human Reproduction Update, 26, 356-367. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmz048
[6]
Bagkou Dimakou, D., Tamblyn, J., Justin, C., Coomarasamy, A. and Richter, A. (2022) Diagnosis and Management of Idiopathic Recurrent Pregnancy Loss (RPL): Current Immune Testing and Immunomodulatory Treatment Practice in the United Kingdom. Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 153, Article ID: 103662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2022.103662
[7]
Zhu, X., Li, Zhu, J., Y., Wang, W., Wu, X., Yang, Y., Gu, L., Gu, Y. and Hu, Y. (2018) Application of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Products of Miscarriage. Molecular Cytogenetics, 11, Article No. 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-018-0396-y
[8]
Howe, B., Umrigar, A. and Tsien F. (2014) Chromosome Preparation from Cultured Cells. Journal of Visualized Experiments, No. 83, e50203. https://doi.org/10.3791/50203
[9]
Popescu, F., Jaslow, C. and Kutteh, W. (2018) Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Evaluation Combined with 24-Chromosome Microarray of Miscarriage Tissue Provides a Probable or Definite Cause of Pregnancy Loss in over 90% of Patients. Human Reproduction, 33, 579-587. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey021
[10]
Park, S., Min, J., Kang, J., et al. (2022) Chromosomal Abnormalities of 19,000 Couples with Recurrent Spontaneous Abortions: A Multicenter Study. Fertility and sterility, 117, 1015-1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.011
[11]
Li, S., Chen, M. and Zheng, P. (2021) Analysis of Parental Abnormal Chromosomal Karyotype and Subsequent Live Births in Chinese Couples with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Scientific Reports, 11, Article No. 20298. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98606-4
[12]
Tunç, E., Tanrıverdi, N., Demirhan, O., et al. (2016) Chromosomal Analyses of 1510 Couples Who Have Experienced Recurrent Spontaneous Abortions. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 32, 414-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.01.006
[13]
Verdoni, A., Hu, J., Surti, U., et al. (2021) Reproductive Outcomes in Individuals with Chromosomal Reciprocal Translocations. Genetics in Medicine, 23, 1753-1760. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01195-w
[14]
Cai, M., Lin, N., Xu, L., et al. (2021) Comparative Clinical Genetic Testing in Spontaneous Miscarriage: Insights from a Study in Southern Chinese Women. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 25, 5721-5728. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.16588
[15]
Kowalczyk, K., Smyk, M., Bartnik-Głaska, M., et al. (2022) Application of Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) for Identification of Chromosomal Aberrations in the Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 39, 357-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02400-8
[16]
Liu, P., Carvalho, C.M., Hastings, P.J. and Lupski, J.R. (2012) Mechanisms for Recurrent and Complex Human Genomic Rearrangements. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, 22, 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2012.02.012
[17]
Li, S., Chen, L., Wang, X., et al. (2021) Chromosomal Variants Accumulate in Genomes of the Spontaneous Aborted Fetuses Revealed by Chromosomal Microarray Analysis. PLOS ONE, 16, e0259518. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259518
[18]
Franco-Jarava, C., Valenzuela, I., Riviere, J.G., et al. (2022) Common Variable Immunodeficiency and Neurodevelopmental Delay Due to a 13Mb Deletion on Chromosome 4 Including the NFKB1 Gene: A Case Report. Frontiers in Immunology, 13, Article 897975. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.897975
[19]
Shah, M.S., Cinnioglu, C., Maisenbacher, M., et al. (2017) Comparison of Cytogenetics and Molecular Karyotyping for Chromosome Testing of Miscarriage Specimens. Fertility and Sterility, 107, 1028-1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.022
[20]
Tan, E.S., Knepper, T.C., Wang, X., et al. (2022) Copy Number Alterations as Novel Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Colorectal Cancer. Cancers, 14, Article 2223. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14092223
[21]
Najafi, K., Mehrjoo, Z., Ardalani, F., et al. (2021) Identifying the Causes of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss in Consanguineous Couples Using Whole exome Sequencing on the Products of Miscarriage with No Chromosomal Abnormalities. Scientific Reports, 11, Article No. 6952. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86309-9
[22]
Zhou, Q., Wu, S.Y., Amato, K., DiAdamo, A. and Li, P. (2016) Spectrum of Cytogenomic Abnormalities Revealed by Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization on Products of Conception Culture Failure and Normal Karyotype Samples. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 43, 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2016.02.002
[23]
Cooper, G.M., Zerr, T., Kidd, J.M., Eichler, E.E. and Nickerson, D.A. (2008) Systematic Assessment of Copy Number Variant Detection via Genome-Wide SNP Genotyping. Nature Genetics, 40, 1199-1203. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.236
[24]
Miller, D.T., Adam, M.P., Aradhya, S., et al. (2010) Consensus Statement: Chromosomal Microarray Is a First-Tier Clinical Diagnostic Test for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities or Congenital Anomalies. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 86, 749-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006
