In this paper, an inequality satisfied by the vacuum energy density of the universe is derived using an indirect and heuristic procedure. The derivation is based on a proposed thought experiment, according to which an electron is accelerated to a constant and relativistic speed at a distance L from a perfectly conducting plane. The charge of the electron is represented by a spherical charge distribution located within the Compton wavelength of the electron. Subsequently, the electron is incident on the perfect conductor giving rise to transition radiation. The energy associated with the transition radiation depends on the parameter L. It is shown that an inequality satisfied by the vacuum energy density will emerge when the length L is pushed to cosmological dimensions and the product of the radiated energy and the time duration of emission are constrained by Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. The inequality derived is given by ρΛ ≤ 9.9×10-9J/m3where ρΛ is the vacuum energy density. This result is consistent with the measured value of the vacuum energy density, which is 0.538 × 10-9J/m. Since there is a direct relationship between the vacuum energy density and the Einstein’s cosmological constant, the inequality can be converted directly to that of the cosmological constant.
References
[1]
Adler, R.J., Casey, B. and Jacob, O.C. (1995) Vacuum Catastrophe: An Elementary Exposition of the Cosmological Constant Problem. American Journal of Physics, 63, 620-626. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17850
[2]
Bengochea, G.R., León, G., Okon, E. and Sudarsky, D. (2020) Can the Quantum Vacuum Fluctuations Really Solve the Cosmological Constant Problem? The European Physical Journal C, 80, Article No. 18.
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7554-1
[3]
Jackson, J.D. (1975) Classical Electrodynamics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
[4]
Cooray, V. and Cooray, G. (2016) On the Remarkable Features of the Lower Limits of Charge and the Radiated Energy of Antennas as Predicted by Classical Electrodynamics. Atmosphere, 7, Article No. 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos7050064
[5]
Cooray, V. and Cooray, G. (2016) On the Action of the Radiation Fields Generated by Traveling-Wave Element and Its Connection to the Time Energy Uncertainty Principle, Elementary Charge and the Fine Structure Constant. Atmosphere, 8, Article No. 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8030046
[6]
Cooray, V. and Cooray, G. (2017) A Universal Condition Satisfied by the Action of Electromagnetic Radiation Fields. Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications, 9, 167-182. https://doi.org/10.4236/jemaa.2017.911015
[7]
Cooray, V. and Cooray, G. (2018) Remarkable Predictions of Classical Electrodynamics on Elementary Charge and the Energy Density of Vacuum. Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications, 10, 77-87.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jemaa.2018.105006
[8]
Cooray, V. and Cooray, G. (2019) Novel Features of Classical Electrodynamics and Their Connection to the Elementary Charge, Energy Density of Vacuum and Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle—Review and Consolidation. Journal of Modern Physics, 10, 74-90. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2019.101007
[9]
Cooray, V., Cooray, G., Rubinstein, M. and Rachidi, F. (2023) Hints of the Quantum Nature of the Universe in Classical Electrodynamics and Their Connection to the Electronic Charge and Dark Energy. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.07972
[10]
Cooray, V., Cooray, G., Rubinstein, M. and Rachidi, F. (2023) Hints of the Quantum Nature of the Electromagnetic Fields in Classical Electrodynamics. Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications, 15, 25-42.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jemaa.2023.153003
[11]
Cooray, V. and Cooray, G. (2017) Classical Electromagnetic Fields of Moving Charges as a Vehicle to Probe the Connection between the Elementary Charge and Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle. Natural Science, 9, 219-230.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2017.97022
[12]
Compton, A.H. (2019) The Size and Shape of the Electron. Physical Review, 14, 247.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.14.247
[13]
Carter, H.W. and Wong, C.-Y. (2014) On the Question of the Point-Particle Nature of the Electron. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1406.7268
[14]
Friedmann, A. (1999) On the Possibility of a World with Constant Negative Curvature of Space. General Relativity and Gravitation, 31, 2001-2008.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026755309811
[15]
De Sitter, W. (1917) On the Relativity of Inertia: Remarks Concerning Einstein’s Latest Hypothesis. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 19, 1217-1225.
[16]
Weinberg, S. (2008) Cosmology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[17]
Riess, A.G., et al. (1998) Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant. The Astronomical Journal, 116, 1009-1038. https://doi.org/10.1086/300499
[18]
Perlmutter, S., et al. (1999) Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae. The Astronomical Journal, 517, 565-586.
[19]
Planck Collaboration (2016) Planck 2015 Results. XIII. Cosmological Parameters. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 594, A13.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629543
[20]
Sidharth, B.G. (2009) Dark Energy and Electrons. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 48, 2122-2128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-009-9989-x
