To further improve the insurance legal system, this paper takes the “Belt
and Road” as the background to research the legal system of overseas investment
insurance. It elaborates the theoretical cornerstone of the legal system of
overseas investment insurance from the aspects that overseas investment
insurance is created “in the name of the state” and conforms to the
characteristics of the participation of diversified subjects under the global
governance; the construction of the legal system of overseas investment
insurance under the Belt and Road Initiative The construction of the legal
system for overseas investment insurance under the “Belt and Road” initiative
should follow the principles of economic sovereignty and fairness and mutual
benefit; in order to improve the legal system for insurance, it proposes
measures in three aspects, namely, setting the main legislative objectives of the
legal system for overseas investment insurance, establishing the status of
equal protection for overseas investment equities and claims, and standardizing
the supervision and management of the insurance industry for overseas
investment, so as to help realize win-win situation for both the overseas
investment and the host country.
References
[1]
Berge, T. L. (2021) Asymmetric Diffusion: World Bank ‘Best Practice’ and the Spread of Arbitration in National Investment Laws. Review of International Political Economy, 28, 584-610. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1719429
[2]
Chen, Q. (2021) Green Finance and Outward Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment of Green Insurance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39, 899-924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09750-w
[3]
Cookson, R. (2021) The Inverse Care Law Re-Examined: A Global Perspective. The Lancet, 397, 828-838. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00243-9
[4]
Dafe, F. (2021) Banking on Courts: Financialization and the Rise of Third-Party Funding in Investment Arbitration. Review of International Political Economy, 28, 1362-1384.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1764378
[5]
Demirel, H. C. (2022) Mechanisms for Protecting Returns on Private Investments in Public Infrastructure Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 40, 155-166.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.11.008
[6]
Jiang, W. (2021) Political Risk Analysis of Foreign Direct Investment into the Energy Sector of Developing Countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 302, 127023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127023
[7]
Minović, J. (2021) The Relationship between Foreign Direct Investment and Institutional Quality in Western Balkan Countries. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 23, 40-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2020.1818038
[8]
Ren, S. (2022) How Does Green Investment Affect Environmental Pollution? Evidence from China. Environmental and Resource Economics, 81, 25-51.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-021-00615-4
[9]
Sarvari, H. (2021) Barriers to Development of Private Sector Investment in Water and Sewage Industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11, 52-70.
https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-11-2019-0110
[10]
Swishchuk, A. (2021) Hawkes Processes in Insurance: Risk Model, Application to Empirical Data and Optimal Investment. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 101, 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.12.005
[11]
Zetzsche, D. A. (2022) Regulating Sustainable Finance in the Dark. European Business Organization Law Review, 23, 47-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-021-00237-9
