全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

设计评论中“皇帝的新装”现象探究
Research on the Phenomenon of “The Emperor’s New Clothes” in Design Comments

DOI: 10.12677/ARL.2023.123029, PP. 167-172

Keywords: 认知偏差,从众心理,晕轮效应,马太效应
Cognitive Bias
, Conformity, Halo Effect, The Matthew Effect

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

通常人们在评论设计大师的作品时往往只谈优点,不论缺点,导致无法客观全面地认识和分析某些作品。本文从心理学角度出发,通过分析从众心理的主客观两个角度、晕轮效应以及马太效应的成因,探讨这些心理效应所引起的个体与群体的认知偏差并给出相应解决方法。个体需要正确认识这些心理效应对认知的影响,培养独立思考的能力并学会运用批判性思维。
Generally, when commenting on the works of design masters, people only talk about the advantages, regardless of the disadvantages, resulting in the inability to objectively and comprehensively understand and analyze the products. The article analyzes it from the psychological angle, explores the subjective and objective perspectives of conformity, the causes of halo effect and the Matthew effect, discusses the cognitive bias between individuals and groups, and gives the relevant solutions. Individuals need to correctly understand these psychological effects, cultivate the ability of independent thinking and learn to use critical thinking.

References

[1]  申继豪. 浅析市场营销中“晕轮效应”的影响和应用[J]. 中国商论, 2016(19): 9-10.
[2]  晕轮效应的心理研究[J]. 大众科学, 2013(1): 42-43.
[3]  韩尚锋, 李玥, 刘燊, 徐强, 谭群, 张林. 美在观察者眼中: 陌生面孔吸引力评价中的晕轮效应与泛化效应[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(4): 363-376.
[4]  岳越. 浅析“晕轮效应”在商业广告的影响及应用[J]. 商场现代化, 2017(5): 46-47.
https://doi.org/10.14013/j.cnki.scxdh.2017.05.024
[5]  罗伯特?西奥迪尼. 影响力[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2006.
[6]  陈志霞. 社会心理学[M]. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2016.
[7]  Macdonald, C.T. and Wood, J.K. (2019) The Moderating Effect of Need for Affiliation on Conformity in Response to Group Reactions. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 47, 28-37.
[8]  戴维?巴斯. 进化心理学[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2015.
[9]  古斯塔夫?勒庞. 乌合之众: 大众心理研究[M]. 北京: 中央编译出版社, 2017.
[10]  李颖. 从众心理对大学生道德社会化的影响[J]. 教育评论, 2004(3): 26-29.
[11]  Bilali, M., Mcleod, P. and Gobet, F. (2008) Why Good Thoughts Block Better Ones: The Mechanism of the Pernicious Einstellung (Set) Effect. Cognition, 108, 652-661.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.005
[12]  王崇德. 马太效应的定量表述[J]. 情报资料工作, 1997(4): 3-5.
[13]  Michael, S. (2017) Systems of Evaluation and the Matthew Effect. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27, 362-364.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617737704
[14]  石成奎. 大学生从众心理成因及其对策[J]. 学校党建与思想教育, 2006(12): 51-52.
[15]  Wen, W., Li, J., Georgiou, G.K., Huang, C. and Lu Wang (2020) Reducing the Halo Effect by Stimulating Analytic Thinking. Social Psychology, 51, 334-340.
https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000418
[16]  李昊, 王登峰. 批判性思维与晕轮效应: 完美主义的作用[C]//中国心理学会. 第二十一届全国心理学学术会议摘要集. 2018: 166-167.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413