全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

我国知识产权民事纠纷的行政解决机制研究
Study on the Administrative Settlement Mechanism of Intellectual Property Civil Disputes in China

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2024.121026, PP. 171-178

Keywords: 知识产权民事纠纷,行政解决机制,多元解决机制
Intellectual Property Civil Disputes
, Administrative Settlement Mechanism, Multi-Disciplinary Mechanism

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目前,知识经济的时代已经到来,知识产权在国内外越来越受到重视,知识产权产生的民事纠纷数量也日益增多。知识产权行政解决能够为知识产权提供行政权的“治安保护”,在知识产权民事纠纷司法诉讼压力逐渐增大的情况下,行政解决的参与就显得十分重要,不仅能够切实保护知识产权、健全知识产权治理体系,还可以减轻司法诉讼的压力、提高知识产权纠纷解决的效率。然而我国对于行政参与的正当性依旧争论激烈,且行政解决在实践中也仍存在一些不足与问题。因此,为进一步明确行政解决参与知识产权民事纠纷的意义,优化和完善知识产权行政执法,本文将对知识产权民事纠纷的含义进行深度理解,并对行政解决参与的必要性与合理性进行论述,同时针对知识产权民事纠纷行政解决机制在实践中存在的问题提出完善建议。
At present, the era of knowledge economy has come, intellectual property rights at home and abroad more and more attention, intellectual property rights generated by the number of civil dis-putes is also increasing. Intellectual property administrative settlement for intellectual property rights can provide administrative rights of “security protection”, in the case of intellectual property rights civil disputes judicial litigation pressure gradually increased, the participation of adminis-trative settlement is very important, not only can effectively protect intellectual property rights, improve intellectual property rights governance system, but also reduce the pressure of judicial litigation, improve the efficiency of intellectual property rights dispute resolution. However, the legitimacy of administrative participation is still hotly debated in China, and there are still some deficiencies and problems in administrative settlement in practice. Therefore, in order to further clarify the significance of administrative settlement of intellectual property civil disputes, optimise and improve the administrative enforcement of intellectual property rights, this paper will provide an in-depth understanding of the meaning of intellectual property civil disputes, and discuss the necessity and reasonableness of the participation of administrative settlement, and put forward suggestions to improve the administrative settlement mechanism of intellectual property civil disputes in practice.

References

[1]  杨立新. 《中华人民共和国民法典》条文精释与实案全析[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2020.
[2]  何兵. 和谐社会与纠纷解决机制[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2007.
[3]  王迁. 知识产权法教程[M]. 第七版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2007: 13.
[4]  冯晓青, 刘淑华. 试论知识产权的私权属性及其公权化趋向[J]. 中国法学, 2004(1): 63-70.
[5]  李永明, 吕益林. 论知识产权之公权性质——对“知识产权属于私权”的补充[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2004(4): 61-68.
[6]  李春晖, 林子韬. 健全知识产权行政保护体系之重点任务[J]. 中国市场监管研究, 2022(7): 46-50.
[7]  焦娜. 论知识产权的行政保护与司法救济[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国政法大学, 2010.
[8]  (英)罗伯茨, (英)彭文浩. 纠纷解决过程[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2011.
[9]  提高涉外知识产权执法司法质效[N]. 人民政协报, 2021-11-03(003).
[10]  孙涛. 知识产权纠纷多元化解决机制研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 云南大学, 2021.
[11]  张博. 涉外知识产权纠纷法律适用的适当性探析——基于人民法院涉外知识产权案件的研究[J]. 广西社会科学, 2019(2): 124-127.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413