全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

California Bearing Ratio for Cohesive Soils from Quasi Static Cone Tests

DOI: 10.4236/ojce.2023.132028, PP. 367-387

Keywords: California Bearing Ratio, Quasi Static Consistency Limits, Plastic Limit, Liquid Limit, Plasticity Index

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The California bearing ratio (CBR) test is the most widely spread method of determining the bearing strength of the pavement material and is fundamental to pavement design practice in most countries. This test is expensive, laborious and time consuming, and to overcome this, Quasi static cone penetrometer machine was fabricated and used to measure the consistency limits (liquid limit-LL, Plastic limit-PL and Plasticity index-PI), which were used to develop an empirical equation to determine CBR. Soil samples were collected and unsoaked CBR, PL, LL and PI were determined according to BS 1377 part 9 and BS 1377-2; 1990. Quasi static penetration forces at 20 mm depth of penetration were also determined at consistency limits. It was found that the force of 1020 gf and 60 gf was achieved at a depth of 20 mm at PI and LL respectively. The correlation and regression analysis between consistency limits, and the experimental CBR obtained showed coefficient of determination, R2 = 0.907 between CBR and all the parameters using multiple linear regression analysis (MLRA). The regression equation developed was used together with the relationship developed between the Quasi static Penetration force at consistency limits and the tested consistency limits to come up with the General Empirical Equation. Verification of the formula showed that the correlation can be used accurately to determine the un soaked CBR.

References

[1]  Katte, V.Y., Mfoyet, S.M., Manefouet, B., Wouatong, A.S.L. and Bezeng, L.A. (2018) Correlation of California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Value with Soil Properties of Road Subgrade Soil. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 37.
[2]  Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development (2018) National Budget Frame Work Paper Financial Year 2019/20-Financial Year 2023/2024. Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development.
[3]  Teh, K.T., HASSIM, S., Muniandy, R., Omar, H. and Hassan, A. (2005) The Development of Road Construction Material Selection System (RC-mss). Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 1313-1328.
[4]  BSI: Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes, Part 2 (BS 1377-2). British Standards Institution, London, 1990.
[5]  Casagrande, A. (1958) Notes on the Design of the Liquid Limit Device. Géotechnique, 8, 84-91.
https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1958.8.2.84
[6]  Nugroho, S.A., Yusa, M. andSatibi, S. (2016) Value Estimation of California Bearing Ratio from Hand Cone Penetrometer Test for Pekanbaru Soils. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 26, 25-32.
[7]  Zumrawi, M.M.E. (2014) Prediction of In-Situ CBR of Subgrade Cohesive Soils from Dynamic Cone Penetrometer and Soil Properties. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6, 439-442.
https://doi.org/10.7763/IJET.2014.V6.738
[8]  Hrubesova, E., Lunackova, B. and Brodzki, O. (2016) Comparison of Liquid Limit of Soils Resulted from Casagrande Test and Modificated Cone Penetrometer Methodology. Procedia Engineering, 365, 364-370.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.02.063
[9]  Hovayni, P. (1958) A New Grooving Tool. Géotechnique, 8, 79.
[10]  Stone, K.J.L. and Kyambadde, B.S. (2007) The Determination of Strength and Index Properties of Fine Grained Soils Using a Soil Minipenetrometer. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 133, 667-673.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:6(667)
[11]  Stone, K.J.L. and Phan, K.D. (1995) Cone Penetration Test near the Plastic Limit. Géotechnique, 45, 155-158.
https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1995.45.1.155
[12]  Muhwezi, L., Acai, J. and Otim, G. (2014) An Assessment of the Factors Causing Delays on Building Construction Projects in Uganda. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 3, 13-23.
[13]  Ahmed Nawal Ahsan, (2014) Pavement Performance Monitoring Using Dynamic Cone Penetrometer and Geogauge during Construction. Master’s Thesis, The University of Texas, Arlington, 8-11.
[14]  Gebremariam G. Feleke and Alemgena A. Araya, (2016) Prediction of CBR Using DCP for Local Subgrade Materials. Proceedings of the 2016 International Transport and Road Research Conference (iTRARR), Kenya, 16-18 March 2016.
[15]  Sven Hansbo, (1957) A New Approach for Determination of Shear Strength of Clay by Fall-Cone Test. 19. Royal Swedish Geo Technical Institute Proceedings No.14. p. 19.
[16]  Iqbal, F., Kumar, A. and Murtaza, A. (2018) Co-Retationship between California Bearing Ratio and Index Properties of Jamshoro Soils. Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering & Technology, 3, 185-190.
https://doi.org/10.22581/muet1982.1801.16

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133