全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

宜章县耕地质量等级与土壤养分特征分析
Characteristics of Cultivated Land Quality Grade and Soil Nutrients in Yizhang County

DOI: 10.12677/HJSS.2022.113014, PP. 107-115

Keywords: 耕地质量,肥力现状,评价,高产耕地,中低产耕地,土壤改良
Cultivated Land Quality
, Fertility Status, Evaluation, High-Yield Cultivated Land, Middle-Low Yield Cultivated Land, Soil Improvement

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

弄清宜章县耕地土壤肥力现状及其质量特征,为挖掘耕地生产潜力和保障粮食安全提供依据。本研究基于第三次全国国土调查,采用耕地土壤调查、土壤采集、分析测定、数学模型等方法,研究了宜章县耕地土壤有机质、pH、有效磷与速效钾等肥力特征,并按照《耕地质量等级》(GB/T 33469-2016)的技术路线进行了耕地质量评价。结果表明宜章县耕地土壤肥力处于中等水平,土壤有机质均值为36.7 g/kg,有效磷均值为20.6 mg/kg,速效钾均值为118 mg/kg,pH均值为6.29。耕地质量加权平均等级为4.91,高产耕地(一至三等地)面积9198.88 hm2,占耕地面积的31.16%;中产耕地(四级至六级级)面积为12,867.98 hm2,占耕地总面积的43.58%,低产耕地(七级至十级)面积为7461.26 hm2,占耕地总面积的25.26%。基于宜章县耕地质量等级与土壤肥力特征,应采取科学施肥、改善排水灌溉状况、治理耕地土壤酸化、保育高产耕地与提升及改良中低产耕地的手段,以提升耕地质量并提高粮食生产能力。
To clarify the present situation and quality characteristics of cultivated land soil fertility in Yizhang County, so as to provide the basis for exploring the potential of cultivated land production and en-suring food security. Based on the third national land resource survey, this study studied the fertil-ity characteristics of cultivated soil organic matter, pH, available phosphorus and available potas-sium in Yizhang County by using the methods of soil survey, soil collection, analysis and measure-ment, and mathematical model. The cultivated land quality was evaluated according to the tech-nical route of “Cultivated land quality grade” (GB/T 33469-2016). The results showed that the soil fertility of cultivated land in Yizhou County was in the medium level, with the mean of organic mat-ter being 36.7 g/kg, available phosphorus 20.6 mg/kg, available potassium 118 mg/kg and pH 6.29. The weighted average grade of cultivated land quality was 4.91. The area of high-yield cultivated land (Grade 1 to 3) was 9198.88 hm2, accounting for 31.16% of the cultivated land area. The area of middle class cultivated land (Grade 4 to 6) is 12867.98 hm2, accounting for 43.58% of the total area of cultivated land, and the area of low yield cultivated land (Grade 7 to 10) is 7461.26 hm2, ac-counting for 25.26% of the total area of cultivated land. Based on the quality grade of cultivated land and the characteristics of soil fertility in Yizhang County, scientific fertilization, improvement of drainage and irrigation, control of soil acidification of cultivated land, conservation of high-yield cultivated land, promotion and improvement of middle-low yield cultivated land should be adopted to improve the quality of cultivated land and grain production capacity.

References

[1]  陈百明, 周小萍. 中国近期耕地资源与粮食综合生产能力的变化态势[J]. 资源科学, 2004, 26(5): 38-45.
[2]  姜广辉, 赵婷婷, 段增强, 等. 北京山区耕地质量变化及未来趋势模拟[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(10): 304-311.
[3]  张晋科, 张风荣, 张琳, 等. 中国耕地的粮食生产能力与粮食产量对比研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(11): 2278-2285.
[4]  付国珍, 摆万奇. 耕地质量评价研究进展及发展趋势[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(2): 226-236.
[5]  Ye, S.J., Zhu, D.H., Yao, X.C., et al. (2014) Development of a Highly Flexible Mobile GIS-Based Sys-tem for Collecting Arable Land Quality Data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7, 4432-4441.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2320635
[6]  聂艳, 周勇, 于婧, 等. 基于GIS和模糊物元贴近度聚类分析模型的耕地质量评价[J]. 土壤学报, 2005, 42(4): 551-558.
[7]  张敏. 耕地质量评价方法研究概述[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2020, 31(21): 10-12.
[8]  李卓倩, 赵贤妤, 张莉坤, 等. 基于LESA综合评价模型的耕地质量定级方法[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(4): 363-367, 375.
[9]  唐宗, 周悟, 杨颢, 等. 基于交互效应Logistic回归模型的耕地质量评价方法研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(12): 2394-2403.
[10]  汪甜甜, 费坤, 江文娟, 等. 宣州区耕地质量等级评价及灌排能力对耕地质量影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2021, 40(11): 79-89.
[11]  潘雪, 蔡立群, 董博, 乜光昀. 平川区耕地质量等级及养分特征分析研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(29): 118-128.
[12]  江文娟, 汤萌萌, 汪甜甜, 等. 宣城市耕地质量等级及土壤养分空间分布特征[J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(1): 36-44.
[13]  杨满元, 杨宁. 衡阳紫色土丘陵坡地5种土地利用方式土壤肥力综合评价[J]. 湖南生态科学学报, 2021, 8(2): 10-16.
[14]  杨佳, 于志军, 王参, 等. 雄安新区不同土地利用方式土壤性状的空间分布特征——以容城县为例[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(17): 6764-6772.
[15]  Liu, R.M., Xu, F., Yu, W.W., et al. (2016) Analysis of Field-Scalespatial Correlations and Variations of Soil Nutrients Using Geostatistics. Environmental Moni-toring & Assessment, 188, Article No. 126.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5130-9
[16]  张欣, 李梦佳, 刘洪斌, 等. 丘陵区耕地土壤剖面有机质含量分布特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(12): 2696-2708.
[17]  杨帆, 徐洋, 崔勇, 等. 近30年中国农田耕层土壤有机质含量变化[J]. 土壤学报, 2017, 54(5): 1047-1056.
[18]  向娇, 宋超, 石迎春, 等. 安徽省六安地区土壤pH空间变异特征及其影响因素[J]. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(1): 34-41.
[19]  展晓莹, 任意, 张淑香, 等. 中国主要土壤有效磷演变及其与磷平衡的响应关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(23): 4728-4737.
[20]  柳开楼, 韩天富, 黄晶, 等. 中国稻作区土壤速效钾和钾肥偏生产力时空变化[J]. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(1): 202-212.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413