全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

“爱”的分析——基于摩尔的开放问题论证
An Analysis of “Love”—Based on Moore’s Open Question Argument

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2024.141027, PP. 193-199

Keywords: 爱的施行,开放问题论证,应然,自由
Exercise of Love
, Open Question Argumentation, Contingency, Freedom

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文利用分析哲学家摩尔(G. E. Moore)的开放问题论证(open question argument)这一思想资源,从语言分析的维度,来尝试性地揭示我们日常语言中“爱”这个概念的一般涵义。我们首先通过运用开放问题论证来说明“爱”这个概念不能用表征心理或生理的概念下定义,并通过发展开放问题论证的思路,揭示出“爱”的一般涵义具有应然性的特征,并进一步得到了“爱的施行应当是无欲望的关切”、“爱的施行应当符合自由的观念”等基本结论。
In this paper, we utilize the open question argument of analytic philosopher G. E. Moore to try to reveal the general meaning of the concept of “love” in our daily language from the dimension of lin-guistic analysis. Firstly, we use open question argument to show that the concept of “love” cannot be defined in terms of concepts characterizing psychology or physiology, and through the development of the idea of open question argument, we reveal that the general meaning of “love” is characterized by contingency, and we further get the following basic conclusions: “Love should be exercised with desireless concern”, “Love should be exercised in conformity with the notion of freedom”, etc.

References

[1]  罗素(2018). 我们关于外间世界的知识(陈启伟, 译, pp. 74-112). 上海译文出版社.
[2]  米勒(2015). 亲密关系(王伟平, 译, pp. 251-279). 人民邮电出版社.
[3]  摩尔(2005). 伦理学原理(长河, 译). 上海人民出版社.
[4]  孙逸凡(2023). 捍卫动机内在主义: 一种基于道德理性主义的策略. 哲学动态, (1), 79-88.
[5]  谭旭运, 屈青青(2016). 爱情心理学的四大理论建构集成——兼评《爱情心理学(最新版)》. 心理研究, 9(2), 92-96.
[6]  乌云特娜, 七十三(2015). 精神健康是心理健康教育的核心价值追求. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 33(2), 77-81.
[7]  贝克莱(2016). 人类知识原理(张桂权, 译, pp. 1-20). 人民出版社.
[8]  关洪(1984). 牛顿、歌德和黑格尔——关于颜色理论的争论. 自然辩证法通讯, (4), 6-13.
[9]  Bennett, H. (2021). Love. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition). The Metaphysics Research Lab, Philosophy Department, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/love/
[10]  Soames, S. (2003). Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century (pp. 34-48). Princeton University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400825790

Full-Text

comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133