全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

复合微生态制剂对盘锦稻蟹种养田水质和细菌群落的影响
Effects of Composite Microecological Preparations on Water Quality and Bacterial Community in Rice Crab Cultivation Fields of Panjin Rice

DOI: 10.12677/AMS.2023.102013, PP. 118-129

Keywords: 微生态制剂,稻蟹共生,水质,细菌群落
Microecological Preparations
, Rice-Crab Symbiosis, Water Quality, Bacterial Community

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本研究建立一种新的生态调控模式,通过在有河蟹的稻田围隔内加入含有乳酸菌,反硝化细菌、芽孢杆菌为主的复合微生态制剂,探讨微生态制剂对养殖水体中溶解氧,pH,氨态氮、亚硝酸氮和活性磷以及河蟹生长和水稻产量的影响。通过研究得出以下结论:在稻蟹种养田水体内添加微生态制剂可以显著影响水质,与对照组进行比较,试验组的pH、溶解氧、氨态氮、亚硝酸氮和活性磷有显著性差异(P < 0.05)。其中溶解氧降低14%,氨态氮升高53%,亚硝酸氮升高50%,活性磷升高20%。但氨态氮,亚硝酸氮和活性磷相对含量都很低,同时也为水体带来了N和P等营养物质。水体细菌群落没有显著变化,优势门为变形菌门、拟杆菌门、放线菌门、厚壁菌门。优势属分别为Limnohabitans、Hydrogenophaga、多核杆菌属、黄杆菌属,Curvibacter。水稻千粒重增加9.14%,扣蟹质量增加11.87%,且均没有病害发生。因此,在稻蟹种养田中应用微生态制剂对水质有显著影响,水体细菌群落基本保持稳定,水稻和扣蟹产量上升,有较好的经济增加产出。
In this study, a new eco-logical regulation model was established, and the effects of microecological preparations on dis-solved oxygen, pH, ammonia nitrogen, nitrite nitrogen and active phosphorus, as well as Eriocheir sinensis growth and rice yield were explored by adding compound microecological preparations mainly containing lactic acid bacteria, denitrifying bacteria and bacillus in paddy fields with Eri-ocheir sinensis. Through the study, it was concluded that the addition of microecological prepara-tions to the water body of rice crab cultivation field could significantly affect the water quality, and compared with the control group, there were significant differences in pH, dissolved oxygen, ammo-nia nitrogen, nitrite nitrogen and active phosphorus in the experimental group (P < 0.05). Among them, dissolved oxygen decreased by 14%, ammonia nitrogen increased by 53%, nitrite nitrogen increased by 50%, and active phosphorus increased by 20%. However, ammonia nitrogen, nitrite nitrogen and active phosphorus are relatively low in content, and they also bring nutrients such as N and P to the water body. There was no significant change in the bacterial community of the water body, and the dominant phylum were Proteobacteria, Bacteroides, Actinomycetes, and Firmicutes. The dominant genera are Limnohabitans, Hydrogenophaga, Polynucleobacteria, Flavobacteria, and Curvibacter. The weight of 1,000 grains of rice increased by 9.14%, and the mass of buckle crab in-creased by 11.87%, and no diseases occurred. Therefore, the application of microecological prepa-rations in rice crab breeding fields had a significant impact on water quality, the bacterial commu-nity of the water body remained basically stable, the yield of rice and juvenile crabs increased, and there was a good economic increase in output.

