Objective: To assess the influence of previous abdominal and pelvic surgeries on uterine artery embolization (UAE). We hypothesize that the formation of postoperative adhesions can impose technical difficulties for UAE, resulting in longer fluoroscopy time and less reduction of uterus and largest tumor volumes after the procedure. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 122 consecutive patients who underwent uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine fibroids in our department. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of previous abdominal or pelvic surgery. Fluoroscopy time, change in symptoms, and volume variation of uterus and largest tumor were compared between groups. Results: Forty-seven patients underwent abdominopelvic surgery before UAE (Group 1) and 75 did not (Group 2). Median (IQR) fluoroscopy time was 22 minutes (IQR: 18 - 26.4) for Group 1, and 23.3 minutes (IQR: 19.05 - 28.25) for Group 2. No difference was found between the groups (P = 0.17). Regarding the results after UAE, neither the change in symptoms (P = 0.30) nor the volume variation for uterus (P = 0.41) and largest fibroid (P = 0.18) showed significant difference. Conclusions: In this study, previous abdominopelvic surgeries had no significant influence on fluoroscopy time, and overall outcomes of uterine artery embolization.
References
[1]
Diamond, M.P. and Freeman, M.L. (2001) Clinical Implications of Postsurgical Adhesions. Human Reproduction Update, 7, 567-576.
https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/7.6.567
[2]
Stommel, M.W.J., Ten Broek, R.P.G., Strik, C., et al. (2018) Multicenter Observational Study of Adhesion Formation after Open- and Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer. Annals of Surgery, 267, 743-748.
https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002175
[3]
Menzies, D. and Ellis, H. (1990) Intestinal Obstruction from Adhesions: How Big Is the Problem? Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 72, 60-63.
[4]
Beyene, R.T., Kavalukas, S.L. and Barbul, A. (2015) Intra-Abdominal Adhesions: Anatomy, Physiology, Pathophysiology, and Treatment. Current Problems in Surgery, 52, 271-319. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpsurg.2015.05.001
[5]
Kato, H. and Kuwatsuru, R. (2018) Anatomy of Uterine Blood Supply and the Prevention of Massive Hemorrhage. In: Takeda, S., Kuwatsuru, R., Eds., Gynecologic and Obstetric Prophylactic Hemostasis by Intra-Arterial Balloon Occlusion, Springer Singapore, Singapore, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8833-9_1
[6]
Maciel, C., Tang, Y.Z., Sahdev, A., et al. (2017) Preprocedural MRI and MRA in Planning Fibroid Embolization. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 23, 163-171.
https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2016.16623
[7]
Petros, H., Michalis, K., Athanasios, T. and Savvas, H. (2019) Huge Intravaginal Pedunculated Fibroid Embolization and Resectoscopy: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Surgical Science, 10, 222-228.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ss.2019.107024
[8]
Spies, J.B. (2003) Uterine Artery Embolization for Fibroids: Understanding the Technical Causes of Failure. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 14, 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000052286.26939.f9
[9]
Schirf, B.E., Vogelzang, R.L. and Chrisman, H.B. (2006) Complications of Uterine Fibroid Embolization. Seminars in Interventional Radiology, 23, 143-149.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-941444
[10]
von Elm, E., Altman, D.G., Egger, M., et al. (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147, 573-577.
https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
[11]
Ishisaki, J.Y., Kato, H., Zhang, X., et al. (2022) Comparison of 1.5 T and 3 T Non-Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography for Visualization of Uterine and Ovarian Arteries before Uterine Artery Embolization. European Radiology, 32, 470-476.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08141-z
[12]
ten Broek, R.P., Strik, C., Issa, Y., et al. (2013) Adhesiolysis-Related Morbidity in Abdominal Surgery. Annals of Surgery, 258, 98-106.
https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826f4969
Elsharkawy, S., Elrashidy, A., Badran, N., Ekbal, G., Yakob, S., Elnagar, S., Elaggan, A., Mostafa, A. and Abdelaziz, M. (2021) Viable Second Trimester Cervical Ectopic Pregnancy Managed Successfully with Uterine Preservation: Case Report. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11, 1236-1247.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2021.119117
[15]
Coleman, M.G., McLain, A.D. and Moran, B.J. (2000) Impact of Previous Surgery on Time Taken for Incision and Division of Adhesions during Laparotomy. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 43, 1297-1299. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237441
[16]
ten Broek, R.P., Issa, Y., van Santbrink, E.J., et al. (2013) Burden of Adhesions in Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery: Systematic Review and Met-Analysis. BMJ, 347, f5588. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5588
