全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

共情能力、社会距离与择偶复制效应的关系研究
Research on the Relationship between Empathy, Social Distance and Mate-Choice Copying Effect

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2024.141019, PP. 134-140

Keywords: 择偶复制,共情能力,社会距离
Mate-Choice Copying
, Empathy Ability, Social Distance

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

不管是霸屏的偶像剧还是稳居阅读榜首的言情类小说,我们发现其受众绝大多数是女性,营造的角色形象都是极受异性喜欢的人,且这些都对女性的择偶产生了重要影响,其中起作用的心理机制是我们要探索的重要问题。查阅文献发现,在择偶的过程中,我们会模仿学习同性别他人的择偶选择,提高择偶准确性,降低择偶失败所带来的风险,择偶中这种社会学习行为被定义为择偶复制。因此,我们推测影视剧等之所以对女性择偶产生影响是因为发生了择偶复制行为,以往研究主要对影响择偶复制效应的外部因素进行探索,缺乏对内部作用机制的研究,现有研究指出择偶复制效应的发生涉及基于共情脑区的社会学习,共情反应又会因个体与共情对象的相似性、亲密程度而不同,因此本文将重点论述择偶复制效应与共情能力以及社会距离的关系问题,探究择偶复制效应发生的内部作用机制。
Whether it’s idol dramas that dominate the screen or romantic novels that consistently rank at the top of the reading list, we have found that the vast majority of their audiences are women, creating character images that are highly favored by the opposite sex. These have had a significant impact on women’s mate selection, and the psychological mechanisms at play are important issues that we need to explore. According to literature review, it has been found that in the process of mate selec-tion, we imitate and learn the choices of others of the same sex, improve the accuracy of mate selec-tion, and reduce the risk of mate failure. This social learning behavior in mate selection is defined as mate-choice copying. Therefore, we speculate that the reason why movies and TV dramas have an impact on women’s mate selection is due to the occurrence of mate-choice copying behavior. Previ-ous studies have mainly explored the external factors that affect the mate-choice copying effect, but there is a lack of research on the internal mechanism of action. Existing studies have pointed out that the occurrence of mate-choice copying effect involves social learning based on empathy brain regions, and the empathetic response may vary depending on the similarity and intimacy between the individual and the empathetic object, so this article will focus on discussing the relationship between mate-choice copying effect, empathy, and social distance, exploring the internal mecha-nism of mate-choice copying effect.

