|
诉讼过程中超过受诉法院级别管辖范围的研究分析
|
Abstract:
级别管辖恒定指级别管辖按起诉时的诉讼标的额确定后,不因诉讼过程中标的额增加或减少而变动。我国关于级别管辖的法律规定经历了一个由级别管辖恒定到否定级别管辖恒定的时期,但全面否定级别管辖恒定在司法实践中产生了许多问题和弊端。本文将对诉讼过程中当事人增加诉讼标的额超过受诉法院级别管辖范围的情况进行分析,并结合域外司法研究进行讨论,并提出增加诉前承诺环节的建议,用于排除当事人恶意因素对审查程序的影响,提高司法实务效率。
Grade jurisdiction constant refers to the level of jurisdiction determined based on the lawsuit’s amount at the time of filing, which remains unchanged despite fluctuations in the amount during litigation. China’s legal provisions on level jurisdiction have transitioned from grade jurisdiction constant to negative level jurisdiction constant. However, the comprehensive negative level jurisdiction constant has encountered challenges and drawbacks in judicial practice. This paper analyzes situations where the parties’ claim amounts surpass the court’s jurisdiction during litigation, engages with external judicial research, and proposes suggestions to enhance prelitigation commitments. This aims to eliminate the influence of malicious factors from the parties on the review procedure and improve the efficiency of judicial practice.
[1] | 赵泽君, 林洋. 论民事级别管辖恒定[J]. 学术探索, 2018(8): 81-88. |
[2] | 江伟. 民事诉讼法[M]. 第三版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2007: 124 |
[3] | 潘剑锋. 民事诉讼法学教程[M]. 第五版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2018: 83 |
[4] | [德]罗森贝克 施瓦布, 著. 德国民事诉讼法[M]. 李大雪, 译. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2007: 200 |
[5] | [日]中村英郎, 著. 新民事诉讼法讲义[M]. 陈刚, 林剑锋, 郭美松, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2001: 128 |
[6] | [日]三月章. 民事诉讼法[M]. 第三版. 东京: 弘文堂, 1986: 186. |
[7] | 张卫平. 民事诉讼法[M]. 第四版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2016: 1 |
[8] | 德国民事诉讼法[M]. 丁启明, 译. 厦门: 厦门大学出版社, 2016: 1. |