全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

“技术–制度”视角下“接诉即办”机制逻辑探究——基于北京市朝阳区劲松社区的案例分析
Responding to Complaints Promptly: Exploring the Logic of the “Responding to Complaints Immediately” Mechanism from the Perspective of “Technology-Institution”—A Case Study Based on the Jingsong Community in Chaoyang District, Beijing

DOI: 10.12677/MM.2024.141006, PP. 38-44

Keywords: 接诉即办,社区治理,技术嵌入,制度规范
Responding to Complaints Immediately
, Community Governance, Technological Integration, Institutional Norms

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

社区是国家治理的“末梢神经”,是畅通基层治理的“毛细血管”,在国家治理体系中具有承上启下的枢纽作用。然而,当前社区治理在行政力量与自治力量的磨合、治理政策实施与实际需求的匹配度、行政权力对基层自治空间的介入等方面仍存在缺陷。本研究以北京市朝阳区劲松社区“接诉即办”改革为例,基于“技术–制度”互构的理论框架,通过分析治理创新中技术嵌入与制度保障的互动、调试,探究“微社区”建设背景下“接诉即办”的创新模式与实现路径,旨在为基层治理体系现代化提供新的思考。
The community is considered the “peripheral nerve” of national governance, serving as the “capillary” for smooth grassroots governance and playing a pivotal role in the national governance system. However, current community governance still exhibits deficiencies in areas such as the coordination between administrative and autonomous forces, the alignment of governance policy implementation with actual needs, and the intervention of administrative power in grassroots autonomous space. Taking the “responding to complaints immediately” reform in the Jingsong community of Chaoyang District, Beijing, as an example, this study, based on the theoretical framework of “technology-institution” interaction, explores the innovation model and implementation path of “handling complaints immediately” under the background of constructing “micro-communities”. The aim is to provide new insights for the modernization of grassroots governance systems.

References

[1]  习近平提出提高保障和改善民生水平加强和创新社会治理[EB/OL]. 2017-10-27. https://www.gov.cn/zhuanti/2017-10/27/content_5234876.htm, 2023-06-07.
[2]  国务院关于加强基层治理体系和治理能力现代化建设的意见[EB/OL]. 2021-07-11. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-07/11/content_5624201.htm, 2023-06-07.
[3]  习近平在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL]. 2022-10-16. https://www.12371.cn/special/20da/bg/, 2023-06-07.
[4]  沈费伟. 技术嵌入与制度吸纳: 提高政府技术治理绩效的运作逻辑[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2021, 43(2): 80-86.
https://doi.org/10.15994/j.1000-0763.2021.02.011
[5]  彭亚平. 技术治理的悖论: 一项民意调查的政治过程及其结果[J]. 社会, 2018, 38(3): 46-78.
https://doi.org/10.15992/j.cnki.31-1123/c.2018.03.002
[6]  曾智洪, 游晨, 陈煜超. 积极型政府数字化危机治理: 动员策略与理论源流——以抗击新冠肺炎疫情为例[J]. 电子政务, 2021(3): 61-72.
https://doi.org/10.16582/j.cnki.dzzw.2021.03.006
[7]  庞锐. 制度弹性: 技术治理刚性风险的生成逻辑与化解路径——基于城市网格化管理的比较案例分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2022(5): 73-80.
https://doi.org/10.19735/j.issn.1006-0863.2022.05.09
[8]  盛明科, 贺清波. 数字技术治理风险的生成与防治路径探析——以技术与制度互构论为视角[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 47(2): 16-23.
https://doi.org/10.13715/j.cnki.jxupss.2023.02.009
[9]  杨守涛. 诉办关系变迁与基层治理样态演化——被动式回应与主动式回应的两分及其超越[J]. 中国行政管理, 2022(1): 105-111.
https://doi.org/10.19735/j.issn.1006-0863.2022.01.14
[10]  杨宏山, 李悟. 技术嵌入、双轨学习与城市治理的机制设计——基于B市基层治理改革的案例分析[J]. 公共管理与政策评论, 2022, 11(3): 107-115.
[11]  马超, 金炜玲, 孟天广. 基于政务热线的基层治理新模式——以北京市“接诉即办”改革为例[J]. 北京行政学院学报, 2020(5): 39-47.
https://doi.org/10.16365/j.cnki.11-4054/d.2020.05.00

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413