References

[1]  刘元生, 孟庆红, 何腾兵, 罗海波, 钱晓刚. 稻田生态养鱼水质动态与水稻生长及经济效益研究[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2003(5): 5-6, 20.
[2]  吕东锋, 王武, 马旭洲, 白国福, 陈再忠, 于永清. 稻田生态养蟹的水质变化与水稻生长关系的研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2010(4): 233-235.
https://doi.org/10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2010.04.150
[3]  刘忆瀚, 蔺凌云, 尹文林, 潘晓艺, 姚嘉赟, 徐洋, 沈锦玉. 微生态制剂对凡纳滨对虾生长?酶活及养殖水质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(15): 96-101, 104.
[4]  李雪. 微生态菌对养渔水体水质及微生物群落结构的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 沈阳: 辽宁大学, 2019.
[5]  吴保承, 沈国强, 杨春霞, 张栋. 微生态制剂在水质净化中的应用现状及展望[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2010(S2): 408-410.
[6]  Gao, J., Wang, R., Liu, J.X., Wang, W.L., Chen, Y. and Cai, W.T. (2022) Effects of Novel Microecologics Combined with Traditional Chinese Medicine and Probiotics on Growth Performance and Health of Broilers. Poultry Science, 101, Article ID: 101412.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101412
[7]  Guo, H., Yu, L.L., Tian, F.W., Zhao, J.X., Zhang, H., Chen, W. and Zhai, Q.X. (2021) Effects of Bacteroides-Based Microecologics against Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea in Mice. Micro-organisms, 9, Article 2492.
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9122492
[8]  Lukwambe, B., Qiuqian, L.L., Wu, J.F., Zhang, D.M., Wang, K. and Zheng, Z.M. (2015) The Effects of Commercial Microbial Agents (probiotics) on Phytoplankton Community Structure in Intensive White Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) Aquaculture Ponds. Aquaculture International, 23, 1443-1455.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-015-9895-6
[9]  盖建军, 矫新明, 陈焕根. 4种微生态制剂对养殖水质的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2013(10): 255-256.
[10]  王笃彩, 闫斌伦, 李士虎. 3种微生态制剂对养殖水体水质影响的比较研究[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2011, 32(1): 66-70.
https://doi.org/10.15928/j.1674-3075.2011.01.009
[11]  Ludwig, W. (2007) Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics and Identification. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 120, 225-236.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.06.023
[12]  Miao, J., Yin, Z., Yang, Y., et al. (2022) Investigation of the Microbial Community Structure and Diversity in the Environment Surrounding a Veterinary Antibiotic Production Factory. RSC Advances, 12, 1021-1027.
https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA08119E
[13]  李思明, 丁惠君, 郭小泽, 符辉, 唐艳强, 钟家友. 复方中草药对中华绒螯蟹生长、非特异性免疫和抗病力的影响[J]. 水产科学, 2015(4): 201-207.
https://doi.org/10.16378/j.cnki.1003-1111.2015.04.001
[14]  阎斌伦, 王兴强, 李士虎, 王笃彩, 戴岩, 时冬晴, 徐加涛, 徐国成, 罗刚. 微生物制剂在中华绒螯蟹工厂化育苗水质调控中的应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(3): 329-332.
[15]  Singh, U.B., Deepti, M., Wasiullah, Singh, S., Pradhan, J.K., Singh, B.P., Roy, M., Imram, M., Pathak, N., Baisyal, B.M., Rai, J.P., Sarma, B.K., Singh, R.K., Sharma, P.K., Kaur, S.D., Manna, M.C., Sharma, S.K. and Sharma, A.K. (2016) Bio-Protective Microbial Agents from Rhizosphere Eco-Systems Trigger Plant Defense Responses Provide Protection against Sheath Blight DISEASE in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Microbiological Research, 192, 300-312.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2016.08.007
[16]  曾洪学, 屈兴红, 刘晓宇. 有益微生物制剂EM-2生物液肥对水稻生长的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2021, 27(2): 88-89.
https://doi.org/10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2021.02.032
[17]  李文博. 稻田综合种养对水稻产量和品质的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2021.
[18]  王昂. 稻蟹共作系统氮素迁移与转化特征的研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 上海海洋大学, 2018.
[19]  谷加坤. EM制剂对河蟹池塘生态养殖水体中菌群变化的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.27244/d.cnki.gnjnu.2020.001395
[20]  乔振民, 韩迎亚, 刘有华, 王倩楠, 安贤惠, 李联泰. 6种微生态制剂对鲤鱼养殖水体水质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(12): 159-162.
https://doi.org/10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2020.12.034
[21]  周鑫军. 水产养殖水质改良常用微生物制剂之芽孢杆菌篇[J]. 当代水产, 2015, 40(10): 93.
[22]  李南充. 微生态制剂在池塘养殖中的应用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 咸阳: 西北农林科技大学, 2013.
[23]  张云杰. 稻蟹共生对稻田水质影响的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海海洋大学, 2013.
[24]  蔡姝文. 微生物制剂在水产养殖中的作用[J]. 现代农业科技, 2014(18): 251, 270.
[25]  申祺, 李蔚然, 于小彭, 王康健, 展广军, 贺双梅, 于艳青. 稻蟹共作对稻田生物影响的研究进展[J]. 北方水稻, 2021, 51(5): 59-62.
[26]  李嘉尧, 常东, 李柏年, 吴旭干, 朱泽闻, 成永旭. 不同稻田综合种养模式的成本效益分析[J]. 水产学报, 2014, 38(9): 1431-1438.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133