[25]
Wang, Y., Li, Y., Chen, Y., et al. (2020) Systematic Analysis of Copy-Number Variations Associated with Early Pregnancy Loss. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 55, 96-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20412
[26]
Riggs, E.R., Andersen, E.F., Cherry, A.M., et al. (2020) Technical Standards for the Interpretation and Reporting of Constitutional Copy-Number Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Genetics in Medicine, 22, 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-019-0686-8
[27]
Chen, L., Wang, L., Tang, F., et al. (2021) Copy number Variation Sequencing Combined with Quantitative Fluorescence Polymerase Chain Reaction in Clinical Application of Pregnancy Loss. The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 38, 2397-2404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02243-9
[28]
Sheng, Y.R., Hou, S.Y., Hu, W.T., et al. (2021) Characterization of Copy-Number Variations and Possible Candidate Genes in Recurrent Pregnancy Losses. Genes, 12, Article 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12020141
[29]
Zhang, X., Huang, Q., Yu, Z. and Wu, H. (2021) Copy Number Variation Characterization and Possible Candidate Genes in Miscarriage and Stillbirth by Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis. Journal of Gene Medicine, 23, e3383. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgm.3383
[30]
Liu, S., Song, L., Cram, D.S., et al. (2015) Traditional Karyotyping vs Copy Number Variation Sequencing for Detection of Chromosomal Abnormalities Associated with Spontaneous Miscarriage. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 46, 472-477. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14849
[31]
Wang, J., Chen, L., Zhou, C., et al. (2018) Prospective Chromosome Analysis of 3429 Amniocentesis Samples in China Using Copy Number Variation Sequencing. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 219, e1-287. e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.030
[32]
Chen, Y., Bartanus, J., Liang, D., et al. (2017) Characterization of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Pregnancy Losses Reveals Critical Genes and Loci for Human Early Development. Human Mutation, 38, 669-677. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.23207
[33]
Zhao, C., Chai, H., Zhou, Q., et al. (2021) Exome Sequencing Analysis on Products of Conception: A Cohort Study to Evaluate Clinical Utility and Genetic Etiology for Pregnancy Loss. Genetics in Medicine, 23, 435-442. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-01008-6
[34]
Demetriou, C., Chanudet, E., Joseph, A., et al. (2019) Exome Sequencing Identifies Variants in FKBP4 that Are Associated with Recurrent Fetal Loss in Humans. Human Molecular Genetics, 28, 3466-3474. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddz203
[35]
Yang, M., Sun, H., Liu, Y. and Hu, T. (2022) Whole Exome Sequencing Revealed a Heterozygous Elongation Factor Tu GTP-Binding Domain Containing 2 (EFTUD2) Mutation in a Couple Experiencing Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Chinese Medical Journal, 135, 1108-1110. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001667
[36]
Petrovski, S., Aggarwal, V., Giordano, J.L., et al. (2019) Whole-Exome Sequencing in the Evaluation of Fetal Structural Anomalies: A Prospective Cohort Study. The Lancet, 393, 758-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32042-7
[37]
Al Qahtani, N.H., Abdulazeez, S., Almandil, N.B., et al. (2021) Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Exonic Variation of ASIC5 Gene Results in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Frontiers in Medicine, 8, Article 699672. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.699672
[38]
Slimani, W., Jelloul, A., Al-Rikabi, A., Sallem, A., Hasni, Y., Chachia, S., Ernez, A., Chaieb, A., Bibi, M., Liehr, T., Saad, A. and Mougou-Zerelli, S. (2020) Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosomes (sSMC) and Male Infertility: Characterization of Five New Cases, Review of the Literature, and Perspectives. The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 37, 1729-1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01811-9
[39]
Cheng, Z., Cheng, D., Li, J., et al. (2021) Polymorphisms within DNA Double-Strand Breaks Repair-Related Genes Contribute to Structural Chromosome Abnormality in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Frontiers in Genetics, 12, Article 787718. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.787718
[40]
Wang, Y., Zhou, R., Jiang, L., Meng, L., Tan, J., Qiao, F., Wang, Y., Zhang, C., Cheng, Q., Jiang, Z., Hu, P. and Xu, Z. (2021) Identification of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Early Pregnancy Loss Using a High-Throughput Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification-Based Assay. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 23, 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.10.002
[41]
Li, F.X., Xie, M.J., Qu, S.F., et al. (2020) Detection of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Spontaneous Miscarriage by Low-Coverage Next-Generation Sequencing. Molecular Medicine Reports, 22, 1269-1276. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11208
