全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Effect of Single- versus Double-Layer Uterine Closure during Caesarean Section on Niche Formation and Menstrual Irregularity

DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2024.141007, PP. 57-68

Keywords: Single-Layer, Double, Caesarean Section, Residual Myometrium Thickness

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background: The myometrium at the location of the CS (caesarean section) scars, also known as residual myometrium thickness (RMT), is larger after a double-layer uterine closure procedure than following a single-layer one. It may lessen the formation of a niche that is the myometrium’s disruption at the location of the scar of the uterus. Gynecological manifestations, obstetric problems in a future pregnancy and birth, and maybe subfertility are linked to thin RMT and a niche. Objective: To ascertain if double-layer unlocked closure of the uterus is better than single-layer one in terms of post-menstrual spotting and niche development following a first CS. Patients and Methods: In this randomized clinical study, 287 patients were evaluated for qualifying. Of all eligible individuals, 57 patients were excluded from the study based on the inclusion criteria. Results: The variation in ages, gestational age, body mass index (BMI), and cesarean section indications between the two assigned groups is statistically insignificant. However, postmenstrual spotting was statistically significantly more common in single-layer group compared to in double-group. The current study revealed ultrasound findings suggestive of niche formation was statistically significantly more common in single-layer group compared to in double-layer group. Conclusion: As evident from the current study, it demonstrates the advantages of double-layer unlocked closure of the uterus over single-layer one in terms of post-menstrual spotting and niche development following first-time cs. Thus, we deduced that fewer niches are formed, and fewer menstrual spotting occurs in the presence of double unlocked layers closure. To ascertain the impact of uterus closure method on post-operative niche development and the risk of obstetrics and gynaecological problems, further prospective trials with extended follow-up periods are required.

References

[1]  Tekiner, N.B., Çetin, B.A., Türkgeldi, L.S., Yılmaz, G., Polat, İ. and Gedikbaşı, A. (2018) Evaluation of Cesarean Scar after Single- and Double-Layer Hysterotomy Closure: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 297, 1137-1143.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4702-z
[2]  Vachon-Marceau, C., Demers, S., Bujold, E., Roberge, S., Gauthier, R.J., Pasquier, J.C., Girard, M., Chaillet, N., Boulvain, M. and Jastrow, N. (2017) Single versus Double-Layer Uterine Closure at Cesarean: Impact on Lower Uterine Segment Thickness at Next Pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 217, 65-e1.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.042
[3]  Roberge, S., Boutin, A., Chaillet, N., Moore, L., Jastrow, N., Demers, S. and Bujold, E. (2016) Systematic Review of Cesarean Scar Assessment in the Nonpregnant State: Imaging Techniques and Uterine Scar Defect. American Journal of Perinatology, 29, 465-471.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1304829
[4]  Stegwee, S.I., Jordans, I., van der Voet, L.F., van de Ven, P.M., Ket, J., Lambalk, C.B., de Groot, C., Hehenkamp, W. and Huirne, J. (2018) Uterine Caesarean Closure Techniques Affect Ultrasound Findings and Maternal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BJOG, 125, 1097-1108.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15048
[5]  Sevket, O., Ates, S., Molla, T., Ozkal, F., Uysal, O. and Dansuk, R. (2014) Hydrosonographic Assessment of the Effects of 2 Different Suturing Techniques on Healing of the Uterine Scar after Cesarean Delivery. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 125, 219-222.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.11.013
[6]  Bennich, G., Rudnicki, M., Wilken-Jensen, C., Lousen, T., Lassen, P.D. and Wøjdemann, K. (2016) Impact of Adding a Second Layer to a Single Unlocked Closure of a Cesarean Uterine Incision: Randomized Controlled Trial. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 47, 417-422.
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15792
[7]  Tower, A.M. and Frishman, G.N. (2013) Cesarean Scar Defects: An Underrecognized Cause of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding and Other Gynecologic Complications. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 20, 562-572.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.03.008
[8]  Valentin, L. (2013) Prediction of Scar Integrity and Vaginal Birth after Caesarean Delivery. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 27, 285-295.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.003
[9]  van der Voet, L.F., Bij de Vaate, A.M., Veersema, S., Brölmann, H.A. and Huirne, J.A. (2014) Long-Term Complications of Caesarean Section. The Niche in the Scar: A Prospective Cohort Study on Niche Prevalence and Its Relation to Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. BJOG, 121, 236-244.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12542
[10]  DHS Program—Demographic and Health Surveys (2015) USAID.
http://dhsprogram.com/
[11]  Pomorski, M., Fuchs, T. and Zimmer, M. (2014) Prediction of Uterine Dehiscence Using Ultrasonographic Parameters of Cesarean Section Scar in the Nonpregnant Uterus: A Prospective Observational Study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14, 365.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-014-0365-3
[12]  Sholapurkar, S.L. (2018) Etiology of Cesarean Uterine Scar Defect (Niche): Detailed Critical Analysis of Hypotheses and Prevention Strategies and Peritoneal Closure Debate. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 10, 166-173.
https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3271w
[13]  Glavind, J., Madsen, L.D., Uldbjerg, N. and Dueholm, M. (2013) Ultrasound Evaluation of Cesarean Scar after Single- and Double-Layer Uterotomy Closure: A Cohort Study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 42, 207-212.
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12376

Full-Text

Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133