全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Associations between Sow Body Condition with Subsequent Reproductive Performance

DOI: 10.4236/ojas.2023.133023, PP. 310-322

Keywords: Backfat, Body Condition, Reproduction, Sow, Sow Caliper

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The objective was to quantify relationships between sow body condition and subsequent reproduction. Multiparous sows were measured at breeding (n = 1571) and farrowing (n = 887) on a commercial farm in eastern North Carolina. Sow body condition measures included: sow body condition caliper (CS), weight (BW), backfat, longissimus muscle area (LMA) and visual body condition score (BCS). Sow production traits were: number born alive (NBA), litter birth weight (LBW), number weaned (NW), piglet survival (PS), litter weaning weight (LWW), wean-to-conception interval (WCI), farrowing rate and lactation average daily feed intake. Data were analyzed in SAS using PROC GLM for continuous traits and PROC GLIMMIX for categorical traits. Breeding CS had a curvilinear relationship (P < 0.05) with NBA, LBW, NW, PS and WCI, with a CS of 15 being optimal for NBA, NW and PS and 14 ideal for LBW and WCI. Breeding LMA had a curvilinear relationship (P < 0.05) with PS, with 51.5 cm2 maximizing survival. Breeding BCS had a curvilinear relationship (P

References

[1]  Young, M.G., Tokach, M.D., Aherne, F.X., Main, R.G., Dritz, S.S., Goodband, R.D. and Nelssen, J.L. (2004) Comparison of Three Methods of Feeding Sows in Gestation and the Subsequent Effects on Lactation Performance. Journal of Animal Science, 82, 3058-3070.
https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.82103058x
[2]  Fitzgerald, R.F., Stalder, K.J., Dixon, P.M., Johnson, A.K., Karriker, L.A. and Jones, G.F. (2009) The Accuracy and Repeatability of Sow Body Condition Scoring. Applied Animal Science, 25, 415-425.
https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30736-1
[3]  O’Connell, M.K., Lynch, P.B., Bertholot, S., Verlait, F. and Lawlor, P.G. (2007) Measuring Changes in Physical Size and Predicting Weight of Sows during Gestation. Animal, 1, 1335-1343.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731107000559
[4]  Knauer, M.T. and Baitinger, D.J. (2015) The Sow Body Condition Caliper. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 31, 175-178.
https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.31.10632
[5]  Neary, M. and Yager, A. (2002) Body Condition Scoring in Farm Animals. Purdue Extension Service. Purdue University AS-550-W.
https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/as/as-550-w.pdf
[6]  NRC (2012) Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 11th Edition, The National Academies Press, Washington DC.
[7]  Rosero, D., Arellano, C., van Heugten, E., Johnston, M.E. and Boyd, R.D. (2013) Development of a Prediction Equation to Estimate Post-Partum Sow Body Weight from Pre-Partum Weight. The Journal of Animal Science, 91, 46.
[8]  Bryan, M.R., Kendall, D.C., Baitinger, D. and Knauer, M.T. (2013) Relationships between Body Condition and Subsequent Reproductive Performance for Sows Housed in Individual Pens. The Journal of Animal Science, 91, 68.
[9]  Li, Y., Cui, S., Baidoo, S.K. and Johnston, L.J. (2021) Evaluation of Sow Caliper for Body Condition Measurements of Gestating Sows. Journal of Swine Health and Production, 29, 245-252.
[10]  Authement, M.R. and Knauer, M.T. (2023) Associations between Sow Body Lesions with Body Condition and Subsequent Reproductive Performance. Veterinary Medicine-Open Journal, 13, 111-121.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojvm.2023.137010
[11]  Huerta, I., Fernandez, P., Vier, C.M., Aguero, C., Lu, N., Blanco, P., Sala, R., Cast, W.R. and Orlando, U.A. (2021) 146 Association between Gilts and Sows Body Condition and Reproductive Performance. Journal of Animal Science, 99, 134.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab054.226
