全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

中国传统法律文化的现代转化
The Modern Transformation of Traditional Chinese Legal Culture

DOI: 10.12677/DS.2024.101011, PP. 76-85

Keywords: 法律文化,现代转化,无讼,调解制度
Legal Culture
, Modern Transformation, No Litigation, Mediation System

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

“无讼”思想影响下的传统调解制度,作为中国传统法律文化思想的重要组成部分,是乡土社会礼治秩序下的特有产物,有其存在的社会根源、思想文化根源以及政治根源。对于传统中国而言,调解制度是适应社会需求和实现社会和谐的一种合理手段,具备一定的正当性和实践价值。在走向法治社会的今天,它在维系社会和谐稳定、构建多元化纠纷解决机制方面依然存在着一定的镜鉴作用。但“无讼”的理念和传统调解制度的存在也受到特定历史阶段和社会的限制,存在一定的局限性。随着社会多元化的发展,在推进社会治理现代化和新时代“枫桥经验”以及在尊重中国的法律文化传统和实际需求的基础上,传统调解制度进行现代转化是必然之势。通过重塑理念和价值取向,旨在达到道德教化和法律程序的有机平衡,让传统调解制度更多地关注人的尊严与权利。同时,从实践中反思现行制度的不足,提出完善人民调解制度和司法调解制度,构建新的基层治理模式助力“无讼”思想的进一步实现。
As an important part of Chinese traditional legal culture, the traditional mediation system under the influence of the idea of “no litigation” is a unique product under the etiquette and rule order of rural society, and has its social, ideological and cultural roots as well as political roots. For traditional China, the mediation system is a reasonable means to meet the social needs and achieve social harmony, which has certain legitimacy and practical value. In today’s society of the rule of law, it still has a certain mirror role in maintaining social harmony and stability and building a diversified dispute resolution mechanism. However, the concept of “no litigation” and the existence of traditional mediation system are also restricted by specific historical stages and society, and there are certain limitations. With the development of social diversification, on the basis of promoting the modernization of social governance, “Fengqiao experience” in the new era, and respecting China’s legal culture tradition and actual needs, it is an inevitable trend for the traditional mediation system to be transformed into a modern one. By reshaping the concept and value orientation, it aims to achieve an organic balance between moral education and legal procedures, and make the traditional mediation system pay more attention to human dignity and rights. At the same time, reflecting on the shortcomings of the current system from practice, it is proposed to improve the people’s mediation system and judicial mediation system, and build a new grass-roots governance model to help further realize the idea of “no litigation”.

References

[1]  郭建, 金敏, 周东平, 马建红, 张仁善. 中国法制史[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2011: 520.
[2]  邹涛. 古代无讼法律思想对现代纠纷解决的作用——以民间法为视角[J]. 民间法, 2017, 19(1): 77-86.
[3]  方潇. 孔子“无讼”思想的变异及其原因分析——兼论对我国当前司法调解的启示[J]. 法商研究, 2013, 30(1): 152-160.
[4]  郭星华. 无讼、厌讼与抑讼——对中国传统诉讼文化的法社会学分析[J]. 学术月刊, 2014, 46(9): 88-95.
[5]  滋贺秀三. 中国法文化的考察——以诉讼的形态为素材[J]. 比较法研究, 1988(3): 18-26.
[6]  [法]勒内?达维德. 当代世界主要法律体系[M]. 上海: 上海译文出版, 1984: 487.
[7]  游志强. “无讼”思想对中国古代法制的影响与当代启示[J]. 华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(4): 129-138.
[8]  顾元. 以和为贵、天下无讼的价值理念及其在现代社会治理中的运用[J]. 人民检察, 2023(15): 66-71.
[9]  张晋藩. 中国法律的传统与近代转型[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2009: 332-343.
[10]  名公书判清明集[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1987: 199-371.
[11]  范忠信. 情理法与中国人[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2011: 150.
[12]  费孝通. 乡土中国[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2012: 93.
[13]  李乐君. 论传统调解制度及其当代转型[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2013.
[14]  江国华, 胡玉桃. 论行政调解——以社会纠纷解决方式的多元化为视角[J]. 江汉大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 28(3): 72-78.
[15]  苏力. 基层法院审判委员会制度的考察及思考[J]. 北大法律评论, 1998(2): 320-364.
[16]  [美]E?博登海默. 法理学——法哲学及其方法[M]. 邓正来, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1999: 350.
[17]  苏力. 农村基层法院的纠纷解决与规则之治[J]. 北大法律评论, 1999(1): 80-99.
[18]  王建勋. 关于调解制度的思考[J]. 法商研究(中南政法学院学报), 1996(6): 76.
[19]  苏力. 法治及其本土资源[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1996: 6.
[20]  张中秋. 中西法律文化比较研究[M]. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 1991: 298.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413