全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

提供劳务者受害责任纠纷下的用人者责任
The Employer Liability under the Dispute for the Labor Provider Injury

DOI: 10.12677/DS.2024.101016, PP. 113-117

Keywords: 提供劳务者受害责任纠纷,雇主责任,劳务关系,无过错责任, Employer’s Liability, Labor Relationship, No-Fault Liability

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

实践中,出于诸如劳动者已经退休而不能缴纳工伤保险、用人单位尚未依法登记等原因,用人单位仅与劳动者签订劳务合同的情况非常普遍。依《民法典》第1192条第1款的规定,个人劳务关系下提供劳务者受害的,接受劳务一方承担过错责任。然而,针对用人单位与个人之间形成劳务关系的情形,法律并没有规定相应的归责原则,司法人员在处理此类案件时往往会面临法律适用的困境。此外,此类纠纷中个人与非个人劳务关系的区分标准以及第三人侵权下追偿权的问题,有待明确。
In practice, it is very common for employers to sign labor contracts with workers for reasons such as the company can’t pay the insurance for retired employees, or the company has not registered according to law. According to the third sentence of Article 1192, paragraph 1, of the “Civil Code”, if the provider of the labor service under the personal labor relationship is harmed, the party receiving the labor service shall bear the fault liability. However, the current law does not have the corresponding principle of liability in the case of the formation of labor relations between employers and individuals, and judicial personnel often face the dilemma of law application when dealing with such cases. In addition, the distinction between personal and non-personal service relations in such disputes, as well as the right of recourse under third party infringement, remains to be clarified.

References

[1]  景春兰. 对雇主“替代责任说”的反思与批判[J]. 政法论丛, 2016(4): 103-109.
[2]  环建芬. 雇主责任的归责原则和雇佣活动的适用范围辨析[J]. 政治与法律, 2007(1): 150-155.
[3]  程啸. 侵权责任法[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2015.
[4]  毛瑞兆. 论雇主的替代责任[J]. 政法论坛(中国政法大学学报), 2004(3): 129-137.
[5]  李瑞. 也论雇佣关系与个人劳务关系[N]. 人民法院报, 2016-06-22(7).
[6]  程啸. 未来民法典侵权责任编中用人者责任制度的完善[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018(5): 36-42.
[7]  郑尚元. 工伤保险法律制度研究[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2004.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413