全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

反家暴视角下受害者民事权益的完善
Improving the Civil Rights and Interests of Victims from the Perspective of Anti Domestic Violence

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2024.121038, PP. 273-279

Keywords: 家庭暴力,人身安全保护令,民事救济制度
Domestic Violence
, Personal Safety Protection Orders, Civil Relief Systems

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

家庭暴力问题自古以来都困扰着全球范围内的民众,是一项世界性难题,各个国家都制定了法律来预防、制止和纠正家庭暴力。自2016年我国颁布《反家庭暴力法》以来,家庭暴力似乎不再仅仅是家庭内部问题,而是法律所明令禁止的违法行为。同时,公众对于如何通过民事救济手段来维护自身权益的认识也发生了显著变化。《民法典》规定的离婚损害赔偿和监护人制度的撤销等条款也随着公众对家庭暴力问题的认知逐渐广泛应用。然而,随着家庭暴力民事救济制度的广泛应用,也出现了一些制度运行中的问题逐渐浮出水面。本文从反家庭暴力的视角出发,首先阐述了我国反家庭暴力法律制度的发展,其次分析了我国反家庭暴力的现状以及现有法律在人身安全保护令、精神类家庭暴力、家庭暴力的民事赔偿责任等方面的空白,认为我国在反家庭暴力的法律规制中仍然存在很大的不足,并提出相关规定的进一步完善措施,以保护家庭暴力受害者的民事权益。
The issue of domestic violence has been a global problem that has plagued people worldwide since ancient times. Each country has enacted laws to prevent, stop, and correct domestic violence. Since the promulgation of the Anti Domestic Violence Law in 2016, it seems that domestic violence is no longer just an internal issue within the family, but rather an illegal act prohibited by law. At the same time, the public’s understanding of how to protect their own rights and interests through civil remedies has also undergone significant changes. The provisions on divorce damages compensation and the revocation of the guardianship system stipulated in the Civil Code have gradually been widely applied with the public’s awareness of domestic violence issues. However, with the widespread application of the civil relief system for domestic violence, some problems in the operation of the system have gradually emerged. From the perspective of anti domestic violence, this article analyzes the current situation of anti domestic violence in China and the gaps in existing laws in terms of personal safety protection orders, mental domestic violence, and civil compensation liability for domestic violence. It proposes further improvement measures for relevant regulations to protect the civil rights and interests of victims of domestic violence.

References

[1]  赵树坤, 胡艾雄. 中国“反家庭暴力”话语实践变迁及其逻辑[J]. 求是学刊, 2022, 49(6): 94-104.
[2]  周鑫, 谷玉爽. 反家庭暴力法视域下妇女权益法律保护研究[J]. 民主法制建设, 2022(3): 40-42.
[3]  林美卿, 贺羡. 我国女性遭受家庭暴力问题研究[J]. 山东社会科学, 2010(6): 56-57+64.
[4]  最高法: 截至去年底全国法院共签发人身安全保护令5749份[EB/OL]. 中国网. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1684318571977459748&wfr=spider&for=pc, 2023-10-28.
[5]  何银松. 论家庭暴力与青少年犯罪[J]. 当代青年研究, 2007(10): 14-18.
[6]  戴瑞君. 我国妇女权益公益诉讼刍议[J]. 内蒙古社会科学, 2022, 43(5): 86-95.
[7]  李瀚琰. 家庭暴力婚内损害赔偿制度入典再分析——基于人格权保护的理论视角[J]. 山东社会科学, 2020(12): 91-95.
[8]  刘艺. 妇女权益保障领域检察公益诉讼机制的理论基础与实现路径[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 28(2): 171-182.
[9]  王利明. 论人格权编与侵权责任编的区分与衔接[J]. 比较法研究, 2018(2): 1-11.
[10]  张莹. 婚内侵权损害赔偿中的妇女权益保护问题[J]. 山东社会科学, 2007(10): 91-93.
[11]  陈英. 婚内侵权行为的民事责任承担[J]. 政法学刊, 2010, 27(4): 23-26.
[12]  张剑源. 家庭暴力为何难以被认定?——以涉家暴离婚案件为中心的实证研究[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018(4): 103-111.
[13]  孙海涛. 论家庭暴力案件调解筛查制度的构建[J]. 理论月刊, 2018(4): 119-126.

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413