全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

海洋环境污染若干法律问题研究——以海南省海口市人民检察院诉海南A公司等三被告非法向海洋倾倒建筑垃圾民事公益诉讼等案为例
Research on Some Legal Issues of Marine En-vironmental Pollution—Taking Haikou City People’s Procuratorate of Hainan Province v. Hainan Company A and Other Three Defendants in the Civil Public Interest Litigation Case of Illegally Dumping Construction Waste into the Sea as an Example

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2024.121006, PP. 37-42

Keywords: 海洋环境,公益诉讼,海事赔偿责任限制
Marine Environment
, Public Interest Litigation, Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

海洋的广阔面积和陆上河流湖泊交壤使得海洋生态环境质量受污面广,对于海洋污染防治需要多部门联动,无论是陆源污染还是船舶排污,污染责任人需承担民事责任。在海洋环境公益诉讼中,海洋环境监督管理部门可提诉讼,社会组织不具有适格原告资格,海洋环境公益诉讼的专业性会将社会组织拒之门外,一定程度上窄化了对海洋污染行为的监督,某种程度上来说不利于海洋污染防治工作更好开展,而盲目扩大适格原告范围也会衍生出诸多问题。海事赔偿责任限制在一定程度上减轻了责任人的赔偿负担,我国现行相关制度也在发挥其重大作用。
The vast area of the ocean and the interlocked with rivers and lakes on land make the Marine ecological environment quality suffer from a wide range of pollution. For Marine pollution prevention and control, multi-sectoral linkage is needed. Whether it is land-based pollution or ship discharge, the pollution responsible person needs to bear civil liability. In Marine environmental public interest litigation, Marine environmental supervision and management departments can bring lawsuits, social organizations are not qualified as plaintiffs, and the professionalism of Marine environmental public interest litigation will exclude social organizations, narrow the supervision of Marine pollution behavior to a certain extent, and to some extent, it is not conducive to the better development of Marine pollution prevention and control work. And blindly expanding the scope of qualified plaintiffs will also give rise to many problems. The Limitation of liability for maritime claims reduces the burden of compensation of the responsible person to a certain extent, and the relevant system in our country is also playing an important role.

References

[1]  王淑梅, 汪洋, 李兵. 《中海发展股份有限公司货轮公司申请设立海事赔偿责任限制基金案》的理解与参照[J]. 人民司法, 2014(6): 78-82.
[2]  别涛, 季林云. 生态环境损害赔偿制度化的新阶段——《生态环境损害赔偿管理规定》解读[J]. 环境保护, 2022, 50(9): 11-13.
[3]  刘乔发, 杨钉. 海事赔偿责任限制基金程序与破产程序冲突及解决路径[J]. 法律适用, 2018(21): 21-25.
[4]  陈幸欢. 生态环境损害赔偿司法认定的规则厘定与规范进路——以第24批环境审判指导性案例为样本[J]. 法学评论, 2021, 39(1): 153-164.
[5]  王秀卫. 海洋生态环境损害赔偿制度立法进路研究——以《海洋环境保护法》修改为背景[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2021, 24(1): 76-86.
[6]  吴一冉. 生态环境损害赔偿诉讼举证责任相关问题探析[J]. 法律适用, 2020(7): 11-19.
[7]  赵珂, 石磊. 《阿斯特克有限公司申请设立海事赔偿责任限制基金案》的理解与参照——海事赔偿责任限制基金中事故原则判断之阐明[J]. 人民司法, 2021(32): 25-27.
[8]  韩英夫. 生态环境损害赔偿制度的规范协同模式[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2022(4): 29-41.
[9]  王凯悦. 国内沿海船舶与国际航线船舶的碰撞责任限额——南京四通船务有限责任公司申请设立海事赔偿责任限制基金案[J]. 航海, 2022(2): 15-17.
[10]  程玉. 我国生态环境损害赔偿制度的理论基础和制度完善[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2022(1): 75-90.
[11]  宋瑞秋, 耿利君. 海事赔偿责任限制基金设立程序的检视与完善[J]. 中国海商法研究, 2018, 29(4): 28-35.
[12]  李梦琦, Kathinka Furst. 挪威海洋环境保护政策及其启示[J]. 浙江海洋大学学报(人文科学版), 2020, 37(6): 56-60.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413