全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

刑事诉讼被追诉人权利制度建设
Construction of the Rights System of the Accused in Criminal Litigation

DOI: 10.12677/DS.2024.101048, PP. 351-362

Keywords: 人权,人权保障,刑事诉讼,被追诉人,程序正义
Human Rights
, Human Rights Protection, Criminal Proceedings, Defendants, Procedural Justice

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

人权是每个人作为一个人应享有的基本权利。我国已进入中国特色社会主义新时代,法治建设也取得了显著进步,国家对人权保障问题也越来越重视。虽然我国人权保障事业已经取得了许多成就,但是刑事诉讼被追诉人的人权被侵害的现象仍然存在。刑事诉讼兼具惩罚犯罪和保护人民的双重使命,要兼顾实体正义和程序正义,让人民群众在每一个案件中都看到公平与正义。本文结合我国对刑事诉讼被追诉人人权保障的法律规定及司法实践,探究其中存在的一些问题,并提出在立法领域明确无罪推定原则及沉默权,在司法领域加强对侵害被追诉人权利的监督,在意识形态领域提高全社会重视保护被追诉人人权的意识等建议。由此,希望能为刑事诉讼被追诉人人权保障建设提供一份力量。
Human rights are the fundamental rights that every person should enjoy as an individual. China has entered a new era of socialism with Chinese characteristics, and significant progress has been made in the construction of the rule of law. The country is also paying increasing attention to the issue of human rights protection. Although many achievements have been made in China’s human rights protection cause, the phenomenon of human rights violations against individuals prosecuted in criminal proceedings still exists. Criminal litigation has a dual mission of punishing crimes and protecting the people. It is necessary to balance substantive justice and procedural justice, so that the people can see fairness and justice in every case. This article combines the legal provisions and judicial practice in China to protect the rights of all prosecuted persons in criminal proceedings, explores some existing problems, and proposes suggestions such as clarifying the principle of presumption of innocence and the right to silence in the legislative field, strengthening supervision of infringement on the rights of prosecuted persons in the judicial field, and raising awareness of the whole society’s importance in protecting the rights of all prosecuted persons in the field of ideology. Therefore, we hope to provide a contribution to the construction of human rights protection for those prosecuted in criminal proceedings.

References

[1]  李美荣, 孙文红. 论刑事附带民事诉讼中被害人的精神损害赔偿[J]. 理论界, 2011(7): 76-77.
[2]  徐亚文. 程序正义论[M]. 济南: 山东人民出版社, 2004: 18-20.
[3]  张文显. 法理学前沿论坛(第一卷) [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003: 389.
[4]  林品. 当代中国人权保障法律制度研究[M]. 济南: 山东人民出社, 2007: 131.
[5]  冯军, 王成. 罪刑法定原则的价值、困境及其出路[J]. 河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2007, 32(6): 8-10.
[6]  古瑞华. 部分前科报告制度的提出与展开[J]. 广西社会科学, 2011(9): 89-92.
[7]  江必新, 程虎. 司法程序终结问题研究[J]. 法律适用, 2013(7): 12-21.
[8]  陈卫民, 罗欣, 张程, 张哲, 张富兴. 人权保障理念下职务犯罪侦查模式的转变——以新刑诉法实施后职务犯罪侦查为视角[J]. 政法学刊, 2013(5): 84-90.
[9]  周忆. 浅论侦查程序中的人权保障[J]. 新乡学院学报, 2010(2): 35-38.
[10]  李晓. 论口供在刑事司法裁判中之地位——兼评“口供中心主义”与“口供抛弃主义” [J]. 行政与法, 2017(2): 114-122.
[11]  陈兴良. 法治的使命[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2001: 409.
[12]  樊崇义. 沉默权与我国的刑事政策[J]. 法学论坛, 2001(3): 78-82.
[13]  韩大元. 完善人权司法保障制度[J]. 法商研究, 2014(3): 19-22.
[14]  林斌. 如何通过完善刑事强制措施来保障人权[J]. 开封教育学院学报, 2016, 36(12): 218-219.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413