全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

刑法视野下公开个人信息的保护
Protection of Public Personal Information from the Perspective of Criminal Law

DOI: 10.12677/DS.2024.101013, PP. 92-98

Keywords: 个人信息,已公开信息,个人信息合理使用,情急脉络完整性理论
Personal Information
, Publicly Available Information, Reasonable Use of Personal Information, The Completeness Theory of Emotional Urgency

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

已公开个人信息是数字时代的重要货币。然而,当前却出现大量侵犯公民信息权益,但司法实务部门无法做到重点打击的现象,对于“经被收集者同意”条款的解读偏差、坚守“知情同意”而过度依赖“二次授权”规则都是导致这一困境的原因,究其本质,是刑事立法滞后性带来的负面影响。本文以此为问题导向,深刻把握法秩序统一性原理,结合前置法,有效限缩“知情同意规则”,将“合理处理”原则作为规制“未经同意出售、提供公开个人信息”行为的指导原则,基于“情景脉络完整性”理论,按照个人自行公开与其他已经合法公开两种形式对“合理”标准的判断构建路径,以期对未来刑事的立法与司法有所帮助。
Public personal information is an important currency in the digital age. However, there are currently a large number of violations of citizens’ information rights, but judicial practice departments are unable to focus on cracking down on them. The interpretation deviation of the “consent of the collected” clause and the excessive reliance on the “second authorization” rule due to the adherence to “informed consent” are the reasons for this dilemma. In essence, it is the negative impact caused by the lagging criminal legislation. This article takes this as a problem-oriented approach, deeply grasps the principle of the unity of legal order, and combines the pre existing law to effectively limit the “informed consent rule”. The “reasonable processing” principle is used as a guiding principle to regulate the behavior of “selling and providing public personal information without consent”. Based on the “completeness of the context” theory, a path is constructed to judge the “reasonable” standard in two forms: personal self disclosure and other legally disclosed forms, to be helpful for future criminal legislation and justice.

References

[1]  财经E法. 司法信息公开与个人信息保护, 能否两全? [EB/OL].
https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1779641434608642990&wfr=spider&for=pc, 2023-10-13.
[2]  王海洋, 郭春镇. 公开的个人信息的认定与处理规则[J]. 苏州大学学报(法学版), 2021(4): 64-76.
[3]  喻海松. 《民法典》视域下侵犯公民个人信息罪的司法适用[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 33(6): 1-8.
[4]  刘艳红. 民法典编纂背景下侵犯公民个人信息罪的保护法益: 信息自决权——以刑名一体化及《民法总则》第111条为视角[J]. 浙江工商大学学报, 2019(6): 20-32.
[5]  刘双阳. 论个人信息自决权刑事司法保护的边界——以已公开个人信息为中心的分析[J]. 人权, 2021(5): 148-162.
[6]  王华伟. 已公开个人信息的刑法保护[J]. 法学研究, 2022(2): 191-208.
[7]  Nissenbaum, H. (2004) Privacy as Contextual Integrity. Washington Law Review, 79, 119-157.
[8]  倪蕴帷. 隐私权在美国法中的理论演进与概念重构——基于情境脉络完整性理论的分析及其对中国法的启示[J]. 政治与法律, 2019(10): 149-161.
[9]  刘双阳. “合理处理”与侵犯公民个人信息罪的出罪机制[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2021(6): 57-72.
[10]  [美]海伦?尼森鲍姆, 王苑 译. 何为场景?——隐私场景理论中场景概念之解析[J]. 网络信息法学研究, 2021(1): 3-28, 236.
[11]  陈峰. 公开的工商企业登记信息也可成为公民个人信息[J/OL].
https://ahlx.pkulaw.com/qikan/6b85a9779c14b8c50d2e66d45c37fbbdbdfb.html?way=listView, 2023-10-19.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413