References

[1]  陈海贤, 何贵兵(2014). 心理距离对跨期选择和风险选择的影响. 心理学报, 46(5), 677-690.
[2]  王佳(2011). 择偶复制现象影响因素的实证研究. 硕士学位论文, 上海: 华东师范大学.
[3]  郑日昌, 李占宏(2006). 共情研究的历史与现状. 中国心理卫生杂志, 20(4), 277-279.
[4]  庄锦英(2006). 决策心理学. 上海教育出版社.
[5]  庄锦英, 徐璟, 张森, 余菲(2012). 择偶复制: 一种适应性的性选择策略. 心理科学进展, 20(10), 1672-1678.
[6]  邹文谦(2014). 认知风格、社会距离对择偶复制的影响. 硕士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[7]  Apostolou, M. (2016). An Evolutionary Account of the Prevalence of Personality Traits That Impair Intimate Relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 140-148.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.024
[8]  Beisswanger, A. H., Stone, E. R., Hupp, J. M., & All-gaier, L. (2010). Risk Taking in Relationships: Differences in Deciding for Oneself versus for a Friend. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 121-135.
https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2502_3
[9]  Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in Human Mate Selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559-570.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559
[10]  Calvert, S. L., Strouse, G. A., & Murray, K. J. (2006). Empathy for Adolescents’ Role Model Selection and Learning of DVD Content. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 444-455.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2006.06.005
[11]  Centeno, R. P. R. (2020). Effect of Mindfulness on Em-pathy and Self-Compassion: An Adapted MBCT Program on Filipino College Students. Behavioral Sciences, 10, Article 61.
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10030061
[12]  Chu, S., Hardaker, R., & Lycett, J. E. (2007). Too Good to Be “True”? The Handicap of High Socio-Economic Status in Attractive Males. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1291-1300.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.007
[13]  Dagaeff, A. C., Pocheville, A., N?bel, S., Loyau, A., Isabel, G., & Danchin, E. (2016). Drosophila Mate Copying Correlates with Atmospheric Pressure in a Speed Learning Situation. Animal Behaviour, 121, 163-174.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.08.022
[14]  Danchin, E., Giraldeau, L. A., Valone, T. J., & Wagner, R. H. (2004). Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution. Science, 305, 487-491.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1098254
[15]  Danchin, E., Nobel, S., Pocheville, A., Dagaeff, A. C., Demay, L., Al-phand, M., Ranty-Roby, S., van Renssen, L., Monier, M., Gazagne, E., Allain, M., & Isabel, G. (2018). Cultural Flies: Conformist Social Learning in Fruitflies Predicts Long-Lasting Mate-Choice Traditions. Science, 362, 1025-1030.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat1590
[16]  Deng, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2015). Mate-Choice Copying in Single and Cou-pled Women: The Influence of Mate Acceptance and Mate Rejection Decisions of Other Women. Evolutionary Psychology, 13, 89-105.
https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491501300106
[17]  Feingold, A. (1992). Good-Looking People Are Not What We Think. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 304-341.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.304
[18]  Furnham, A. (2009). Sex Differences in Mate Selection Preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 262-267.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.013
[19]  Gierszewski, S., Keil, M., & Witte, K. (2018). Mate-Choice Copying in Sailfin Molly Females Public Information Use from Long-Distance Interactions. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 72, Article No. 26.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2441-6
[20]  Hill, S. E., & Ryan, M. J. (2005). The Role of Model Female Quality in the Mate Choice Copying Behaviour of Sailfin Mollies. Biology Letters, 2, 203-205.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2005.0423
[21]  Hsee, C. K., Hatfield, E., Carlson, J. G., & Chemtob, C. (1990). The Ef-fect of Power on Susceptibility to Emotional Contagion. Cognition & Emotion, 4, 327-340.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939008408081
[22]  Kniel, N., Schmitz, J., & Witte, K. (2015). Quality of Public Infor-mation Matters in Mate-Choice Copying in Female Zebra Finches. Frontiers in Zoology, 12, Article No. 26.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-015-0119-8
[23]  Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Debruine, L. M., & Caldwell, C. A. (2011). Social Learning and Human Mate Preferences: A Potential Mechanism for Generating and Maintaining between-Population Diversity in Attraction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 366-375.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0192
[24]  Muller, B. C., Van Leeuwen, M. L., Van Baaren, R. B., Bekkering, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2013). Empathy Is a Beautiful Thing: Empathy Predicts Imitation Only for Attractive Others. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54, 401-406.
https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12060
[25]  Perry, D., Hendler, T., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2012). Can We Share the Joy of Others? Empathic Neural Responses to Distress vs Joy. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 909-916.
https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr073
[26]  Pruett-Jones, S. (1992). Independent versus Nonindependent Mate Choice Do Females Copy Each Other? The American Naturalist, 140, 1000-1009.
https://doi.org/10.1086/285452
[27]  Raue, M., Streicher, B., Lermer, E., & Frey, D. (2015). How Far Does It Feel? Construal Level and Decisions under Risk. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 256-264.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.09.005
[28]  Rodeheffer, C. D., Proffitt Leyva, R. P., & Hill, S. E. (2016). At-tractive Female Romantic Partners Provide a Proxy for Unobservable Male Qualities. Evolutionary Psychology, 14, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916652144
[29]  Sened, H., Lavidor, M., Lazarus, G., Bar-Kalifa, E., Rafaeli, E., & Ickes, W. (2017). Empathic Accuracy and Relationship Satisfaction: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Family Psychology, 31, 742-752.
https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000320
[30]  Stel, M., van Baaren, R. B., & Vonk, R. (2008). Effects of Mimicking: Acting Prosocially by Being Emotionally Moved. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 965-976.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.472
[31]  Uller, T., & Johansson, L. C. (2003). Human Mate Choice and the Wedding Ring Effect. Human Nature, 14, 267-276.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1006-0
[32]  Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What Do People Think They’re Doing? Action Identification and Human Behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3-15.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.3
[33]  Wang, D., Zhou, S., Kong, X., Han, D., Liu, Y., Sun, L., Mao, W., Maguire, P., & Hu, Y. (2021). The Influence of Model Quality on Self-Other Mate Choice Copying. Personality and Indi-vidual Differences, 171, Article ID: 110481.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110481
[34]  Waynforth, D. (2007). Mate Choice Copying in Humans. Human Nature, 18, 264-271.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-007-9004-2
[35]  Wen, X., Zhang, Q., Zhou, Y., Du, J., & Xu, W. (2022). Mindful-ness and Intimate Relationship Satisfaction in Daily Life: The Role of Empathy. Psych Journal, 11, 500-509.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.535
[36]  Zhuang, J. Y., Ji, X., Zhao, Z., Fan, M., & Li, N. P. (2017). The Neural Basis of Human Female Mate Copying: An Empathy-Based Social Learning Process. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 779-788.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.05.006

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133