全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Second-Order MaxEnt Predictive Modelling Methodology. III: Illustrative Application to a Reactor Physics Benchmark

DOI: 10.4236/ajcm.2023.132015, PP. 295-322

Keywords: Second-Order Predictive Modeling, OECD/NEA Reactor Physics Benchmark, Data Assimilation, Best-Estimate Results, Uncertainty Quantification, Reduced Predicted Uncertainties

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This work illustrates the innovative results obtained by applying the recently developed the 2nd-order predictive modeling methodology called “2nd- BERRU-PM”, where the acronym BERRU denotes “best-estimate results with reduced uncertainties” and “PM” denotes “predictive modeling.” The physical system selected for this illustrative application is a polyethylene-reflected plutonium (acronym: PERP) OECD/NEA reactor physics benchmark. This benchmark is modeled using the neutron transport Boltzmann equation (involving 21,976 uncertain parameters), the solution of which is representative of “large-scale computations.” The results obtained in this work confirm the fact that the 2nd-BERRU-PM methodology predicts best-estimate results that fall in between the corresponding computed and measured values, while reducing the predicted standard deviations of the predicted results to values smaller than either the experimentally measured or the computed values of the respective standard deviations. The obtained results also indicate that 2nd-order response sensitivities must always be included to quantify the need for including (or not) the 3rd- and/or 4th-order sensitivities. When the parameters are known with high precision, the contributions of the higher-order sensitivities diminish with increasing order, so that the inclusion of the 1st- and 2nd-order sensitivities may suffice for obtaining accurate predicted best- estimate response values and best-estimate standard deviations. On the other hand, when the parameters’ standard deviations are sufficiently large to approach (or be outside of) the radius of convergence of the multivariate Taylor-series which represents the response in the phase-space of model parameters, the contributions stemming from the 3rd- and even 4th-order sensitivities are necessary to ensure consistency between the computed and measured response. In such cases, the use of only the 1st-order sensitivities erroneously indicates that the computed results are inconsistent with the respective measured response. Ongoing research aims at extending the 2nd-BERRU-PM methodology to fourth-order, thus enabling the computation of third-order response

References

[1]  Cacuci, D.G. (2023) Second-Order MaxEnt Predictive Modeling Methodology. I: Deterministically Incorporated Computational Model Responses (2nd-BERRU-PMD). American Journal of Computational Mathematics.
[2]  Cacuci, D.G. (2023) Second-Order MaxEnt Predictive Modelling Methodology. II: Probabilistically Incorporated Computational Model (2nd-BERRU-PMP). American Journal of Computational Mathematics.
[3]  Jaynes, E.T. (1957) Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics. Physical Review Journals Archive, 106, 620-630.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.106.620
[4]  Shannon, C.E. (1948) A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
[5]  Lewis, J.M., Lakshmivarahan, S. and Dhall, S.K. (2006) Dynamic Data Assimilation: A Least Square Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511526480
[6]  Valentine, T.E. (2006) Polyethylene-Reflected Plutonium Metal Sphere Subcritical Noise Measurements, SUB-PU-METMIXED-001. International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments, NEA/NSC/DOC(95)03/I-IX, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris.
[7]  Alcouffe, R.E., Baker, R.S., Dahl, J.A., Turner, S.A. and Ward, R. (2008) PARTISN: A Time-Dependent, Parallel Neutral Particle Transport Code System. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos.
[8]  Wilson, W.B., Perry, R.T., Shores, E.F., Charlton, W.S., Parish, T.A., Estes, G.P., Brown, T.H., Arthur, E.D., Bozoian, M., England, T.R., et al. (2002) SOURCES 4C: A Code for Calculating (α, n), Spontaneous Fission, and Delayed Neutron Sources and Spectra. Proceedings of the American Nuclear Society/Radiation Protection and Shielding Division 12th Biennial Topical Meeting, Santa Fe, 14-18 April 2002.
[9]  Conlin, J.L., Parsons, D.K., Gardiner, S.J., Beth Lee, M.G.M. and White, M.C. (2013) MENDF71X: Multigroup Neutron Cross-Section Data Tables Based upon ENDF/B-VII.1X. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-UR-5-29571, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos.
[10]  Cacuci, D.G. and Fang, R. (2023) The nth-Order Comprehensive Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology, Volume II: Overcoming the Curse of Dimensionality: Large-Scale Application. Springer, Cham.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19635-5
[11]  Fang, R. and Cacuci, D.G. (2022) Fourth-Order Adjoint Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of an OECD/NEA Reactor Physics Benchmark: II. Computed Response Uncertainties. Journal of Nuclear Engineering, 3, 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jne3010001
[12]  Cacuci, D.G. and Fang, R. (2021) Fourth-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis of an OECD/NEA Reactor Physics Benchmark: I. Mathematical Expressions and CPU-Time Comparisons for Computing 1st-, 2nd-and 3rd-Order Sensitivities. American Journal of Computational Mathematics, 11, 94-132.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcm.2021.112009
[13]  Cacuci, D.G. and Fang, R. (2021) Fourth-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis of an OECD/NEA Reactor Physics Benchmark: II. Mathematical Expressions and CPU-Time Comparisons for Computing 4th-Order Sensitivities. American Journal of Computational Mathematics, 11, 133-156.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcm.2021.112010

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413