Afforestation has been observed as a green trend in urban areas. The
incorporation of trees in urban infrastructure is highly recommended to act as
a solution to outlined environmental problems such as global warming. However,
it has been precipitously introduced in cities, towns, and metropolitans. The
introduction of the green practice was so abrupt that it became devoid to
meeting the essential needs for tree growth, thus, failing to bring out the desired effects.
Inappropriately selecting and planting trees in urban spaces has resulted in
stressed trees that are deficient at reaching up to the calculated goals and in
the long run end up being problematic. The main objective of this study is to
evaluate the implications of planting southern live oak (Quercus virginiana) trees in the wrong urban space so as to aid in
recommending sustainable green solutions for the urban community. By studying
southern live oaks planted in Howell Community Park and three randomly selected
areas in Southern University Baton Rouge Campus, this study analyzes how the
selection of these tree species in the urban spaces influenced their growth and
general well-being. These urban spaces were randomly drafted based on
accessibility and availability of several southern live oaks. Planting approaches
in the four study areas were explored and the general health condition of the
trees was determined using the tree appraisal method presented by the i-tree
model: my tree. ArcGIS collector was used to collect the GPS coordinates of the
trees and ArcMap was used to generate the maps of the study areas. ArcMap
software geolocated the coordinates of the southern live oaks in all the
four-study areas.The software was used to generate shapefiles of the
four study areas and their location in East Baton Rouge. The analysis of the
results proved that none of the southern live oaks had an excellent health
condition and most of the trees experienced different issues due to planting
them in the wrong urban spaces.
References
[1]
Alliance for Community Trees (2011). Benefits of Trees and Urban Forests: A Research List (19 p.). Unpublished White Paper. http://www.actrees.org/files/Research/benefits_of_trees.pdf
[2]
Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L., Knight, T. M., & Pullin, A. S. (2010). Urban Greening to Cool Towns and Cities: A Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97, 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
[3]
Churkina, G., Grote, R., Butler, T. M., & Lawrence, M. G. (2015). Natural Selection? Picking the Right Trees for Urban Greening. Environmental Science and Policy, 47, 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.014
[4]
Coder, K. D. (2010). Live Oak: Historic Ecological Structures. University of Georgia.
[5]
Hasan, R., Othman, N., & Ismail, F. (2016). Roadside Tree Management in Selected Local Authorities for Public Safety. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 234, 218-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.237
[6]
Hasan, R., Othman, N., & Ismail, F. (2017). Tree Species Selection in Street Planting: It’s Relationship with Issues in Urban Area. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 2, 185-194. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v2i6.951
[7]
Hassan, M., & Elhassan, S. (2020). Modelling of Urban Growth and Planning: A Critical Review. Journal of Building Construction and Planning Research, 8, 245-262. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbcpr.2020.84016
[8]
Lord, C. P., Strauss, E., & Toffler, A. (2003). Natural Cities: Urban Ecology and the Restoration of Urban Ecosystems. Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 21, 317-385.
[9]
McHale, M. R., McPherson, E. G., & Burke, I. C. (2007). The Potential of Urban Tree Plantings to Be Cost Effective in Carbon Credit Markets. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6, 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.01.001
[10]
McPherson, E. G., & Peper, P. J. (1995). Infrastructure Repair Costs Associated with Street Trees in 15 Cities. In G. W. Watson, & D. Neely (Eds.), Trees and Building Sites (pp. 49-63). International Society of Arboriculture.
[11]
McPherson, E. G., & Simpson, J. R. (2003). Potential Energy Savings in Buildings by an Urban Tree Planting Programme in California. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2, 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1078/1618-8667-00025
[12]
Nowak, D. J., & Dwyer, J. F. (2007). Understanding the Benefits and Costs of Urban Forest Ecosystems. In J. E. Kuser (Ed.), Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast (pp. 25-46). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4289-8_2
[13]
Önder, S., & Akay, A. (2014). The Roles of Plants on Mitigating the Urban Heat Islands’ Negative Effects. International Journal of Agriculture and Economic Development, 2, 18-32.
[14]
Peper, P. J., McPherson, E. G., Simpson, J. R., Albers, S. N., & Xiao, Q. (2010). Central Florida Community Tree Guide: Benefits, Costs, and Strategic Planting (118 p.). Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR 230, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. https://doi.org/10.2737/PSW-GTR-230
[15]
Qi, Y., Favorite, J., Chin, K., & Xiao, Y. (2006). Physiological, Anatomical, and Ecological Characteristics of Southern Live Oak. USDA Forest Service-General Technical Report SRS-92.
[16]
Safford, H., Larry, E., McPherson, E. G., Nowak, D. J., & Westphal, L. M. (2013). Urban Forests and Climate Change. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Climate Change Resource Center. https://www.fs.usda.gov/ccrc/topics/urban-forests
[17]
The United States Census Bureau (2023). Quickfacts: East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/eastbatonrougeparishlouisiana/SBO020217