[12]  Clowes, E.J., Aherne, F.X., Foxcroft, G.R. and Baracos, V.E. (2003) Selective Protein loss in Lactating Sows Is Associated with Reduced Litter Growth and Ovarian Function. Journal of Animal Science, 81, 753-764.
https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.813753x
[13]  Wülbers-Mindermann, M., Algers, B., Berg, C., Lundeheim, N. and Sigvardsson, J. (2002) Primiparous and Multiparous Maternal Ability in Sows in Relation to Indoor and Outdoor Farrowing Systems. Livestock Production Science, 73, 285-297.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00257-3
[14]  Morello, G.M. (2015) Investigating Piglet Crushing by the Sow: A Data Mining Approach. Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette.
[15]  Lavery, A., Lawlor, P.G., Magowan, E., Miller, H.M., O’Driscoll, K. and Berry, D.P. (2019) An Association Analysis of Sow Parity, Live-Weight and Back-Fat Depth as Indicators of Sow Productivity. Animal, 13, 622-630.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118001799
[16]  Knauer, M., and Yeich, P. (2020) Does Farrowing Crate Size Impact Piglet Survival? National Hog Farmer.
https://www.nationalhogfarmer.com/animal-health/does-farrowing-crate-size-impact-piglet-survival
[17]  Vargovic, L., Athorn, R.Z., Hermesch, S. and Bunter, K.L. (2022) Improving Sow Welfare and Outcomes in the Farrowing House by Identifying Early Indicators from Pre-Farrowing Assessment. Journal of Animal Science, 100, skac294.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skac294
[18]  Yang, H., Eastham, P.R., Phillips, P. and Whittemore, C.T. (1989) Reproductive Performance, Body Weight and Body Condition of Breeding Sows with Differing Body Fatness at Parturition, Differing Nutrition during Lactation and Differing Litter Size. Animal Production, 48, 181-201.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100003901
[19]  Young, M.G. and Aherne, F.X. (2005) Monitoring and Maintaining Sow Condition. Advanced Pork Production, 16, 299-313.
[20]  Schenkel, A.C., Bernardi, M.L., Bortolozzo, F.P. and Wentz, I. (2010) Body Reserve Mobilization during Lactation in First Parity Sows and Its Effect on Second Litter Size. Livestock Science, 132, 165-172.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.06.002
[21]  Maes, D.G.D., Janssens, G.P.J., Delputte, P., Lammertyn, A. and de Kruif, A. (2004) Back Fat Measurements in Sows from Three Commercial Pig Herds: Relationship with Reproductive Efficiency and Correlation with Visual Body Condition Scores. Livestock Production Science, 91, 57-67.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.06.015
[22]  Dourmad, J.Y. (1991) Effect of Feeding Level in the Gilt during Pregnancy on Voluntary Feed Intake during Lactation and Changes in Body Composition during Gestation and Lactation. Livestock Production Science, 27, 309-319.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(91)90126-B
[23]  Kirkwood, R.N., Baidoo, S.K., Aherne, F.X. and Sather, A.P. (1987) The Influence of Feeding Level during Lactation on the Occurrence and Endocrinology of the Postweaning Estrus in Sows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 67, 405-415.
https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas87-039
[24]  Muro, B.B.D., Carnevale, R.F., Leal, D.F., Almond, G.W., Monteiro, M.S., Poor, A.P., Schinckel, A.P. and Garbossa, C.A.P. (2022) The Importance of Optimal Body Condition to Maximise Reproductive Health and Perinatal Outcomes in Pigs. Nutrition Research Reviews, 1-21.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422422000129
[25]  Koketsu, Y., Dial, G.D., Pettigrew, J.E. and King, V.L. (1996) Feed Intake Pattern during Lactation and Subsequent Reproductive Performance of Sows. Journal of Animal Science, 74, 2875-2884.
https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.74122875x
[26]  Thaker, M.Y.C. and Bilkei, G. (2005) Lactation Weight Loss Influences Subsequent Reproductive Performance of Sows. Animal Reproduction Science, 88, 309-318.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.10.001

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133